BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                  AB 1601|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AB 1601
          Author:   Hill (D), et al
          Amended:  8/17/10 in Senate
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE  :  7-0, 6/29/10
          AYES:  Leno, Cogdill, Cedillo, Hancock, Huff, Steinberg,  
            Wright
           
          SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  11-0, 8/12/10
          AYES:  Kehoe, Ashburn, Alquist, Corbett, Emmerson, Leno,  
            Price, Walters, Wolk, Wyland, Yee
           
          ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  74-0, 06/02/10 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Vehicles:  driving under the influence:  repeat  
          offenders

           SOURCE  :     Author


           DIGEST  :    This bill, operative on January 1, 2012,  
          authorizes the court to revoke a persons license for 10  
          years after a third or subsequent DUI [driving under the  
          influence] conviction and to delay a license suspension or  
          revocation until a person is no longer incarcerated.

           ANALYSIS  :    Existing law provides it is unlawful for any  
          person who is under the influence of any alcoholic beverage  
          or drug, or under the combined influence of any alcoholic  
          beverage and drug, to drive a vehicle.  (Section 23152(a)  
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               AB 1601
                                                                Page  
          2

          of the Vehicle Code [VEH])

          Existing law provides that it is unlawful for any person,  
          while having 0.08 percent or more, by weight, of alcohol in  
          his/her blood to drive a vehicle.  (VEH Section 23152(b))

          Existing law provides that a person who is convicted of a  
          first DUI is subject to the following penalties when given  
          probation:

           Possible 48 hours to six months in jail.

           $390 to $1,000 fine plus 250 percent penalty assessments.

           Completion of a three-month treatment program or a  
            nine-month program if the blood alcohol content (BAC) was  
            .20 percent or more.

           Six-month license suspension or 10-month suspension if  
            nine-month program is ordered. 

           Restricted license may be sought upon proof of enrollment  
            or completion of program, proof of financial  
            responsibility and payment of fees.  However, the court  
            may disallow the restricted license.  

           As of July 1, 2010, in the counties of Alameda, Los  
            Angeles, Sacramento, and Tulare installation of an  
            ignition interlock device for five months is required.   
            (VEH Sections 13352 (a)(1), 13352.1, 13352.4,  
            23538(a)(3), and 23700)
           
          Existing law provides that a person who is convicted of a  
          first DUI with injury is subject to the following  
          penalties:

           16 months, two or three years in state prison, or 90 days  
            to one year in county jail.

           $390 to $1,000 fine plus 250 percent penalty assessments.  


           One year driver's license suspension.


                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               AB 1601
                                                                Page  
          3

          Or, when probation is given:

           Five days to one year in jail.

           $390 to $1,000 fine plus 250 percent penalty assessments.

           One-year license suspension.

           Three-month treatment program or a nine-month program if  
            the BAC was .20 percent or more. 

           Additional penalties that apply to a first DUI without  
            injury.  (VEH Section 23554)

          Existing law provides that if a first-offender DUI is found  
          to have a blood concentration of .15 percent BAC or above  
          or who refused to take a chemical test, the court shall  
          refer the offender to participate in a nine-month licensed  
          program.  (VEH Section 23538 (b)(2))

          Existing law provides that a first-time DUI offender  
          sentenced to a nine-month program because of a high BAC or  
          a refusal shall have their license suspended for 10 months.  
           The law further provides that their license may not be  
          reinstated until the person gives proof of insurance and  
          proof of completion of the required program.  (VEH Section  
          13352.1)

          Existing law provides that a person convicted of a  
          first-time DUI may apply for a restricted license for  
          driving to and from work and to and from a  
          driver-under-the-influence program if specified  
          requirements are met, paying all applicable fees,  
          submitting proof of insurance and proof of participation in  
          a program.  (VEH Section 13352.4)

          Existing law provides that a person who is convicted of a  
          second DUI within seven years shall be punished by  
          imprisonment in the county jail for 90 days to one year  
          and/or a fine of $390 to $1,000.  If the person is granted  
          probation, then he/she is subject to the following: 

           96 hours to one year in county jail.


