BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 1375
                                                                  Page  1


          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
          AB 1375 (Galgiani)
          As Amended  January 15, 2010
          Majority vote 

           TRANSPORTATION      9-4         APPROPRIATIONS      12-5        
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Eng, Blumenfield, Conway, |Ayes:|De Leon, Ammiano,         |
          |     |Furutani, Galgiani,       |     |Bradford, Charles         |
          |     |Bonnie Lowenthal,         |     |Calderon, Coto, Davis,    |
          |     |John A. Perez, Solorio    |     |Fuentes, Hall, John A.    |
          |     |                          |     |Perez, Skinner, Solorio,  |
          |     |                          |     |Torlakson                 |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |Nays:|Jeffries, Garrick,        |Nays:|Conway, Harkey, Miller,   |
          |     |Miller, Niello            |     |Nielsen, Audra Strickland |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY  :  Establishes the Department of High-Speed Trains  
          (Department).  Specifically,  this bill  :  

          1)Expresses legislative intent, including the desire to "provide  
            an efficient governmental structure for the development of  
            high-speed train operations in the state."  

          2)Establishes the Department, within the California Business,  
            Transportation and Housing Agency (BTHA), to implement the  
            high-speed passenger rail development policies as established  
            by the High-Speed Rail Authority (Authority), whose existence  
            would continue as the policy and project programming entity  
            for high-speed rail projects of the state.  

          3)Transfers certain of the existing powers and responsibilities  
            of the Authority to the Department, and would specify  
            additional powers and duties of the Authority and Department  
            relative to implementation of the high-speed rail project.  

          4)Requires the Authority to establish policies, in consultation  
            with the Department, directing the development and  
            implementation of intercity high-speed train service that is  









                                                                  AB 1375
                                                                  Page  2


            fully integrated with the state's existing intercity rail and  
            bus network.  Requires the Department to implement the  
            policies.  

          5)Requires the Authority to establish an independent peer review  
            group for the purpose of reviewing the planning, engineering,  
            financing, and other elements of the Authority's plans and  
            issuing an analysis of appropriateness and accuracy of the  
            Authority's assumptions and an analysis of the viability of  
            the Authority's financing plan, including the funding plan for  
            each corridor.  

          6)Specifies the powers, duties, and responsibilities of the  
            Authority as follows:  

             a)   Select the routes of the high-speed train system;  

             b)   Serve as the governing body of the Department, for  
               purposes of the adoption of resolutions of necessity;  

             c)   Advise BTHA and the Department concerning high-speed  
               rail matters.  Thereupon, requires the Department to  
               consider such advice in the exercise of its powers and  
               duties.  

             d)   Adopt criteria for the award of franchises; and,  

             e)   Set fares or establish guidelines for the setting of  
               fares.  

          7)Specifies the organization of the Department and authorizes  
            its director to perform all duties, exercise all powers and  
            jurisdiction, assume and discharge all responsibilities, and  
            carry out and effect all purposes vested by law in the  
            Department.  

          8)Establishes that the director of the Department would be  
            appointed by the Governor, who would serve at the pleasure of  
            the Authority.  

          9)Authorizes the Department to include up to 10 executive  
            employees of the Department who would be exempt from civil  









                                                                  AB 1375
                                                                  Page  3


            service, appointed by the Governor, and serve at the pleasure  
            of the director.  Authorizes the Authority to set the salary  
            of the executive employees and director in amounts that are  
            reasonably necessary to attract and hold a person of superior  
            qualifications.  Sets parameters for the Authority in its  
            determination of salary compensation.  

          10)Authorizes the Governor, BTHA, and the Department to enter  
            into agreements, execute documents, establish and manage  
            accounts, and take any other appropriate action to receive and  
            expend available federal funds for mass transportation  
            programs and projects.  

          11)Provides authority to the Department for property acquisition  
            and disposition and authorization to employ its own legal  
            staff or contract out.  

           EXISTING LAW  :  

          1)Creates, in 1996, the Authority to be responsible for  
            planning, constructing, and operating a high-speed train  
            system serving California's major metropolitan areas.  The  
            Authority has a nine-member policy board (five appointed by  
            the Governor, two appointed by the Senate and two appointed by  
            the Assembly).  Its executive director is selected by and  
            reports directly to the Authority's policy board.  

          2)Enacts the Safe, Reliable High-Speed Passenger Train Bond Act  
            for the 21st Century (Bond Act).  The Bond Act, approved as  
            Proposition 1A in November 2008, provides $9.95 billion in  
            general obligation bond authority to fund the planning and  
            construction of a high-speed passenger train system and  
            complementary improvements to other specified rail systems in  
            the state.  Authorizes the Authority to use up 10% of the bond  
            proceeds for environmental studies, planning, and preliminary  
            engineering activities.  Authorizes 75% of the 10% of the  
            funds to be used for purchase of property and right of way,  
            mitigation of environmental impacts, and other uses as  
            specified.  Establishes a 2.5% cap on the use of bond proceeds  
            for administrative purposes.  The actual amount to be  
            appropriated in the annual Budget Act.  Authorizes the cap to  
            be adjusted by statute, but not beyond a maximum 5% level.  









                                                                  AB 1375
                                                                  Page  4



          3)Authorizes, through enactment of the federal American Recovery  
            and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (the recently enacted federal  
            economic stimulus package), $8 billion for high-speed rail  
            passenger services throughout the nation.  Also, the federal  
            stimulus package provides additional intercity and commuter  
            rail passenger discretionary funding that potentially could  
            benefit the state.  

