BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 1393
                                                                  Page  1


          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
          AB 1393 (Skinner)
          As Amended  April 23, 2009
          Majority vote 

           HIGHER EDUCATION    9-0         APPROPRIATIONS      16-0        
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Portantino, Conway,       |Ayes:|De Leon, Nielsen,         |
          |     |Block, Cook, Fong,        |     |Ammiano,                  |
          |     |Galgiani,, Huber, Ma,     |     |Charles Calderon,         |
          |     |Ruskin                    |     |Krekorian, Duvall,        |
          |     |                          |     |Fuentes, Monning, Harkey, |
          |     |                          |     |Miller, John A. Perez,    |
          |     |                          |     |Price, Skinner, Solorio,  |
          |     |                          |     |Audra Strickland,         |
          |     |                          |     |Torlakson                 |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 

           SUMMARY  :  Requests the California Community Colleges (CCC) and  
          the University of California (UC), and requires the California  
          State University (CSU), in order to ensure stable housing for  
          current and former foster youth, to give priority for campus  
          housing to current and former foster youth with first priority  
          for housing open for uninterrupted year-round occupation and  
          next priority for housing open for occupation most days during  
          the calendar year.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :   According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee, CSU indicates no fiscal impact.  To the extent UC and  
          CCC decide to give priority for campus housing to former foster  
          youth, administrative costs should be minor and absorbable.  

           COMMENTS  :   It is estimated that more than 20,000 youth aged 16  
          and older transition from the foster care system each year.   
          According to a 2007 report by the Children's Advocacy Institute,  
          65% of foster youth emancipate from the system without a place  
          to live, 51% are unemployed, and 46% have not completed high  
          school.  A college degree is one of the best roads to  
          self-sufficiency; however, few foster youth continue education  
          after high school and those that do often encounter significant  
          barriers that hinder their ability to succeed.  Fewer than 10%  
          of foster youth who graduate from high school go on to college,  
          and fewer than 3% of foster youth who go on to college ever  








                                                                  AB 1393
                                                                  Page  2


          graduate.  This bill seeks to provide priority housing for  
          former and current foster youth on CCC, CSU, and UC campuses.   
          Many former foster youth lack permanent relationships after  
          leaving care, and even if they are fortunate enough to obtain  
          campus housing, they have no place to live between semesters and  
          school years.  Providing priority housing and first priority for  
          housing open year-round will help provide former and current  
          foster youth with added stability in their quest to succeed in  
          college.
           
           Why request CCC and UC to comply?  While CSU is required to  
          comply with the provisions of this bill, CCC and UC are only  
          requested to comply.  Ten CCC campuses maintain dormitories,  
          thus the author believes the CCCs should provide priority  
          housing to foster youth.  However, requesting rather than  
          requiring the CCCs to comply avoids a state-mandated cost  
          associated with this bill.  The author requests UC to comply  
          with the provisions of this bill as the California Constitution  
          (Section 9 of Article IX) establishes that the UC is subject to  
          legislative control only to the degree necessary to ensure the  
          security of its funds and compliance with the terms of its  
          endowments.   
           

          Analysis Prepared by:    Laura Metune / HIGHER ED. / (916)  
          319-3960 
                                                                FN: 0000487