                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               AB 1601
                                                                Page  
          4

           $390 to $1,000 fine plus 190 percent penalty assessments.

           Restricted license for driving to and from work and  
            treatment program.

           18- or 30-month treatment program.  

           As of July 1, 2010, if convicted in the counties of  
            Alameda, Los Angeles, Sacramento, and Tulare a person  
            shall install an ignition interlock device for a period  
            of 12 months.  (VEH Sections 23540, 23542, and 23700)

          Existing law provides that additional penalties also apply  
          to a person convicted of a second DUI within seven years  
          including:

           Restitution fine of $100-$1,000.  (Section 1202.4 of the  
            Penal Code [PEN])

           Mandatory impound of the vehicle for up to 30 days if the  
            offense occurred within five years of a prior DUI unless  
            "interest of justice" exception is found (defendant must  
            be registered owner of vehicle used in the offense).   
            (VEH Section 23594)

           The court may order installation of an ignition interlock  
            device as a condition of probation. (VEH Section  
            23575(1))

           If the person refuses to take a blood-alcohol test,  
            he/she is subject to 96 hours in county jail whether or  
            not probation is imposed.  (VEH Section 23577)

          Existing law provides that, as of July 1, 2010, the  
          Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) shall advise the person  
          convicted of a second DUI, who was not convicted in the  
          counties of Alameda, Los Angeles, Sacramento and Tulare,  
          that after completion of 90 days of the suspension period,  
          the person may apply for a restricted license subject to  
          the following conditions are met:

           Proof of enrollment in an 18-month or 30-month DUI  
            program.
           The person agrees to continued satisfactory participation  

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               AB 1601
                                                                Page  
          5

            in the program.
           The person submits proof of installation of an ignition  
            interlock device.
           The person provides proof of insurance.
           The person pays all fees.  (VEH Section 13352 (a)(3))

          Existing law provides that a person who is convicted of a  
          third DUI within seven years shall be punished by  
          imprisonment in the county jail for 120 days to one year  
          and/or a fine of $390 to $1,000.  (VEH Section 23546)  If  
          the person is granted probation, he/she is subject to the  
          following penalties: 

           120 days to one year in county jail.  (VEH Section 23548)

           $390 to $1,000 fine plus 190 percent penalty assessments.  
             (VEH Section 23548)

           Three-year revocation of driver's license.  (VEH Section  
            13352(a)(5))

           18- or 30-month treatment program.  (VEH Section 23548)

           As of July 1, 2010, if convicted in the counties of  
            Alameda, Los Angeles, Sacramento and Tulare a person  
            shall install an ignition interlock device for a period  
            of 24 months.  (VEH Section 23700)

          Existing law provides that additional penalties also apply  
          to a person convicted of a third DUI within seven years  
          including:

           Restitution fine of $100-$1,000.  (PEN Section 1202.4)

           The court must impound the vehicle for up to 90 days if  
            the offense occurred within two years of a prior DUI  
            unless "interest of justice" exception is found  
            (defendant must be registered owner of vehicle used in  
            the offense).  (VEH Section 23594)

           The court may order forfeiture of vehicle (defendant must  
            be registered owner of vehicle used in the offense.  (VEH  
            Section 23596)


                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               AB 1601
                                                                Page  
          6

           The court may order installation of an ignition interlock  
            device as a condition of probation. (VEH Section  
            23575(1))

           The Court must designate defendant as a habitual traffic  
            offender for three years.  (VEH Sections 13350(b) and  
            14601.3(e)(3))

           If the person refuses to take a blood-alcohol test,  
            he/she is subject to 10 days in county jail whether or  
            not probation is imposed.  (VEH Section 23577)

          Existing law provides that, as of July 1, 2010, DMV shall  
          advise the person convicted of a third DUI, who was not  
          convicted in the counties of Alameda, Los Angeles,  
          Sacramento and Tulare, that after completion of six months  
          of the suspension period, the person may apply for a  
          restricted license subject to the following conditions are  
          met:

