BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 1336
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   April 27, 2009

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION
                                   Mike Eng, Chair
                     AB 1336 (Eng) - As Amended:  April 13, 2009
           
          SUBJECT  :  Parking violations: digital image recording 

           SUMMARY  :  Authorizes a local public agency to issue citations  
          based on photo-evidence of parking violations occurring in  
          street-sweeping parking lanes.  Specifically,  this bill  :   

          1)Authorizes a local public agency to utilize an automated  
            parking enforcement system that includes installation of  
            equipment on agency-owned or operated street sweepers for the  
            purpose of capturing digital images of parking violations  
            occurring in street sweeping parking lanes.  

          2)Requires that devices to be angled and focused so as to  
            capture digital images of parking violations and not  
            unnecessarily capture identifying images of other drivers,  
            vehicles, and pedestrians.  

          3)Limits citations only for violations captured during the  
            posted hours of operation for a street-sweeper parking lane.  

          4)Allows a local public agency to contract with a private vendor  
            for the installation and maintenance of the automated parking  
            enforcement system in addition to the processing of notices of  
            parking violations, if the local authority maintains overall  
            control and supervision of the automated parking enforcement  
            system.  Prohibits any other entity other than a public agency  
            from operating an automated parking enforcement system.  

          5)Requires prior to issuing notices of parking violations, a  
            public agency to issue only warning notices for 30-days.  

          6)Requires public notification of the program 30 days prior to  
            implementation.  

          7)Allows a contestant to seek a court review of the violation,  
            following an initial review by a local agency and an  
            administrative hearing.  

          8)Establishes that a violation of a statute, regulation, or  








                                                                  AB 1336
                                                                  Page  2

            ordinance governing vehicle parking under this bill, under a  
            federal or state statute or regulation, or under an ordinance  
            enacted by a local authority occurring in a street sweeper  
            parking traffic lane or during posted street sweeping hours  
            observed by the designated employee in the recordings is  
            subject to a civil penalty.  

          9)Allows a registered owner of the vehicle to review the digital  
            evidence of the alleged violation on the Internet or during  
            normal business hours at no cost.  

          10)Requires that digital image evidence be retained for up to  
            six months from the date the information was first obtained or  
            60 days after final disposition of the citation, whichever  
            date is later, after which time the information shall be  
            destroyed.  

          11)Requires that digital image evidence from forward facing  
            automated enforcement devices that does not contain evidence  
            of a violation occurring in a street sweeping parking lane to  
            be destroyed within 15 days after the information is first  
            obtained.  

          12)Provides that digital image records are confidential, and  
            that public agencies can use the records only purposes of this  
            bill.  

          13)Requires a designated employee to issue a notice of a parking  
            violation to the registered owner within 15 days of the  
            violation.  

          14)Requires that the notice of parking violation also include  
            the date, time, and location of the violation.  

          15)Provides that confidential information obtained from the  
            Department of Motor Vehicles for purposes of obtaining  
            registered owners address is to be held confidential and not  
            used for any other purpose.  

          16)Declares that street sweepers remove unnecessary pollutants,  
            contaminants, chemicals, trash and debris from streets and  
            roads, thereby protecting the public.  

          17)Declares that such cities as Chicago and Washington D.C.  
            already utilize automated parking enforcement systems mounted  








                                                                  AB 1336
                                                                  Page  3

            on their local public agency owned or operated street  
            sweepers.  

           EXISTING LAW:  

          1)Authorizes the City and County of San Francisco, until January  
            1, 2012, to enforce parking violations-only traffic lanes  
            through the use of video image evidence.  

          2)Provides that videotaped records are confidential, and that  
            public agencies shall use the records only for law enforcement  
            purposes or for purposes of this bill.  

          3)Describes the cameras authorized to be mounted on San  
            Francisco city-owned public transit vehicles as "automated  
            forwarding facing parking control devices" and only qualified  
            employees review the video recordings for determining possible  
            parking violations.  

          4)Requires that the notice of parking violation also include the  
            date, time, and location of the violation.  

          5)Restricts citations to be issued only for violations captured  
            during the posted hours of operation for a transit-only  
            traffic lane.  Requires the devices to be angled and focused  
            so as to capture video images of parking violations and not  
            unnecessarily capture identifying images of other drivers,  
            vehicles, and pedestrians.  

          6)Requires that proof of mailing to the address of the vehicle's  
            registered owner be maintained by the local agency and  
            establishes that additional fees, assessments, or charges  
            cannot be assessed if the registered owner declares, under  
            penalty of perjury, that the notice of parking violation was  
            not received.  

          7)Requires, prior to issuing notices of parking violations, the  
            City of San Francisco to issue only warning notices for 30  
            days.  Requires public notification of the program 30 days  
            prior to implementation.  

