BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 1405
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   May 13, 2009

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Kevin De Leon, Chair

                   AB 1405 (De Leon) - As Amended:  April 28, 2009 

          Policy Committee:                              Natural  
          ResourcesVote:6-3

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          No     Reimbursable:              No

           SUMMARY  

          This bill dedicates a portion of funds generated by AB 32 fees  
          disadvantaged communities for projects that mitigate or adapt to  
          climate change.  Specifically, this bill:

          1)Establishes the Community Benefits Fund (CBF) in the State  
            Treasury for deposit of an as-of-yet unspecified percentage of  
            fee revenue collected pursuant to AB 32.

          2)Specify that funds in the CBF support competitive grants for  
            projects in the most impacted and disadvantaged communities,  
            as identified by ARB and other specified agencies, that reduce  
            greenhouse gases (GHGs) or help cope with climate change.

          3)Requires ARB, the California Energy Commission (CEC), and the  
            Department of Public Health (DPH) to jointly develop  
            semiannual plans for the use of funds under this section.

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          1)One-time costs to ARB of approximately $350,000 to develop a  
            methodology to identify the most impacted and disadvantaged  
            communities.  (APCF)

          2)Minor, absorbable costs to ARB, CEC and DPH to develop  
            semiannual plans. 

          3)Potential shift in funds, possibly in the hundreds of millions  
            of dollars annually, from the APFC to the CBF created by this  
            bill, to the extent ARB adopts an AB 32 fee that produces  
            revenue and depending on the percentage of revenue directed to  








                                                                  AB 1405
                                                                  Page  2

            the CBF in future iterations of this bill.

           COMMENTS  

           1)Rationale.   AB 32 requires ARB to ensure that GHG emission  
            reduction measures under its jurisdiction direct public and  
            private investment toward the most disadvantaged communities  
            in California and provide an opportunity for small businesses,  
            schools, affordable housing associations, and other community  
            institutions to participate in, and benefit from, statewide  
            efforts to reduce GHG emissions.  ARB has yet to propose how  
            it will meet this requirement.  The author contends this bill  
            provides direction to ensure that ARB meets these AB 32  
            requirements.


           
          2)Background.  

              a)   AB 32 Emissions Limit.   AB 32 requires California to  
               limit its emissions of GHGs so that, by 2020, those  
               emissions are equal to what they were in 1990. To that end,  
               AB 32 requires ARB to quantify the state's 1990 GHG  
               emissions and to adopt, by January 1, 2009, a "scoping  
               plan" that describes the board's plan for achieving the  
               maximum technologically feasible and cost-effective  
               reductions of GHG emissions reductions by 2020. 
             
                In keeping with AB 32, ARB adopted its AB 32 scoping plan  
               in December of 2008.  Consistent with AB 32, the scoping  
               plan includes both direct regulatory measures and  
               market-based compliance mechanisms, such as emissions taxes  
               and a "cap-and-trade" emissions allowance program.

              b)   AB 32 Provides Fee Authority to ARB.   AB 32 authorizes,  
               but does not require, ARB to adopt fees to be paid by the  
               sources of GHG emissions.  The statute directs that fee  
               revenues be deposited into the APFC.  

               Thus far, ARB has proposed to use its fee authority only to  
               fund state agencies' AB 32 implementation costs and to  
               repay currently outstanding AB 32 loans from other state  
               funds.  The fee revenue necessary for these purposes is  
               estimated at $55 million per year.  ARB is scheduled to  
               adopt the AB 32 fee in June 2009.  








                                                                  AB 1405
                                                                  Page  3

                                
               ARB may generate additional revenue as a result of its use  
               of market-based mechanisms to limit GHG emissions.  This  
               revenue, potentially in the hundreds of millions of  
               dollars, may result from the auction of cap-and-trade  
               emission allowances or from the imposition of an emissions  
               tax.
                
             c)   Air Pollution Control Fund.   The money in the APCF is  
               available to ARB to carry out its air pollution control  
               duties.  Revenues in the fund mainly result from penalties  
               paid by manufacturers or distributors of motor vehicles for  
               violations of regulations, cargo tank certification and  
               direct import vehicle certification fees, penalties for  
               violation of abatement orders and regulations, and various  
               fees imposed on non-vehicular sources of air emissions.

           3)Related Legislation.   AB 231 (Huffman), also before this  
            committee, creates a Climate Protection Trust Fund for the  
            deposit of fee revenue collected for the implementation of AB  
            32 and directs the use of those monies.  AB 231 passed Natural  
            Resources on a vote of 6-3.

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Jay Dickenson / APPR. / (916) 319-2081