           Proof of enrollment in an 18-month or 30-month DUI  
            program.
           The person agrees to continued satisfactory participation  
            in the program.
           The person submits proof of installation of an ignition  
            interlock device.
           The person provides proof of insurance.
           The person pays all fees.  (VEH Section 13352 (a)(5))

          Existing law provides that a person who is convicted of a  
          fourth or subsequent DUI within seven years shall be  
          punished by imprisonment in the state prison, or in a  
          county jail for not less than 180 days and/or a fine of  
          $350 to $1,000.  (VEH Section 23550)  A person who is  
          granted probation is subject to the following penalties: 

           16 months, or two or three years in state prison if not  
            probation; 180 days to one year if probation.  (PEN  
            Section 18; VEH Sections 23550 and 23552)

           $390 to $1,000 fine plus 190 percent penalty assessments.  
             (VEH Section 23552)

           Four-year revocation of driver's license.  (VEH Section  

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               AB 1601
                                                                Page  
          7

            13352(a)(7))

           18- or 30-month treatment program.  (VEH Section 23552)

           As of July 1, 2010, if convicted in the counties of  
            Alameda, Los Angeles, Sacramento, and Tulare, a person  
            shall install an ignition interlock device for a period  
            of 36 months.  (VEH Section 23700)

          Existing law provides that additional penalties also apply  
          to a person convicted of a fourth DUI within seven years  
          including:

           Restitution fine of $100 to $1,000 for a misdemeanor or  
            $200 to $10,000 for a felony.  (PEN Section 1202.4)

           The court must impound the vehicle for up to 90 days if  
            the offense occurred within two years of a prior DUI  
            unless "interest of justice" exception is found  
            (defendant must be registered owner of vehicle used in  
            the offense.  (VEH Section 23594.)

           The court may order forfeiture of vehicle (defendant must  
            be registered owner of vehicle used in the offense.  (VEH  
            Section 23596)

           The court may order installation of an ignition interlock  
            device as a condition of probation.  (VEH Sections  
            23575(1) and 13325(a)(7))

           The court must designate defendant as a habitual traffic  
            offender for three years.  (VEH Sections 13350(b) and  
            14601.3(e)(3))

           If the person refuses to take a blood-alcohol test,  
            he/she is subject to 18 days in county jail whether or  
            not probation is imposed.  (VEH Section 23577)

          Existing law provides that if a person who is convicted of  
          a DUI, who has had a prior felony DUI or felony vehicular  
          manslaughter (PEN Section 192(c)(1)) within 10 years or  
          ever has been convicted of vehicular manslaughter while  
          intoxicated, gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated  
          or vehicular manslaughter punished as a felony (PEN Section  

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               AB 1601
                                                                Page  
          8

          192(c)(3)) shall be punished as a felony punishable by 16  
          months, two or three years or a misdemeanor of up to one  
          year in jail, a fine of $390-$1,000 and a four- or  
          five-year license revocation.  A person granted probation  
          is subject to the following penalties:

           Up to three years in state prison, or

           Up to one year in jail.

           A fine up to $1,000 plus penalty assessments.

           Completion of a treatment program in order to have  
            license reinstated.

           Four-year license revocation or a five-year revocation if  
            it is a third or subsequent DUI.  (VEH Sections 23550.5  
            and 23600)

          Existing law provides that gross vehicular manslaughter  
          while intoxicated is the unlawful killing of a human being  
          without malice aforethought in the driving of a vehicle  
          where the driving was in violation of DUI laws, and the  
          killing was either the proximate result of the commission  
          of an unlawful act, not amounting to a felony, and with  
          gross negligence, or the proximate result of the commission  
          of a lawful act that might produce death, in an unlawful  
          manner and with gross negligence.  It is punishable by  
          imprisonment in state prison for four, six or 10 years or  
          if the person has a prior DUI, gross vehicular manslaughter  
          while intoxicated, or vehicular manslaughter the punishment  
          is 15 years to life in state prison.  (PEN Section  
          191.5(a), (c)(1) and (d))

