BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 1584
                                                                  Page  1

          CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS
          AB 1584 (Public Employees Committee)
          As Amended September 1, 2009
          2/3 vote.  Urgency
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |ASSEMBLY:  |72-0 |(July 16, 2009) |SENATE: |38-0 |(September 3,  |
          |           |     |                |        |     |2009)          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
            
           Original Committee Reference:   P.E.,R.& S.S.  

           SUMMARY  :  Requires all public pension systems to adopt a policy  
          requiring the disclosure of fees paid to investment placement  
          agents, requires the disclosure of campaign contributions and  
          gifts made by placement agents to public retirement board  
          members, as specified, prohibits public retirement board members  
          from selling investment products to other public retirement  
          systems, and lengthens post-employment restrictions on  
          influencing retirement board actions for former system  
          executives and board members that currently apply to the  
          California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) and to  
          the California State Teachers' Retirement System (CalSTRS) and  
          extends those expanded provisions to apply to all public  
          retirement systems in California.  Specifically,  this bill  :  

          1)Requires public retirement system boards to develop and  
            implement, on or before June 30, 2010, a policy requiring the  
            disclosure of payments to placement agents in connection with  
            system investments with external investment managers.

          2)Prohibits an external investment manager or placement agent  
            that violates the board's disclosure policy from soliciting  
            new investments from the system for five years from the time  
            of violation but allows the board to reduce this by a majority  
            vote, in open session, upon the showing of good cause.

          3)Prohibits a public retirement system from entering into any  
            agreement with an external investment manager that does not  
            provide written consent to comply with the disclosure policy.

          4)Provides that the board does not have to take action as  
            described above unless the board determines, in good faith,  
            that the action described above is consistent with the  
            fiduciary responsibilities of the board as described in  








                                                                  AB 1584
                                                                  Page  2

            Section 17 of Article XVI of the California Constitution.

          5)Requires placement agents to disclose to the retirement board  
            all campaign contributions he or she has made to any elected  
            member of the board during the prior 24-month period before  
            attempting to place any system investments, and to disclose  
            any subsequent campaign contribution during the time the  
            placement agent is receiving compensation in connection with a  
            system investment.

          6)Requires placement agents to disclose all gifts he or she has  
            made to any member of the board during the prior 24-month  
            period before attempting to place any system investments, and  
            to disclose any subsequent gifts given during the time the  
            placement agent is receiving compensation in connection with a  
            system investment.

          7)Prohibits a member or employee of the board from, directly or  
            indirectly, by himself or herself, or as an agent, partner, or  
            employee of a person or entity other than the board, selling  
            or providing any investment product that would be considered  
            an asset of the fund to any public retirement system in  
            California.

          8)Expands current provisions that apply to CalPERS and CalSTRS  
            that prohibit high level officers and investment staff, who  
            have been in those positions for less than five years, from  
            acting as agents before the boards or staff for a period of  
            two years after leaving the retirement system, by removing the  
            five year limitation and including board members, deputy  
            executive officers and assistant officers to the list of staff  
            subject to these provisions.

          9)Applies these expanded provisions to all public pension plans  
            in California.

          10)Contains an urgency clause, allowing this bill to take effect  
            immediately upon enactment.

           The Senate amendments  make minor and technical changes to the  
          bill.

           EXISTING LAW  : 

          1)Restricts, under the Political Reform Act, former employees  








                                                                  AB 1584
                                                                  Page  3

            and Board members from being paid to appear before or  
            communicate with their former agency to influence the agency's  
            actions for a period of one year following the end of their  
            employment or term.  The Political Reform Act also prohibits  
            state officials from making, participating in, or influencing  
            government decisions directly relating to a prospective  
            employer with whom they are negotiating employment or after  
            they have reached an employment arrangement.  A knowing or  
            willful violation of these provisions constitutes a  
            misdemeanor, subject to civil liability and administrative  
            fines, up to $5,000 per occurrence.

          2)Prohibits, under the Public Contract Code, a covered former  
            state official from entering into a contract for which he or  
            she engaged in any of the negotiations, transactions,  
            planning, arrangements, or any part of the decision-making  
            process while in state service-for a two-year period after  
            separation.  For a one-year period after separation, a covered  
            former state official may not enter into a contract with the  
            former agency if he or she was in a policy-making position in  
            that agency in the same general subject area as the proposed  
            contract.  Any contract entered in violation of these  
            provisions is void, and a willful violation of these  
            provisions is a misdemeanor.

          3)Prohibits, under a provision of the Government Code, a state  
            officer from having a financial interest in any contract he or  
            she makes in his or her official capacity.  Current law also  
            prohibits a state officer or employee from engaging in any  
            employment, activity, or enterprise which is inconsistent,  
            incompatible, or in conflict with his or her duties as a state  
            officer or employee.

          4)States that as part of chaptered legislation that allowed the  
            CalPERS Board of Administration and the Teachers' Retirement  
            Board to establish the compensation and terms of employment  
            for senior investment personnel and key system executives,  
            individuals serving in these positions for less than five  
            years were also prohibited from influencing the actions of  
            retirement boards or retirement systems on behalf of any  
            person, other than the state, within two years after leaving  
            that position.
          This created a stricter conflict of interest standard for  
            retirement system employees in the designated positions,  
            rather than a one-year statutory prohibition that applies to  








                                                                  AB 1584
                                                                  Page  4

            all other state employees.  This change was intended to  
            address the "revolving door" issue - when CalPERS and CalSTRS  
            hire high-level executives or investment managers who may use  
            their new positions to find other opportunities in the private  
            sector.

          5)Prohibits, under AB 246 (Torrico), Chapter 315, Statutes of  
            2007, a member of the board of retirement of a county  
            operating a retirement system under the County Employees'  
            Retirement Law of 1937 ('37 Act) from selling investment  
            products that would be considered an asset for the fund to  
            their own, or any other, '37 Act retirement system.

           AS PASSED BY THE ASSEMBLY,  this bill was substantially similar  
          to the version approved by the Senate.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Senate Appropriations  
          Committee, pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8, negligible state costs.

           COMMENTS  :  Recently, federal and state investigators have  
          alleged that certain placement agents may have paid bribes or  
          kickbacks in "pay-to-play" arrangements to help their investment  
          firm clients obtain capital commitments from public pension  
          funds.

          Placement agents are persons that are hired in connection with  
          an investment transaction as a finder, solicitor, marketer,  
          consultant, broker or other intermediary to raise money or  
          investments from, or to obtain access to, an investor such as  
          public pension fund.

          According to the author, "This proposal is intended to ensure  
          that public pension board members, employees and consultants  
          conduct business to the highest ethical standard, comply with  
          all fiduciary responsibilities and actively work to eliminate  
          actual or perceived conflicts of interest."

          According to one of the bill's sponsors, the California State  
          Controller, "This bill would shed sunlight into the role played  
          by placement agents in state investment decisions and prohibit  
          activities that may expose CalPERS, CalSTRS, and local  
          retirement systems to undue influence by those agents.

          "With the recent scandal involving placement agents and the New  
          York Pension Fund, it is important to ensure that such activity  








                                                                  AB 1584
                                                                  Page  5

          cannot happen in California.  The public also needs to be  
          assured that California's public pension funds operate under the  
          highest ethical standards.  By strengthening current revolving  
          door laws and requiring full transparency of any dealings with  
          placement agents, this bill provides that public assurance."


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Karon Green / P.E., R. & S.S. / (916)  
          319-3957 


                                                                FN: 0002735