BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                               AB 1581
                                                                       

                      SENATE COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
                        Senator S. Joseph Simitian, Chairman
                              2009-2010 Regular Session
                                           
           BILL NO:    AB 1581
           AUTHOR:     Torres
           AMENDED:    June 23, 2010
           FISCAL:     Yes               HEARING DATE:     June 28, 2010
           URGENCY:    No                CONSULTANT:       Randy Pestor
            
           SUBJECT  :    CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT

            SUMMARY :    
           
            Existing law  , under the California Environmental Quality Act  
           (CEQA):

           1) Requires lead agencies with the principal responsibility  
              for carrying out or approving a proposed project to prepare  
              a negative declaration, mitigated declaration, or  
              environmental impact report (EIR) for this action, unless  
              the project is exempt from CEQA (CEQA includes various  
              statutory exemptions, as well as categorical exemptions in  
              the CEQA guidelines).  (Public Resources Code 21000).

           2) Requires a lead agency to call at least one scoping meeting  
              for a proposed project that may affect highways or other  
              facilities under Department of Transportation (Caltrans)  
              jurisdiction, if requested by Caltrans, or for a project of  
              statewide, regional, or areawide significance.  (21083.9).  
               Notice of at least one scoping meeting must be provided to  
              the following:

              a)    A county or city that borders on the county or city  
                 within which the project is located, unless otherwise  
                 designated annually by agreement.

              b)    A responsible agency.

              c)    A public agency that has jurisdiction by law with  
                 respect to the project.

              d)    A transportation planning agency and public agencies  









                                                               AB 1581
                                                                 Page 2

                 having transportation facilities within the  
                 jurisdiction.

              e)    An organization or individual who has filed a written  
                 request for notice.

            This bill  also requires a scoping meeting notice to be  
           provided to any entity that has filed a written request for  
           the notice and is not otherwise required to receive notice  
           (under a) to d) above).
            
           COMMENTS  :

            1) Purpose of Bill  .  Under CEQA, a scoping meeting notice must  
              be provided to certain public agencies.  An organization or  
              individual may file a written request to receive the  
              notice, but there is no provision allowing an entity to  
              receive a scoping meeting notice upon request if that  
              entity is not otherwise required to receive notice - such  
              as a special district or nearby city that does not border  
              the county or city within which the project is located.  AB  
              1581 provides an opportunity for these entities to file a  
              written request to receive the scoping meeting notice.  

            2) Brief background on CEQA  .  CEQA provides a process for  
              evaluating the environmental effects of a project, and  
              includes statutory exemptions, as well as categorical  
              exemptions in the CEQA guidelines.  If a project is not  
              exempt from CEQA, an initial study is prepared to determine  
              whether a project may have a significant effect on the  
              environment.  If the initial study shows that there would  
              not be a significant effect on the environment, the lead  
              agency must prepare a negative declaration.  If the initial  
              study shows that the project may have a significant effect  
              on the environment, the lead agency must prepare an EIR.

           Generally, an EIR must accurately describe the proposed  
              project, identify and analyze each significant  
              environmental impact expected to result from the proposed  
              project, identify mitigation measures to reduce those  
              impacts to the extent feasible, and evaluate a range of  
              reasonable alternatives to the proposed project.  Prior to  










                                                               AB 1581
                                                                 Page 3

              approving any project that has received environmental  
              review, an agency must make certain findings.  If  
              mitigation measures are required or incorporated into a  
              project, the agency must adopt a reporting or monitoring  
              program to ensure compliance with those measures.

           If a mitigation measure would cause one or more significant  
              effects in addition to those that would be caused by the  
              proposed project, the effects of the mitigation measure  
              must be discussed but in less detail than the significant  
              effects of the proposed project.

            3) Improving agency involvement in CEQA process  .  According to  
              the CEQA guidelines, early consultation "solves many  
              potential problems that would arise in more serious forms  
              later in the review process."  The guidelines also provide  
              that scoping "has been helpful to agencies in identifying  
              the range of actions, alternatives, mitigation measures,  
              and significant effects to be analyzed in depth in an EIR  
              and in eliminating from detailed study issues found not to  
              be important."  The guidelines further note that scoping  
              "has been found to be an effective way to bring together  
              and resolve the concerns of affected federal, state, and  
              local agencies, the proponent of the action, and other  
              interested persons including those who might not be in  
              accord with the action on environmental grounds."

           As noted above, AB 1581 enables an entity to file a written  
              request for a scoping meeting notice if that entity is not  
              otherwise required to receive the notice.

           If AB 1581 is amended to address other CEQA issues, then this  
              bill will need to be reheard by the Environmental Quality  
              Committee.

            SOURCE  :        Assemblymember Torres  

           SUPPORT  :       None on file 

           OPPOSITION  :    None on file