          Existing law provides that vehicular manslaughter while  
          intoxicated is the unlawful killing of a human being  
          without malice aforethought in the driving of a vehicle  
          where the driving was in violation of DUI laws, and the  
          killing was either the proximate result of the commission  
          of an unlawful act, not amounting to felony, but without  
          gross negligence, or the proximate result of the commission  
          of a lawful act that might produce death, in unlawful  
          manner, but without gross negligence.  It is punishable as  
          a wobbler with a penalty of up to one year in jail or  

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               AB 1601
                                                                Page  
          9

          imprisonment the state prison for 16 months, two or three  
          years.  (PEN Section 191.5)

          This bill provides that a court may order a 10-year  
          revocation of the driver's license of a person who has  
          three or more prior DUI convictions.

          This bill provides that the court shall consider all of the  
          following when ordering the 10-year revocation:

           The person's level of remorse for the acts.

           The period of time that has elapsed since the person's  
            previous convictions.

           The person's blood-alcohol level at the time of the  
            violation.

           The person's participation an alcohol treatment program.

           The person's risk to traffic or public safety.

           The person's ability to install a certified ignition  
            interlock device in each motor vehicle she owns or  
            operates.

          This bill provides that upon receipt of a duly certified  
          abstract of record showing the court has ordered a 10-year  
          revocation of a driver's license DMV shall revoke the  
          person's driver's license for 10 years.

          This bill provides that five years from the date of the  
          last conviction of a DUI, a person whose license was  
          revoked may apply to DMV to have his/her driving privilege  
          reinstated provided that the person agrees to have an  
          ignition interlock installed for two years following the  
          reinstatement. 

          This bill provides that DMV shall reinstate the driver's  
          license if the person satisfies all of the following  
          conditions:

           The person was not convicted of any drug-or  
            alcohol-related offenses, under state law, during the  

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               AB 1601
                                                                Page  
          10

            driver's license revocation period.

           The person successfully completed a licensed  
            driving-under-the influence program.

           The person was not convicted of driving on a suspended  
            license during the revocation period.

          This bill provides that when a person is sentenced to jail  
          or prison for a DUI, the court shall postpone the term of  
          the license suspension or revocation until his/her release  
          from prison and shall notify the DMV of the postponement.

          This bill requires DMV to immediately terminate the  
          restriction issued pursuant to this section and shall  
          immediately revoke the privilege to operate a motor vehicle  
          of a person who attempts to remove, bypass, or tamper with  
          the device, who has the device removed prior to the  
          termination date of the restriction, or who fails three or  
          more times to comply with any requirement for the  
          maintenance or calibration of the ignition interlock  
          device.  The privilege shall remain revoked for the  
          remaining period of the original revocation and until all  
          reinstatement requirements are met.

          This bill's provisions become operative on January 1, 2012.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  No

          According to the Senate Appropriations Committee:

                          Fiscal Impact (in thousands)

           Major Provisions            2010-11      2011-12         
           2012-13   Fund  

          DMV revocation            $200       $268          Special*
          procedure

          * Motor Vehicle Account

          This bill authorizes the court to revoke driver's license  
          of a person who has three or more prior DUI convictions,  

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               AB 1601
                                                                Page  
          11

          and requires specific court considerations in the decision.  
           There is no additional cost to granting the court the  
          authority to impose a 10-year revocation.  The costs of  
          this bill are incurred by the implementation of enforcing a  
          court-ordered revocation, as specified by this bill. 

          DMV will incur $468,000 in upfront costs to update its  
          computer system to be able to implement the 10-year  
          revocation, to delay the suspension period for every  
          second-or-subsequent offense drunk driver who spends any  
          time in jail, as required by this bill.  DMV has also  
          expressed concern that the department will not be able to  
          update its computer system by January 1, 2011, when this  
          bill goes into effect, and will have to devise a  
          work-around process, in consultation with the courts, to  
          implement this bill absent a computerized process until it  
          can be updated (likely by January 2012). 

