BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 1259
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   April 21, 2009

                   ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON AGING AND LONG-TERM CARE
                               Bonnie Lowenthal, Chair
                   AB 1259 (Arambula) - As Amended:  April 13, 2009
           
          SUBJECT  :   Area agencies on aging: federal funding allocations.

           SUMMARY  :   Allows an area agency on aging (AAA) to carry over up  
          to 5 percent of its annual total baseline allocation of federal  
          funds. Specifically,  this bill  :  

          1)Allows an AAA to carry over, for future use, up to five  
            percent of its annual total baseline allocation under Titles  
            III and VII of the federal Older Americans Act (OAA).

          2)Prohibits an AAA from using the carried over funds to expand  
            baseline services.

          3)Specifies that the carried over funds shall be used only for  
            the following purposes:
             a)   The purchase of equipment that enhances the delivery of  
               services to the eligible service population;
             b)   Home and community-based projects, approved in advance  
               by the California Department of Aging (CDA), that are  
               designed to address the unmet needs of the eligible service  
               population identified in the area plan; and,
             c)   Innovative pilot projects, approved in advance by CDA,  
               that are designed for the development or enhancement of a  
               comprehensive and coordinated system of services.

           EXISTING LAW  

          1)Establishes the OAA which provides a national network of state  
            units on aging and AAAs to deliver home and community-based  
            programs for older adults.  Programs include nutrition,  
            transportation, information and assistance, elder abuse  
            prevention, and caregiver support.

          2)Establishes the Older Californians Act (OCA) which provides  
            state-funded programs and services for older adults and people  
            with disabilities.  

          3)Establishes CDA as the state unit on aging to administer a  
            broad range of home and community-based programs.  The  
            department's mission is to provide leadership to the AAAs in  
            developing systems of home and community-based services that  
            maintain individuals in their own homes or least restrictive  





                                                                  AB 1259
                                                                  Page  2

            homelike environments.

          4)Requires CDA to develop minimum standards for service delivery  
            to ensure that programs meet consumer needs, operate in a  
            cost-effective manner, and preserve the independence and  
            dignity of aging Californians.

          5)Establishes the AAAs as the entities that provide for and/or  
            deliver services under the OAA, the OCA, and other funding  
            sources at the local level.  

          6)Requires AAAs to develop an area plan every four years that  
            considers available data and population trends, assesses the  
            need for services, identifies the sources of funding for those  
            services, and develops and implements a plan for delivery of  
            those services based upon community need.

          7)Requires CDA to implement an intrastate funding formula to  
            apply to all federal and state funds allocated for programs  
            provided under Title III of the OAA.  The intrastate funding  
            formula includes all of the following:

             a)   Assurances that all AAAs shall have a $50,000  
               administrative base with the remainder of the allowable  
               administrative dollars allocated to planning and service  
               areas (PSA) on the basis of the number of persons over the  
               age of 60;

             b)   An annual update by CDA for changes in population  
               characteristics to include the number of persons per PSA  
               over the age of 60 and persons in greatest economic or  
               social need as measured by the following variables:
               i)     The number of person over the age of 65 receiving  
                 aid under the State Supplementary Program for the Aged,  
                 Blind, and Disabled;
               ii)    The number of minority elderly over the age of 60;
               iii)   The number of persons over the age of 60 living  
                 alone; and,
               iv)    The number of non-English speaking persons over the  
                 age of 60.

             c)   A rural factor that guarantees a 105 percent allocation  
               to rural PSAs; and, 

             d)   A hold-harmless factor that guarantees that no PSA shall  
               have its federal and state allocation of funds, excluding  
               administrative costs, reduced below the 1984-85 fiscal year  
               funding levels. 





                                                                  AB 1259
                                                                  Page  3


          8)Requires CDA to allocate a baseline amount of $35,000 to  
            Long-Term Care Ombudsman programs with the remainder of all  
            federal and state funds for local ombudsman programs  
            distributed as follows:
             a)   50 percent to each local program based on the number of  
               facilities served by the program in proportion to the total  
               number of facilities in the state;
             b)   40 percent of the funds based on the number of beds  
               within the local program's area of service in proportion to  
               the total number of beds in the state; and,
             c)   10 percent of the funds based on the total square miles  
               within each local program's area of service in proportion  
               to the number of square miles in the state.

