BILL ANALYSIS
AB 1351
Page 1
Date of Hearing: April 27, 2009
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES
Nancy Skinner, Chair
AB 1351 (Blakeslee) - As Amended: April 13, 2009
SUBJECT : Renewable energy resources
SUMMARY : Revises certification conditions for hydroelectric
facilities eligible for the Renewables Portfolio Standard (RPS)
to permit certification from an agency other than the State
Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), such as if the facility
is located in another state.
EXISTING LAW generally limits RPS eligibility of hydroelectric
facilities to facilities 30 megawatts or less, but permits new
incremental increases in electricity production from facilities
over 30 megawatts, if the increase results from efficiency
improvements and meets specified water quality criteria,
including that the facility has, with the last 15 years,
received an exemption or certification from the SWRCB pursuant
to Section 401 of the federal Clean Water Act (water quality
standards applicable to hydroelectric facilities). The
requirement for SWRCB certification acts as a prohibition on out
of state facilities, which are not under SWRCB jurisdiction.
FISCAL EFFECT : Unknown
COMMENTS :
This bill is intended to accommodate RPS eligibility for
efficiency improvement at large hydroelectric facilities located
outside California, which can't meet the existing requirement
for SWRCB certification because they lie outside SWRCB's
jurisdiction. This may provide an additional incentive for
facilities to undertake efficiency improvement and increase the
availability of resources for compliance with California's RPS.
However, it may also attract "free riders" i.e., facilities in
the Northwest that may already undertake routine efficiency
improvements for other reasons. An influx of RPS-eligible
hydropower from out-of-state would diminish development of new
renewable energy facilities in California. In addition,
out-of-state facilities present a problem regarding the ability
to enforce California (or comparable) water quality standards
because other states may not have comparable standards. If it
AB 1351
Page 2
is intended to permit eligibility only for facilities owned by
utilities subject to the RPS, the author and the committee may
wish to consider adopting a clarifying amendment to that effect
to limit the scope of the bill.
REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION :
Support
Pacific Power
Sierra Pacific Power
Opposition
None on file
Analysis Prepared by : Lawrence Lingbloom / NAT. RES. / (916)
319-2092