          4)Authorizes, through the passage of Proposition 1B in November,  
            2006, $100 million for high priority highway-railroad at-grade  
            separation projects to be selected by the California  
            Transportation Commission (CTC) in consultation with the  
            Authority.  

          5)Establishes BTHA that includes, under its aegis, 13  
            departments and several economic development programs and  
            commissions consisting of more than 44,000 employees and a  
            budget of $20 billion.  Its responsibilities and operations  
            address issues that directly impact the state's economic  
            vitality and quality of life including; transportation, public  
            safety, affordable housing, international trade, financial  
            services, tourism, and managed health care.  

          6)Establishes, in 1978, the CTC for the development and  
            implementation of a single, unified California transportation  
            policy.  CTC is responsible for the programming and allocating  
            of funds for the construction of highway, passenger rail and  
            transit improvements throughout California.  The CTC consists  
            of 11 voting members and two non-voting ex-officio members.   
            Of the 11 voting members, nine are appointed by the Governor,  
            one is appointed by the Senate Rules Committee, and one is  
            appointed by the Speaker of the Assembly.  The CTC is  
            responsible for the programming and allocating of funds for  
            the construction of highway, passenger rail and transit  
            improvements throughout California.  The CTC also advises and  
            assists the BTHA and the Legislature in formulating and  
            evaluating state policies and plans for California's  
            transportation programs.  

          7)Establishes, in 1972, the multi-modal California Department of  
            Transportation (Caltrans) by consolidating the Department of  









                                                                  AB 1375
                                                                  Page  5


            Public Works and the State Aeronautics Board and establishing  
            six divisions:  transportation planning, highways, mass  
            transportation, aeronautics, administrative services, and  
            legal.  Caltrans manages more than 45,000 miles of  
            California's highway and freeway lanes, provides intercity  
            rail services, permits more than 400 public-use airports and  
            special-use hospital heliports, and works with local agencies.  
             The Caltrans director is appointed by the Governor, and not  
            by the CTC.  

          8)Requires the California Research Bureau, in consultation with  
            specified others, to study the consolidation of various rail  
            functions, including high-speed rail development, currently  
            performed by several distinct state entities.  

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee, likely moderate additional administrative and  
          operating costs associated with establishing a separate  
          department, distinct from the existing authority, to implement  
          the high-speed rail program.  These costs are unknown, but would  
          be in the range of several hundred thousand dollars annually  
          (bond funds).  

           COMMENTS  :  The enactment of AB 3034 (Galgiani) Chapter 267,  
          Statutes of 2008, and the subsequent passage of Proposition 1A  
          by state voters in November 2008, advanced the development and  
          implementation of the state's 800-mile high-speed train project  
          and provided $9.95 billion in bonds for high speed rail and  
          related urban and commuter passenger rail services.   
          Accordingly, there is a need to strengthen the operational and  
          administrative capabilities of the state's high-speed train  
          project management and provide additional state oversight.  

          According to the author, this bill "helps protect the state's  
          interests and establishes further oversight of the activities  
          and use of the funds to be invested in the high-speed train  
          project following voter approval of Proposition 1A, and ensures  
          that an adequate public forum and transparency is maintained  
          regarding the development of the high-speed train project.  This  
          bill creates a new Department of High-Speed Trains (Department)  
          as part of the state government, distinct from the existing  
          Authority, and revises the role of the Authority.  Furthermore,  









                                                                  AB 1375
                                                                  Page  6


          AB 1375 repeals, revises, and reenacts the provisions  
          constituting the Bond Act."  

          Arguments in Support of the bill:  

          1)The intent of this bill is to strengthen the capabilities of  
            the Authority to complete the high-speed train project and to  
            ensure adequate oversight of the state's financial  
            participation and related interests in the project.  This bill  
            is among others currently being considered in legislation that  
            would expand the powers of the Authority or reorganize it.   
            This bill is a good first step in the latter.  

          2)This bill will provide an updated and more suitable  
            administrative and operational structure for the development,  
            construction and implementation of the high-speed train  
            project.  

          3)With the passage of the Bond Act, the need to reorganize and  
            restructure the Authority in preparation of spending over $40  
            billion of federal, state, local, and private monies  
            necessitates this change in management and oversight of the  
            existing governance structure.  

          4)This bill basically follows the governance structure and  
            reporting relationships currently established for the BTHA,  
            CTC, and Caltrans.  This is one of several organizational  
            configurations that should be analyzed.  

          5)Reorganizing the Authority now would better position the state  
            to administer federal economic stimulus funds by prioritizing  
            and allocating funds to the Department for its subsequent  
            budgeting, contracting, expending, and monitoring of the  
            federal and state funds.  

          Arguments Against the bill:  

          1)This bill is premature as the SB 53 (Ducheny) Chapter 53,  
            Statutes of 2008, report was due May 1, 2009, that could  
            contain recommendations for reorganizing the high-speed rail  
            functions of the state.  The report's current due date is  
            February 2010.  









                                                                  AB 1375
                                                                  Page  7



          2)Another approach, as suggested by SB 409 (Ducheny) of 2009,  
            would consolidate the intercity and high-speed rail functions  
            of the state under one department.  As funding and operation  
            for these two separate systems are intertwined, this approach,  
            that would allow closer linkages between the two independent  
            systems, makes some sense in that regard.  

          3)This bill contains distinct differences regarding the  
            selection of the Department director as well as the setting of  
            Department salaries in comparison to the existing selection of  
            the Caltrans director and the setting of Caltrans' employee  
            salaries.  Further, Department's authorization to have 10  
            exempt Governor-appointed positions is questionable and needs  
            justification.  

           
          Analysis Prepared by  :   Ed Imai / TRANS. / (916) 319-2093 

                                                                FN: 0003578