          Existing regulations specify the process for the redistribution  
          of federal funds in the following scenarios:  funds that are not  
          expended or encumbered for services by an AAA, funds that are  
          recovered from an AAA as a result of a fiscal audit  
          determination and resolution by CDA, or funds allocated by the  
          Administration on Aging to CDA as a result of the federal  
          re-allotment process.  Depending on the original funding source,  
          CDA uses the intrastate funding formula and/or the funding  
          formula for the Long-Term Care Ombudsman program in  
          redistributing unused or recovered funds.

          Under regulations adopted in 2007, AAAs are allowed to carry  
          over up to five percent of their baseline allocation annually.   
          The use of the retained funds is restricted to the following:  
          the purchase of equipment which enhances the delivery of  
          services; home and community-based projects approved in advance  
          by CDA and designed to address the unmet needs of an eligible  
          service population identified in the AAA's area plan, or  
          innovative pilot projects, approved in advance by CDA and  
          designed for the development or enhancement of a comprehensive  
          and coordinated system of services.  The carry-over funds are  
          not allowed to be used to increase baseline services.


          In addition, regulations allow CDA to waive the reallocation  
          requirements for an AAA affected by a federal, state, or locally  
          declared emergency or natural disaster affecting the delivery of  
          OAA services.  If a waiver is granted, the affected AAA may  
          carry over all of its unspent funds for up to one year following  
          the emergency or disaster.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :   Unknown.






                                                                  AB 1259
                                                                  Page  4

           COMMENTS  :   
          California has 33 AAAs which provide services that are vital to  
          the well-being of older adults such as basic nutrition,  
          transportation, in-home assistance, and caregiver support.  AAAs  
          in communities across the state plan, coordinate and offer  
          services that help older adults remain in their home. 

          AAAs receive funding from the federal OAA, the state OCA, and a  
          variety of local and grant sources.  OAA funds are allocated  
          according to the state's fiscal year calendar and distributed  
          across several program categories (supportive services,  
          congregate meals, home-delivered meals, caregiver support,  
          etc.), and must be spent at the local level within that program  
          category, with limited flexibility allowed for fund transfers  
          across certain program areas.  In the event that an AAA does not  
          fully expend or encumber its federal funds for services by June  
          30th of a given fiscal year, the AAA is allowed to retain up to  
          five percent of the funds by program category to be carried over  
          into the following year.  The remaining funds above the five  
          percent carry-over are redistributed to all AAAs via the  
          appropriate intrastate funding formula for one-time-only use.

          In Fiscal Year 2007-08, California's AAAs received $103,667,590  
          in total baseline funding, with just over $5 million unspent at  
          the close of the fiscal year.  Under existing regulations,  
          $2,332,293 was carried over across all AAAs and $3,041,234  
          redistributed by CDA through the intrastate funding formula.   
          The amount of unspent funds, and the corresponding carry-over  
          funds, varied by AAA with over one third of the AAAs with  
          unspent funds less than $15,000.  

          In 2007, CDA adopted a new regulation restricting the ability of  
          AAAs to carry over unspent funds to five percent of their  
          baseline funding in each funding category.  The author contends  
          that this new policy has a negative affect on agencies,  
          particularly the smaller and rural ones who tend to have lower  
          federal allocations to begin with.  However, under the new  
          regulations, numerous rural AAAs have benefited from the  
          redistribution of unspent funds.  For example, the AAA serving  
          Lassen, Modoc, Shasta, Siskiyou, and Trinity Counties had $4,120  
          in unspent funds at the close of the 2007-08 fiscal year.  They  
          were allowed to carry over all of their unspent funds, and also  
          received $37,631 in redistributed funds.  The AAA covering  
          Fresno and Madera Counties had $98,948 in unspent funds at the  
          close of 2007-08, carried over all of their unspent funds, and  
          received an additional $87,157 in redistributed funds.

          This bill will change the carry-over allowance by enabling AAAs  





                                                                  AB 1259
                                                                  Page  5

          to carry-over up to five percent of their total baseline  
          allocation, instead of the existing five percent carry-over  
          allowance by program category. Under existing federal law, AAAs  
          must expend their federal dollars by program category.  The  
          federal requirements would also apply to the carry-over funds.   
          While the proponents' intent is to provide more flexibility in  
          the carry-over funds, the actual impact may be a greater  
          administrative burden for local AAAs and CDA to track the total  
          carry-over funds per AAA and the corresponding allocations and  
          expenditures by program category as required by federal law.  

