BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 1536
                                                                  Page  1


          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
          AB 1536 (Blakeslee)
          As Amended May 6, 2009
          Majority vote 

           UTILITIES AND COMMERCE           15-0               NATURAL  
          RESOURCES             6-1                           
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Fuentes, Duvall, Tom      |Ayes:|Skinner, Gilmore,         |
          |     |Berryhill, Blakeslee, De  |     |Brownley, Chesbro, Hill,  |
          |     |La Torre, Carter, Fong,   |     |Knight                    |
          |     |Fuller, Furutani,         |     |                          |
          |     |Huffman, Krekorian,       |     |                          |
          |     |Skinner, Smyth, Swanson,  |     |                          |
          |     |Torrico                   |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |     |                          |Nays:|De Leon                   |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           APPROPRIATIONS      15-0                                        
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|De Leon, Nielsen Ammiano, |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |     |Charles Calderon, Davis,  |     |                          |
          |     |Duvall, Fuentes, Hall,    |     |                          |
          |     |Harkey, John A. Perez,    |     |                          |
          |     |Price, Skinner, Solorio,  |     |                          |
          |     |Audra Strickland,         |     |                          |
          |     |Torlakson                 |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY  :  Expands eligibility for Self-Generation Incentive  
          Program (SGIP) rebates to include energy storage facilities.    
          Specifically,  this bill  :  

           1)Changes the name of SGIP to the Clean Technology Incentive  
            Program (CTIP). 

          2)Provides that energy storage facilities using emerging  
            technologies and meeting other specified criteria, including  








                                                                  AB 1536
                                                                  Page  2


            that the facilities store energy from an eligible renewable  
            resource, are eligible for the CTIP.

          3)Limits annual program spending to $75 million.

           EXISTING LAW  :   

          1)Authorizes the California Public Utilities Commission (PUC) to  
            administer SGIP to provide rebates for distributed generation  
            electricity generators.

          2)Restricts SGIP-eligible technologies to wind and fuel cells  
            distributed generation technologies that meet or exceed  
            specific emissions standards.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee, minor absorbable costs for the PUC to implement the  
          program modifications.

           COMMENTS  :  According to the author, the purpose of this bill is  
          to create incentives for merchant-owned energy storage  
          facilities.  The author believes these energy storage facilities  
          will be necessary for California to meet its renewable energy  
          goals since they can store energy produced by wind and solar  
          facilities at times that electricity is not needed to be used at  
          peak periods when demand for electricity is high. 

          California law requires all retail sellers of electricity to  
          meet at least 20% of the retail sales using electricity from  
          renewable resources by 2010 - a Renewable Portfolio Standard  
          (RPS).  The California Air Resources Board has identified an  
          advancement of RPS to 33% by 2020 as one of the key actions  
          needed to be taken in order to meet the greenhouse gas reduction  
          goals of AB 32 (Nunez), Chapter 488, Statutes of 2006.  Two  
          bills have been introduced this legislative session to create  
          the 33% RPS goals:  AB 64 (Krekorian) and SB 14 (Simitian). 

          While several studies have determined that a 33% RPS is  
          achievable, it can only be met with a heavy reliance on wind and  
          solar energy.  The problem is that both resources are  
          intermittent. They only produce electricity when the wind is  
          blowing or the sun is out.  This intermittency could create  
          reliability problems for the electricity grid since the grid  
          managers cannot count on the solar and wind energy being  








                                                                  AB 1536
                                                                  Page  3


          available at the same time there is demand for electricity.  

          One way to resolve this reliability problem is to build more  
          electric generation facilities that are capable of turning on  
          and off quickly and can be available when the renewable energy  
          facilities are not operating.  These facilities are referred to  
          as "peaker plants."  They generally run on natural gas.  They  
          are also relatively expensive to operate compared to other  
          generating facilities that operate around the clock. 

          Another approach would be to find ways to store the electrical  
          output of renewable facilities to use hours later.  The storage  
          devices could help take the place of peaker plants. 

          This bill attempts to help promote the development of new energy  
          storage devices by allowing the PUC award rebates to new storage  
          devices out of an existing program that subsidizes distributed  
          generation technologies.  To be eligible for the rebates the  
          storage facility must use an emerging technology that is not in  
          commercial use and the facility must  store energy generated  
          from an eligible renewable resource during off-peak periods and  
          dispatched the energy during on-peak periods.

           
          Analysis Prepared by  :    Edward Randolph / U. & C. / (916)  
          319-2083 


                                                                FN: 0000936