BILL NUMBER: AB 1516	AMENDED
	BILL TEXT

	AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY  APRIL 20, 2009

INTRODUCED BY   Assembly Member Lieu

                        FEBRUARY 27, 2009

   An act to amend Section 1054.3 of the Penal Code, relating to
criminal procedure.


	LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST


   AB 1516, as amended, Lieu. Criminal procedure: discovery.
   Existing law provides that no discovery shall occur in criminal
cases except as provided by statute or as mandated by the
Constitution of the United States. Under existing law, a defendant
and his or her attorney are required to disclose to the prosecuting
attorney any reports or statements of experts made in connection with
the case, including the results of physical or mental examinations,
scientific tests, experiments, or comparisons which the defendant
intends to offer in evidence at the trial. 
   This bill would grant the prosecution access to a criminal
defendant for the purposes of having a prosecution expert conduct a
mental health examination whenever a defendant places his or her
mental state at the time of the crime in issue by plea or by giving
notice of his or her intention to call a mental health expert at
trial. The bill would make the defendant's or his or her counsel's
refusal to do so admissible as evidence at trial.  
   This bill would require the court to order a defendant in a
criminal action or a minor in a juvenile delinquency proceeding to
submit to examination by a prosecution-retained mental health expert
whenever a defendant or minor, as specified, places in issue his or
her mental state at any phase of the criminal action or juvenile
proceeding through the proposed testimony of any mental health
expert. The bill would specify that its purpose is to respond to
Verdin v. Superior Court (2008) 43 Cal.4th 1096, as specified. 
   This bill would amend Proposition 115, an initiative statute
adopted by the voters at the June 5, 1990, statewide primary
election, which provides that its provisions may be amended by the
Legislature by a 2/3 vote of the membership of each house.
   Vote: 2/3. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: no. State-mandated
local program: no.


THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

  SECTION 1.  Section 1054.3 of the Penal Code is amended to read:
   1054.3.  (a) The defendant and his or her attorney shall disclose
to the prosecuting attorney:
   (1) The names and addresses of persons, other than the defendant,
he or she intends to call as witnesses at trial, together with any
relevant written or recorded statements of those persons, or reports
of the statements of those persons, including any reports or
statements of experts made in connection with the case, and including
the results of physical or mental examinations, scientific tests,
experiments, or comparisons which the defendant intends to offer in
evidence at the trial.
   (2) Any real evidence which the defendant intends to offer in
evidence at the trial. 
   (b) Whenever a defendant places his or her mental state at the
time of the crime in issue by plea or by giving notice of his or her
intention to call a mental health expert at trial, the defendant and
his or her attorney shall, upon the prosecuting attorney's request,
grant access for purposes of a mental health examination of the
defendant by the prosecuting attorney's expert. The defendant's or
his or her counsel's refusal to do so is admissible as evidence at
trial.  
   (b) (1) Unless otherwise specifically addressed by an existing
provision of law, whenever a defendant in a criminal action or a
minor in a juvenile proceeding brought pursuant to a petition
alleging the juvenile to be within Section 602 of the Welfare and
Institutions Code places in issue his or her mental state at any
phase of the criminal action or juvenile proceeding through the
proposed testimony of any mental health expert, upon timely request
by the prosecution, the court shall order that the defendant or
juvenile submit to examination by a prosecution-retained mental
health expert. The prosecution shall bear the cost of any such mental
health expert's fees for examination and testimony at a criminal
trial or juvenile court proceeding.  
   (2) The purpose of this subdivision is to respond to Verdin v.
Superior Court 43 Cal.4th 1096, which held that only the Legislature
may authorize a court to order the appointment of a prosecution
mental health expert when a defendant has placed his or her mental
state at issue in a criminal case or juvenile proceeding pursuant to
Section 602 of the Welfare and Institutions Code.