          Proponents argue that allowing AAAs to carry-over a slightly  
          larger amount will allow agencies to plan and sustain AAA  
          services during a period in which no federal or state funds are  
          distributed.  Yet, the bill as drafted does not guarantee an AAA  
          a larger carry-over amount, and even with the potential for  
          greater carry-over under this bill, a number of issues will  
          likely prohibit the ability of the carry-over funds to sustain  
          services due to a budget delay, including:

               ?      Timeline for distribution of carry-over funds:  At  
                 the end of a given fiscal year, AAAs have until August  
                 30th to submit their closeout statements to CDA.  CDA  
                 then has to reconcile the reports and calculate the  
                 amount of carry-over allowed in each program category for  
                 each AAA which can take over a month.  The process used  
                 by both the AAAs and CDA inhibit the availability of the  
                 carry-over funds to be used during a budget impasse.  

               ?      Limited flexibility for carry-over funds: In the  
                 event that an AAA has cash advances from CDA for services  
                 that were unspent during the current year (prior to July  
                 1), the cash advances remain with the AAA and can only be  
                 spent on current year expenses until the budget is  
                 signed.  Only after the budget is signed could an AAA use  
                 the carry-over funds as normal.  AAAs cannot execute  
                 contracts and allocate money for the new budget year if  
                 the state budget is delayed.  

               ?      Restricted use of carry-over funds: Both current  
                 regulations and this bill restrict the use of the  
                 carry-over funds to one-time-only use and explicitly  
                 prohibit the use of carry-over funds for expansion of  
                 baseline funding.  Furthermore, federal law requires that  
                 funds be spent within the program category they were  
                 originally allocated to, limiting an AAA's ability to  
                 transfer money to services or providers who may be  
                 struggling due to the budget delay.  In most cases, the  





                                                                  AB 1259
                                                                  Page  6

                 amount of carry-over funds available in a given program  
                 category will not be adequate to truly sustain services.

          The Fresno-Madera AAA argues in support of the bill that CDA has  
          used the update in regulations to regress back to a time of  
          micromanagement of AAAs and that the new regulations are far  
          more restrictive than the federal OAA.  In addition, CDA has the  
          authority and responsibility to sanction any AAA that  
          intentionally rolls over large sums of money from one fiscal  
          year to another for inappropriate purposes.  

          The California Association of Area Agencies on Aging (C4A), the  
          statewide association representing the AAAs throughout the  
          state, writes in opposition that the bill is intended to undo  
          recently enacted regulations setting consistent statewide policy  
          for the prudent use of OAA funds.  The broad objective of the  
          regulations is to ensure that funds allocated to AAAs are spent  
          in a timely and efficient manner for the purposes intended by  
          Congress and federal law.  

          C4A contends that the current authority and flexibility to roll  
          over up to five percent of federal funds allows an AAA to spend  
          dollars more effectively, plan for needed one-time-only  
          expenditures, and maintain dollars that were unexpectedly  
          unspent.  In fact, the data illustrates that most AAAs spend  
          within the five percent allowed, a level that C4A believes is  
          prudent, responsible, and acceptable.  Finally, C4A argues that  
          the current regulations have accomplished their intended purpose  
          of ensuring that dollars are spent for direct client services.   
          Rather than change regulations to accommodate those AAAs having  
          difficulty in complying with the mandate to spend their  
          allocation, education, technical assistance, and training is the  
          appropriate approach.

          According to the author, the new regulation, budget cuts, and  
          lateness of the budget passage have devastating affects on AAAs,  
          particularly the smaller and rural ones who tend to have lower  
          federal allocations to begin with.  In the current model, AAAs  
          must spend their money early or lose it.  Allowing AAAs to carry  
          a slightly larger amount will allow agencies to plan and sustain  
          AAA services during that period in which no federal or state  
          funds are distributed.  In these tough economic times of  
          uncertainty, AAAs are not asking for more money, but simply for  
          flexibility in spending what has already been allocated to them.

           Policy Questions
           1)Does allowing an AAA to base its five percent carry-over  
            amount on the total baseline allocation across program  





                                                                  AB 1259
                                                                  Page  7

            categories as opposed to existing regulations create a greater  
            administrative burden for the AAA and CDA?

          2)Does this bill provide a greater disincentive for spending all  
            of an AAA's federal funding within each program area during  
            the fiscal year?

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :   

           Support 
           
          Aging Services of California
          Center for Independent Living-Fresno
          Council on Aging, Silicon Valley
          Fresno-Madera Agency on Aging (FMAAA)

           Opposition 
           
          California Association of Area Agencies on Aging (C4A)
          Planning and Service Area 2 Area Agency on Aging
           
          Analysis Prepared by  :    Allison Ruff / AGING & L.T.C. / (916)  
          319-3990