BILL ANALYSIS
AB 1381
Page 1
ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
AB 1381 (John A. Perez)
As Amended April 15, 2009
Majority vote
TRANSPORTATION 9-1 APPROPRIATIONS 14-2
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|Ayes:|Eng, Blumenfield, |Ayes:|De Leon, Nielsen, |
| |Buchanan, Galgiani, | |Ammiano, |
| |Bonnie Lowenthal, Niello, | |Charles Calderon, |
| |John A. Perez, Solorio, | |Krekorian, Fuentes, |
| |Torlakson | |Monning, Harkey, John A. |
| | | |Perez, Price, Skinner, |
| | | |Solorio, |
| | | |Audra Strickland, |
| | | |Torlakson |
| | | | |
|-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
|Nays:|Miller |Nays:|Duvall, Miller |
| | | | |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY : Makes technical corrections to provisions granting
authority to the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation
Authority (Metro) to operate a congestion-pricing demonstration
program (demonstration program). Specifically, this bill :
1)Authorizes the demonstration program on State Route (SR) 10,
in addition to SR 110.
2)Directs, rather than allows, Metro to work with the Department
of the California Highway Patrol (CHP) to implement the
demonstration program.
3)Requires, rather than allows, development of performance
measures for operation of the high-occupancy toll (HOT) lanes
without adverse impacts on other traffic on the state highway
system.
4)Explicitly provides that provisions granting the authority for
the demonstration program do not prevent the California
Department of Transportation (Caltrans) or any local agency
from constructing other facilities in the SR 10 or SR 110
corridors that compete with the demonstration program.
AB 1381
Page 2
5)Declares that Metro is not entitled to compensation for
adverse impacts on toll revenue in the advent a competing
facility is built.
EXISTING LAW authorizes Metro, until January 15, 2013, to
operate a value-pricing and transit development demonstration
program involving HOT lanes. Specifically, existing law:
1)Makes legislative findings and declarations regarding traffic
congestion and air pollution in the Los Angeles region; states
the Legislature's intent that Caltrans consider taking
measures to increase capacity on SR 10, such as re-striping
the existing highway to add an additional lane in each
direction.
2)Also states legislative intent that Metro use a portion of
toll revenue collected on SR 10 to fund a bus maintenance
facility in El Monte.
3)Stipulates that these provisions are not to be construed to
require Caltrans to take any action contrary to federal law.
4)Provides, pursuant to existing authority and to a memorandum
of understanding (MOU) between Metro, the United States
Department of Transportation (USDOT), and Caltrans, that Metro
may operate a value-pricing and transit development
demonstration program involving HOT lanes on SR 10 and SR 110
in Los Angeles County, under the following conditions:
a) Metro and Caltrans must enter into a cooperative
agreement to address all matters related to design,
construction, maintenance, and operation of state highway
facilities in connection with the demonstration program;
b) Vehicles not meeting high-occupancy vehicles (HOV)
occupancy requirements may be authorized to use the HOT
lane facility under conditions set forth by Metro;
c) Metro is prohibited from changing the vehicle occupancy
requirement for access to HOV lanes in these two corridors
for the duration of the demonstration program;
d) Each proposed HOT lane shall have non-tolled alternative
AB 1381
Page 3
lanes available for public use in the same corridor;
e) Metro must initiate a public outreach program to solicit
public input regarding the demonstration program;
f) Metro must work with impact communities to develop
mitigation measures;
g) Metro will set and/or adjust the toll rate but only
after a 30-day public review period;
h) Metro must provide some form of mitigation, such as
reduced tolls, to low-income commuters; and,
i) Toll paying commuters must have the option to purchase
any necessary toll paying equipment and the ability to
prepay tolls and renew toll payments by cash or by using a
credit card.
5)Requires Metro and Caltrans to submit a report to the
Legislature by December 31, 2012, summarizing the
demonstration program and addressing specific elements of the
program.
6)Authorizes operation of the demonstration program until
January 15, 2013, and prohibits Metro from issuing bonds for
the demonstration program during this time.
7)Provides that revenue generated from the demonstration program
may be available to Metro for direct expenses related to
maintenance, administration, and operation of the lanes,
including toll collection, enforcement, and administration.
FISCAL EFFECT : According to the Assembly Appropriations
Committee, negligible fiscal impact.
COMMENTS : The demonstration program, referred to as FastLanes,
is being made possible through a $210 million USDOT grant. The
demonstration program is intended to test innovated strategies
to alleviate congestion, maximize freeway capacity usage, and
fund additional transit alternatives on HOV lanes on SR 10 and
SR 110. The project involves the conversion of HOV lanes on
these corridors to HOT lanes. Additionally, the federal grant
will provide for expanded and upgraded transit improvements
AB 1381
Page 4
along these same two corridors.
In a statement issued last year upon signing a MOU approving the
project, USDOT Secretary, Mary Peters, issued a statement
citing, "I am announcing that Los Angeles has been selected to
receive $210.6 million in federal Congestion Reduction funds.
This money will make commuting faster, air cleaner, and transit
better. These funds will provide the financial leverage this
region needs to begin converting up to eighty-five miles of
local HOV lanes into new, more reliable high occupancy toll - or
HOT - lanes." According to Secretary Peters, the Los Angeles
region had until October 15, 2008, to obtain the legislative
authority needed to participate in the demonstration program.
According to the author, this need for quick legislative
sanctioning precluded the ability to make technical changes or
incorporate recommended amendments to enabling legislation. AB
1381 provides those changes.
Analysis Prepared by : Janet Dawson / TRANS. / (916) 319-2093
FN: 0000477