BILL ANALYSIS
AB 1496
Page 1
Date of Hearing: May 6, 2009
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Kevin De Leon, Chair
AB 1496 (Skinner) - As Amended: April 20, 2009
Policy Committee: Business and
Profession Vote: 7-1
Natural Resources 8-1
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
No Reimbursable:
SUMMARY
This bill establishes sanctions for contractors who fail to
comply with energy efficiency standards. Specifically, this
bill:
1)Subjects an unlicensed contractor who fails to comply with
building energy efficiency to a civil penalty of at least
$2,000 in addition to any other penalties allowable under
current law.
2)Makes failure of a licensed contractor to comply with energy
efficiency standards grounds for disciplinary action.
3)Makes a licensee, who fails to obtain a permit prior to
performing work involving energy efficiency standards, subject
to a citation and civil penalty of at least $500.
4)Requires the Contractors' State License Board (CSLB),
commencing January 1, 2010 and annually thereafter, to report
the number of civil penalties issued pursuant to (1) and (3)
above.
5)Requires the California Energy Commission (CEC) to collaborate
with the CSLB to identify and investigate the failure of
contractors to comply with building energy efficiency
standards.
FISCAL EFFECT
1)Minor absorbable special costs to the CSLB for additional
AB 1496
Page 2
enforcement and the annual report, offset to some extent by
additional revenue from civil penalties.
2)Ongoing special fund costs of about $250,000 to the CEC for
two staff to assist the CSLB with enforcement. [Energy
Resources Programs Account]
COMMENTS
1)Purpose . According to the author, effective application of
California's building energy efficiency standards will
increase energy efficiency and reduce the impact of global
warming.
"To realize this goal, energy efficiency standards must be
enforced. Contractors should be installing products that help
reduce energy consumption, such as cool roofing material or
having ducts tested for leaks when a central air conditioner
or furnace is installed or replaced as is required by
California regulations."
2)Prior Legislation . In 2008, an almost identical bill, AB 2479
(Hancock) was one of numerous bills summarily vetoed by the
governor without a stated objection.
In 2007, a bill that included similar provisions, AB 785
(Hancock) was vetoed due to other provisions that the governor
found objectionable. In his veto message, the governor
positively commented on the provisions of that bill that are
included in AB 1496.
Analysis Prepared by : Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916) 319-2081