BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                               AB 1438
                                                                       

                      SENATE COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
                        Senator S. Joseph Simitian, Chairman
                              2009-2010 Regular Session
                                           
           BILL NO:    AB 1438
           AUTHOR:     Conway
           AMENDED:    June 26, 2009
           FISCAL:     Yes               HEARING DATE:     July 6, 2009
           URGENCY:    No                CONSULTANT:       Rachel Machi  
           Wagoner
            
           SUBJECT  :    SAFE DRINKING WATER STATE REVOLVING FUND

            SUMMARY  :    
             
            Existing federal law  :

           1)Under the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), authorizes the  
             United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) to  
             set national health-based standards for drinking water to  
             protect against both naturally-occurring and man-made  
             contaminants that may be found in drinking water.  US EPA,  
             states, and water systems then work together to make sure  
             that these standards are met.  Originally, SDWA focused  
             primarily on treatment as the means of providing safe  
             drinking water at the tap.  The 1996 amendments greatly  
             enhanced the existing law by recognizing source water  
             protection, operator training, funding for water system  
             improvements, and public information as important components  
             to ensuring the quality of drinking water.  The 1996  
             amendments also established the Drinking Water State  
             Revolving Fund to provide states with a financing mechanism  
             to ensure safe drinking water to the public.

           2)Under, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009  
             (ARRA), provides approximately $160 million to the Revolving  
             Fund for infrastructure development for California's  
             drinking water systems.

            Existing state law  :

           1)Under the California Safe Drinking Water Act, requires the  
             Department of Public Health (DPH) to regulate drinking  
             water, including conducting research, studies, and  








                                                               AB 1438
                                                                 Page 2

             demonstration programs for a dependable, safe supply of  
             drinking water and to enforce the federal Safe Drinking  
             Water Act and other regulations.

           2)Creates the Safe Drinking Water State Revolving Fund  
             (Revolving Fund) in the State Treasury and continuously  
             appropriates the fund to DPH to provide grants or revolving  
             fund loans for the design and construction of projects for  
             public water systems that will enable suppliers to meet safe  
             drinking water standards.

            This bill  expands eligibility for grants under the Revolving  
           Fund to:

           1)Add fire flow demand as a criterion that must be considered  
             when determining "reasonable amount of growth" for project  
             funding under the Revolving Fund.

           2)Require DPH, in order to implement the State Revolving Fund,  
             to establish a wellhead protection account pursuant to  
             Section 1452(a) (2) of the SDWA.

           3)Add environmental documentation as an activity eligible for  
             funding under the State Revolving Fund.

           4)Revise, from $1 million to an amount established by DPH, the  
             maximum amount of a grant permitted under the State  
             Revolving Fund for the planning, engineering studies,  
             environmental documentation, design or construction of a  
             single project.  The amount must be published in the  
             Intended Use Plan submitted by DPH annually to the US EPA.

            COMMENTS :

            1)Purpose of Bill  .  According to the sponsor, this bill seeks  
             to provide updated authority to DPH on the administration  
             and use of funds from the State Revolving Fund.  Most  
             notably to provide them the continuous authority to raise  
             the grant cap for planning and construction projects through  
             their administrative regulatory process.  They are currently  
             limited by statute to a maximum of $1 million.  In order to  
             maintain a rate of affordability, DPH packages the loans  
             with a partial grant to make the projects more viable.  Due  
             to the increasing costs of these projects, the need for a  








                                                               AB 1438
                                                                 Page 3

             greater grant amount is needed to make these projects more  
             viable, especially for disadvantaged communities.  In  
             addition, instead of having to update statutorily the amount  
             every few years, it is more efficient for DPH to do so  
             administratively in accordance with US EPA guidance.
            2)Removing the cap on grants  .  By revising, from $1 million to  
             an amount established by DPH, the maximum amount of a grant  
             permitted under the State Revolving Fund for the planning,  
             engineering studies, environmental documentation, design or  
             construction of a single project, the legislature is giving  
             open-ended authority to DPH to grant funds from the  
             Revolving Fund. While the current $1 million cap may be  
             causing DPH to pass over valuable and needed projects, in  
             order to ensure equality in grant awards it may be more  
             appropriate to limit this flexibility by requiring DPH to  
             make certain findings concerning the need of the community  
             and project when awarding higher grants, and rather than  
             completely removing the cap, raise it to be more consistent  
             with current need.

            3)Clarification needed regarding Environmental Documentation  .   
             Since environmental documentation is required prior to  
             submittal of an application, clarification is needed  
             regarding the timing of this funding.
            
            4)Prior Legislation.  SB 27XXX (Negrete McLeod) Chapter 25,  
             Statutes of 2009-10 Third Extraordinary Session, expanded  
             authorized uses for clean drinking water and wastewater  
             funding from the federal government. 

            SOURCE  :         California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation
                           Clean Water Action
                           Environmental Justice Coalition for Water
            
           SUPPORT  :       None of file
            
           OPPOSITION  :    None on file