BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    




                                                                  AB 1369
                                                                  Page A

          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
          AB 1369 (Davis)
          As Amended April 13, 2009
          Majority vote 

           PUBLIC SAFETY       7-0         APPROPRIATIONS      16-0        
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Solorio, Hagman,          |Ayes:|De Leon, Nielsen,         |
          |     |Furutani, Gilmore, Hill,  |     |Ammiano,                  |
          |     |Ma, Skinner               |     |Charles Calderon, Davis,  |
          |     |                          |     |Duvall, Krekorian, Hall,  |
          |     |                          |     |Harkey, Miller,           |
          |     |                          |     |John A. Perez, Price,     |
          |     |                          |     |Skinner, Solorio, Audra   |
          |     |                          |     |Strickland, Torlakson     |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 

           SUMMARY  :  Removes the requirement that inmates subject to the  
          involuntary home detention program be misdemeanor inmates.   
          Specifically,  this bill  :  

          1)Provides that notwithstanding any other provision of law, upon  
            determination by the correctional administrator that  
            conditions in a jail facility warrant the necessity of  
            releasing sentenced inmates prior to them serving the full  
            amount of a given sentence due to lack of jail space, the  
            board of supervisors of any county may authorize the  
            correctional administrator to offer a program under which  
            inmates committed to a county jail or other county  
            correctional facility or granted probation, or inmates  
            participating in a work furlough program, may be required to  
            participate in an involuntary home detention program, which  
            shall include electronic monitoring, during their sentence in  
            lieu of confinement in the county jail or other county  
            correctional facility or program under the auspices of the  
            probation officer.

          2)Prescribes that every prisoner arrested and booked for,  
            charged with, or convicted of a felony, who is a participant  
            in a home detention program under existing law who escapes is  
            guilty of a felony and, if the escape or attempt to escape was  
            not by force or violence, is punishable by imprisonment in the  
            state prison for 16 months, 2 or 3 years, to be served  









                                                                  AB 1369
                                                                  Page B

            consecutively, or in a county jail, not exceeding one year.

          3)States that if the escape or attempt to escape is committed by  
            force or violence, the person is guilty of a felony,  
            punishable by imprisonment in the state prison for a full term  
            of two, four, or six years to be served consecutively to any  
            other term of imprisonment, commencing from the time the  
            person would have been released from imprisonment and the term  
            shall not be subject to reduction, or in a county jail for a  
            consecutive term not to exceed one year, that term to commence  
            from the time the prisoner otherwise would have been  
            discharged from jail.

          4)Excepts in unusual cases where the interests of justice would  
            best be served if the person is granted probation, probation  
            shall not be granted to any person who is convicted of a  
            felony offense under this section in that he or she escaped or  
            attempted to escape from a home detention program.

          5)Mandates that the willful failure of a prisoner, to return to  
            his or her place of confinement no later than the expiration  
            of the period that he or she was permitted to participate in a  
            home detention program, is an escape.  A prisoner convicted of  
            a felony who willfully fails to return to his or her place of  
            confinement shall be punished by imprisonment in the state  
            prison for 16 months, 2 or 3 years, to be served  
            consecutively, or in a county jail, not exceeding one year.

           EXISTING LAW  :

          1)Provides that notwithstanding any other provision of law, upon  
            determination by the correctional administrator that  
            conditions in a jail facility warrant the necessity of  
            releasing sentenced misdemeanor inmates prior to them serving  
            the full amount of a given sentence due to lack of jail space,  
            the board of supervisors of any county may authorize the  
            correctional administrator to offer a program under which  
            inmates committed to a county jail or other county  
            correctional facility or granted probation, or inmates  
            participating in a work furlough program, may be required to  
            participate in an involuntary home detention program, which  
            shall include electronic monitoring, during their sentence in  
            lieu of confinement in the county jail or other county  
            correctional facility or program under the auspices of the  









                                                                  AB 1369
                                                                  Page C

            probation officer.  

          2)States that notwithstanding any other provision of law, the  
            board of supervisors of any county may authorize the  
            correctional administrator, to offer a program under which  
            minimum security inmates and low-risk offenders committed to a  
            county jail or other county correctional facility or granted  
            probation, or inmates participating in a work furlough  
            program, may voluntarily participate in a home detention  
            program during their sentence in lieu of confinement in the  
            county jail or other county correctional facility or program  
            under the auspices of the probation officer.  

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee, no direct state costs, as the expansion would be  
          utilized upon direction of county boards of supervisors and the  
          correctional administrator, and the cost would be absorbed by  
          the county.

          The non reimbursable cost of involuntary home detention  
          electronic monitoring is about $10 per day, compared to no cost  
          if these offenders do no jail time, and about $100 per day for  
          county jail.  At $10 per day, the cost of an additional 500  
          inmates on a statewide basis is about $1.8 million.

           COMMENTS  :  According to the author, "Based on the lack of space  
          in the Los Angeles County jail system, a federal court has  
          placed a mandatory cap on the number of inmates in the system  
          (Rutherford v. Block).  To adhere to the cap, the Sheriff's  
          Department has reduced the percentage of time served by inmates  
          committed to county jail.  The Sheriff Department offered the  
          voluntary electronic monitoring program and in 2007 ran SB 959  
          (Romero and Runner) to create an involuntary home detention  
          electronic monitoring program, which has been very successful.   
          Approximately 1,500 inmates are currently on some form of Home  
          Electronic Monitoring, up from 437 in 2007.  Prior to SB 959,  
          inmates were spending an average of 10% of their sentence in  
          jail before being released early due to overcrowding.  Now, male  
          inmates are doing approximately 75% of their sentence. 

          "Under current law, California Penal Code Section 1203.017  
          allows involuntary participation by qualified, minimum-security,  
          low-risk inmates in a home detention electronic monitoring  
          program in lieu of confinement in the county jail.  By giving  









                                                                  AB 1369
                                                                  Page D

          the Sheriff's Department the discretion and the option to put an  
          inmate on the involuntary home detention electronic monitoring  
          program, the Department has been able to better manage and  
          control the jail population.  If sentenced qualified, low-risk  
          felony county jail commitments (currently, there are about 230  
          eligible inmates in Los Angeles County) are added to this  
          section, we can better control our population and create much  
          needed room for the more serious offenders."

          Please see the policy committee for a full discussion of this  
          bill.
           

          Analysis Prepared by  :    Nicole J. Hanson / PUB. S. / (916)  
          319-3744 


                                                                FN: 0000932