BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 1494
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   May 6, 2009

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Kevin De Leon, Chair

                     AB 1494 (Eng) - As Amended:  April 13, 2009 

          Policy Committee:                              Governmental  
          Organization Vote:                            16 - 0

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          No     Reimbursable:              

           SUMMARY  

          This bill amends the Bagley-Keene Open Meetings Act's definition  
          of a "meeting" in order to conform to a recent court decision.   
          Specifically, this bill:

          1)States that a majority of members of a state body shall not,  
            outside of a meeting, use a series of communications of any  
            kind, directly or through intermediaries, to discuss,  
            deliberate, or take action on any item of business that is  
            within the subject matter of the body.

          2)Clarifies that an employee or official of a state agency can  
            engage in a separate conversation or communication with a  
            member of a legislative body in order to answer questions or  
            provide information regarding a matter under the agency's  
            jurisdiction, as long as that person does not communicate to  
            members of the legislative body the comments or position of  
            any other member or members. 


           FISCAL EFFECT  

          There are no significant costs associated with this legislation.

           COMMENTS  

           1)Rationale  .  This bill is intended to close a loopehole in the  
            Bagley-Keene Act that allows for serial meetings to legally  
            take place. The loophole stems from a 2006 California  
            appellate court ruling in Wolfe v. City of Fremont (2006, 144  
            Cal. App. 4th 533) that declared a member who went to a  








                                                                  AB 1494
                                                                  Page  2

            majority of members in individual meetings to discuss a public  
            issue did not violate that serial meetings provision, unless  
            the communication actually resulted in a decision of the  
            board. 

            This bill prohibits a majority of members of a state body from  
            using a series of communications of any kind through group or  
            individual contact, directly or through intermediaries, to  
            discuss, deliberate, or take action on any item of business  
            that is within the subject matter of that state agency, board  
            or commission.  
           
          2)Bagley-Keene Open Meetings Act  . The Bagley-Keene Open Meetings  
            Act provides the state's rules and regulations for open and  
            public meetings. The Bagley-Keene Act sets up the rules for  
            all state agencies, boards, and commissions on state meetings,  
            ensures they are open to the public, and establishes the  
            boundaries within which those entities operate.

            Within the Bagley-Keene Act there are rules for avoiding  
            serial meetings. A serial meeting occurs when a majority of  
            members of a state agency, board or commission, through a  
            series of communications each involving less than a majority,  
            discuss, deliberate, or take action on a current or future  
            agenda item.
           
          3)Related Legislation  . SB 1732 (Romero; Chapter 63, Statutes of  
            2008) prohibits a majority of the members of a local  
            legislative body, outside of a meeting authorized by the Brown  
            Act, from using a series of communications of any kind,  
            directly or through intermediaries, to discuss, deliberate, or  
            take action on any item of business that is within the subject  
            matter jurisdiction of the legislative body.  

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Julie Salley-Gray / APPR. / (916)  
          319-2081