BILL ANALYSIS
AB 1429
Page 1
Date of Hearing: May 6, 2009
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Kevin De Leon, Chair
AB 1429 (Evans) - As Amended: April 14, 2009
Policy Committee: P.E.R. &
S.S.Vote: 4-2
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
No Reimbursable:
SUMMARY
This bill provides managerial employees the right to meet and
confer with their employer on matters relating to employee
compensation, including hours, benefits, and wages.
Specifically, the bill:
1)Defines "meet and confer" to mean that, before determining a
policy affecting compensation of managerial employees, the
state will consider as fully as it deems reasonable any
presentation made by the organization representing managerial
employees.
2)Specifies that the final decision regarding managerial
compensation will be the sole responsibility of the state.
3)Specifies that the provisions do not apply to managerial
employees within the Department of Personnel Administration
(DPA).
FISCAL EFFECT
1)The Department of Personnel Administration (DPA) indicates
that the expanded meet and confer rights would require at
least two additional negotiator positions, at an annual cost
of $200,000.
2)Cost pressure, potentially in the millions of dollars, to the
extent enhanced meet and confer rights result in compensation
increases for managers.
COMMENTS
AB 1429
Page 2
1)Background . Existing law establishes the Bill of Rights for
State Excluded Employees, requiring the state to meet and
confer upon request with representatives of supervisory
employees on policies or actions affecting the supervisory
employees. The same meet-and-confer rights are not granted to
higher-level managerial employees. According to DPA, the
rationale for this is that inclusion of higher-level
management would create an inherent conflict to the extent
that the higher level managers are responsible for carrying
out state personnel policies.
2)Purpose . According to the author, the bill is intended to
address an inequity where a manager promoted from rank and
file may earn less than individuals he or she manages. The
author claims that "as an excluded employee, the manager has
fewer rights than the individuals he or she manages and, in
fact, does not have rights equal to the supervisory employees
with his or her office. As a result, managerial employees have
experienced increased workload, higher supervisory ratios, and
fewer pay increases than the employees they supervise."
Analysis Prepared by : Brad Williams / APPR. / (916) 319-2081