          8)Require that video image evidence from forward facing  
            automated enforcement devices that does not contain evidence  
            of a parking violation occurring in a transit-only traffic  
            lane to be destroyed within 15 days after the information is  








                                                                  AB 1336
                                                                  Page  4

            first obtained.  

          9)Make findings and declarations that generally recognize that  
            this bill would impinge upon the privacy rights of individuals  
            depicted in the videotaped records.  

          10)Requires the City of San Francisco to provide an evaluation  
            of the pilot program to the Senate and Assembly Transportation  
            Committees by March 1, 2011.  

          11)Sunsets these provisions on January 1, 2012.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  Unknown  

           COMMENTS  :  According to the author, this bill "will would not  
          only be beneficial to local government, since pollutants and  
          trash being cleaned from our streets has proven to be  
          environmentally effective, but it would provide local cities the  
          flexibility to more efficiently use scares resources by allowing  
          personnel that previously enforced street cleaning violations to  
          be possibly redirected to enforce other higher traffic  
          priorities throughout the city."  

          The author points out that there are "substantial environmental  
          benefits of routinely cleaning local streets and roads."  A  
          recent District of Columbia Department of Public Works study  
          showed that an average of 10 pounds of oil and grease, three  
          pounds of nitrogen and phosphorus, and up to two pounds of heavy  
          metals are typically removed per mile swept of local streets and  
          roads through street sweeping.  "Street sweeping is especially  
          critical in more urbanized areas with higher areas of paving,  
          since it is important to capture pollutants before they are made  
          soluble by rainwater."  

          In addition to the environmental benefits outlined by the  
          author, the California Public Parking Association, sponsor of  
          the bill, suggests that by allowing automated parking  
          enforcement systems to be placed on street sweepers, this bill  
          will effectively complement the work of existing parking  
          enforcement personnel and help allocate scarce resources.  

          In many cities parking enforcement personnel perform essential  
          public safety and traffic management responsibilities,  
          including, but not limited to red zone violations, rush hour  
          restrictions, limited time parking, parking meter expiration, as  








                                                                  AB 1336
                                                                  Page  5

          well as neighborhood issues including parked driveways.  

          In support, the City of San Diego asserts that automated parking  
          enforcement would "complement the work and responsibilities of  
          parking personnel, help focus resources for higher priority  
          parking violations and other more critical transportation  
          enforcement demands and minimize costs associated with storm  
          water treatment policies"  

          Currently, such cities as Chicago and Washington D.C. utilize  
          the automated street sweeper system, known as SweeperCam on  
          local public agency-owned or operated street sweepers.  The  
          system uses photo-light sensing, character recognition and  
          global positioning system (GPS) technology to spot parking  
          scofflaws and fix their locations.  

          The City of Chicago approved an ordinance in 2008 and began  
          using the system on a limited number of street sweepers.  The  
          City of Washington D.C. has used the automated technology on two  
          street sweepers on a trial basis.  A larger implementation of  
          the system is expected later this year, once personnel are  
          trained and system glitches are fixed.  

          In California, use of similar automated enforcement technology  
          is authorizes for red light violations by a governmental agency.  
           Last year, usage of this technology was authorized on a pilot  
          project basis for the City and County of San Francisco (San  
          Francisco) to issue citations based on photo-evidence of  
          transit-only lane parking violations.  The authority granted to  
          San Francisco was contained in AB 101 (Ma), Chapter 377,  
          Statutes of 2008.  

          The provisions of this bill are modeled and crafted similarly to  
          provisions contained in AB 101.  It is important to note that  
          this bill, much like the bill that it is modeled after, places  
          safeguards to address privacy concerns.  

          This bill requires that digital image evidence from forward  
          facing automated enforcement devices that does not contain  
          evidence of a violation occurring in a street sweeping parking  
          lane to be destroyed within 15 days after the information is  
          first obtained.  

           Similar legislation  :  AB 101 (Ma), Chapter 377, Statutes of  
          2008, authorized the City and County of San Francisco to issue  








                                                                  AB 1336
                                                                  Page  6

          citations based on photo-evidence of transit-only lane parking  
          violations.

          SB 1136 (Kopp), Chapter 54, Statutes of 1998, repealed the  
          January 1, 1999 sunset date, and extended indefinitely  
          provisions which allow the use of automated enforcement systems  
          at official traffic control signals.  

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :   

           Support 
           
          California Public Parking Association (sponsor)
          City of San Diego
          League of California Cities

           Opposition 
           
          None on file
           

          Analysis Prepared by  :   Alejandro Esparza / TRANS. / (916)  
          319-2093