          Until that time, both the court and DMV will likely  
          experience a significant workload increase to set up a  
          procedure and implement it manually.  The courts would  
          likely have to submit hard-copy abstracts of conviction,  
          and then manually calculate and input any delay period,  
          based upon the length of sentence.  Additionally, DMV will  
          have to establish a procedure for allowing suspended  
          drivers to show evidence that they were released early,  
          which is common, and manually recalculate the date of  
          eligibility for reinstatement.

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  8/17/10)

          California Association of Highway Patrolmen
          California District Attorneys Association
          California Peace Officers' Association
          California State Sheriffs' Association
          Crime Victims United
          Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office
          Peace Officers Research Association of California
          The Century Council


           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    According to the author:

            A series of news articles in November about a Burlingame  

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               AB 1601
                                                                Page  
          12

            man who had eight DUIs and was able to get his license  
            back only to get his ninth DUI highlighted several  
            problems with California law.  

            According to 2008 data from the National Highway Traffic  
            Safety Administration there are over 310,000 Californians  
            with three or more DUI convictions.
             
            Repeat DUI offenders are endangering constituents  
            throughout California.  In 2008, over 1,000 people were  
            killed by drunk drivers in California and another 28,000  
            were injured.  
             
            The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration  
            estimates that one-third of the annual 1.5 million DUI  
            arrests are repeat offenders.  
             
            Assembly Bill 1601 would authorize judges to revoke a  
            license for ten years for individuals who receive three  
            or more DUIs in a ten-year period.
             
            "This legislation will save lives by keeping dangerous  
            repeat DUI offenders off the road," said Assemblymember  
            Hill.  "If this bill were in affect in 2008 we could have  
            taken over 10,000 repeat DUI offenders off our roadways  
            including the two individuals in San Mateo County who  
            have nine DUIs."
             
            In 2008 there were 187,987 DUI convictions according to  
            the Department of Motor Vehicles.  Of those 9,164 were  
            three-time DUI offenders within ten years and 3,200 were  
            for individuals who received four-or-more DUI convictions  
            within the previous ten-years. 
             
            Under current law, people with 3 DUI convictions within  
            ten years typically get a 3-year license revocation.  The  
            maximum penalty under current law is a 5-year license  
                                                                             revocation for individuals who receive several DUIs  
            within a ten-year period.
             
            "AB 1601 targets habitual repeat DUI offenders who  
            continue to break the law despite drug treatment  
            programs, fines, imprisonment, and existing license  
            revocation penalties," said Hill. 

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               AB 1601
                                                                Page  
          13

             
            The bill also adds an important clarification to state  
            law by requiring the license revocation period to begin  
            after the offender is released from imprisonment.   
            Current law allows the license revocation period to run  
            concurrently with the prison term which allows the repeat  
            DUI offender to get their license back quicker after  
            they're released from prison.


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :
          AYES:  Adams, Ammiano, Anderson, Arambula, Bass, Beall,  
            Bill Berryhill, Blakeslee, Block, Blumenfield, Bradford,  
            Brownley, Buchanan, Caballero, Charles Calderon, Carter,  
            Chesbro, Conway, Cook, Coto, Davis, De La Torre, De Leon,  
            DeVore, Emmerson, Eng, Evans, Feuer, Fletcher, Fong,  
            Fuentes, Fuller, Furutani, Gaines, Galgiani, Garrick,  
            Gilmore, Hagman, Hall, Harkey, Hayashi, Hernandez, Hill,  
            Huber, Huffman, Jeffries, Jones, Knight, Logue, Bonnie  
            Lowenthal, Ma, Mendoza, Monning, Nava, Nestande, Niello,  
            Nielsen, V. Manuel Perez, Portantino, Ruskin, Salas,  
            Saldana, Silva, Skinner, Smyth, Solorio, Swanson,  
            Torlakson, Torres, Torrico, Tran, Villines, Yamada, John  
            A. Perez
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Tom Berryhill, Lieu, Miller, Norby,  
            Audra Strickland, Vacancy


          RJG:mw  8/17/10   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****












                                                           CONTINUED