BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 1443
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   May 20, 2009

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Kevin De Leon, Chair

           AB 1443 (Committee on Water, Parks and Wildlife) - As Amended:   
                                    May 6, 2009 

          Policy Committee:                              WPW  Vote:13-0

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          Yes    Reimbursable:              No

           SUMMARY  

          This bill makes several changes to the Fish and Game Code to  
          facilitate effective enforcement of California's fish and game  
          laws.  Specifically, this bill:

          1)Authorizes the director of the Department of Fish and Game  
            (DFG) to enter into reciprocal operational agreements with  
            authorized representatives from Oregon, Nevada or Arizona  
            state law enforcement agencies to promote law enforcement  
            service in the state border areas. 

          2)Clarifies existing law that makes it unlawful to violate fish  
            and game regulations contained in Title 14 of the California  
            Code of Regulations, and makes a violation of these regulatory  
            provisions punishable as provided in Section 12000 of the Fish  
            and Game Code.

          3)Authorizes DFG to apply to the clerk of the appropriate court  
            for a judgment to collect an administrative civil penalty  
            imposed pursuant to existing provisions of law, after the  
            expiration of the time period to appeal the penalty has  
            passed.

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          Negligible costs, if any.

           COMMENTS  

           1)Rationale  .  The author contends this bill will enhance the  
            effective enforcement of the state's fish and game laws and  








                                                                  AB 1443
                                                                  Page  2

            increase cost recovery.  

           2)Background.     

             a)   Borderline Law Enforcement.    Watersheds and roads  
               oftentimes do not follow state boundaries.  Yet, according  
               to the author, fish and game wardens sometimes need  
               immediate assistance from fish and game law enforcement  
               personnel in neighboring states to respond to poaching or  
               such crimes or for emergency services.  However, these law  
               enforcement personnel from outside California usually have  
               no authority inside California, complicating law  
               enforcement and, in the gravest situations, endangering  
               lives.  

             b)   It's Illegal to Be Unlawful.   In keeping with existing  
               law and legislative intent, many of California's fish and  
               game rules are established in regulations adopted by the  
               Fish and Game Commission and codified in the California  
               Code of Regulations.  According to the author, some local  
               prosecutors nonetheless have been at times reluctant to  
               prosecute violations of fish and game rules because they  
               are specified in regulations rather than in statute.  
           
           
          Analysis Prepared by  :    Jay Dickenson / APPR. / (916) 319-2081