BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 1639
                                                                  Page  1


          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
          AB 1639 (Nava, Bass and Lieu)
          As Amended May 28, 2010
          Majority vote 

           JUDICIARY           7-3         BANKING & FINANCE   7-5         
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Feuer, Brownley, Evans,   |Ayes:|Eng, Monning, Fong,       |
          |     |Torlakson, Lieu, Monning, |     |Mendoza, Nava, Ruskin,    |
          |     |Nava                      |     |Lieu                      |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |Nays:|Tran, Hagman, Knight      |Nays:|Niello, Gaines, Fuentes,  |
          |     |                          |     |Harkey, Tran              |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           APPROPRIATIONS      12-5                                        
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Fuentes, Ammiano,         |     |                          |
          |     |Bradford,                 |     |                          |
          |     |Charles Calderon, Coto,   |     |                          |
          |     |Davis,                    |     |                          |
          |     |Monning, Ruskin, Skinner, |     |                          |
          |     |Solorio,                  |     |                          |
          |     |Torlakson, Torrico        |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |Nays:|Conway, Harkey, Miller,   |     |                          |
          |     |Nielsen, Norby            |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY  :  Establishes a facilitated Mortgage Workout Program  
          (MWP) for borrowers facing foreclosure whereby a borrower could  
          request to participate in conciliation sessions with their  
          lender to examine mortgage loan modification options or  
          foreclosure alternatives.  Specifically,  this bill  :  

          1)Provides that a mortgagee, trustee, beneficiary, or authorized  
            agent shall inform a borrower via certified mail accompanying  
            a notice of delinquency and notice of default that the  
            borrower may request to participate in the MWP.  The notice  
            shall include the telephone number, email address, and  
            Internet Web site for the administrator.








                                                                  AB 1639
                                                                  Page  2



          2)Provides that the provisions of the MWP apply to primary  
            residences only.

          3)Provides that eligibility for the MWP is limited to loans that  
            originated prior to January 1, 2009, and for which the unpaid  
            principal balance of the mortgage is no more than $729,750.00.

          4)Provides that there is no obligation to offer the MWP if the  
            mortgagee, trustee, beneficiary, or authorized agent has  
            either written evidence documenting a personal face-to-face  
            meeting with the borrower for the purpose of discussing loan  
            modification or foreclosure avoidance options; or written  
            evidence documenting that the borrower has been offered a loan  
            modification that would establish a ratio of the borrower's  
            housing-related debt to the borrower's gross income, as  
            specified, or if the borrower has filed a petition for  
            bankruptcy, and the proceedings have not been finalized.

          5)Allows a borrower 30 days from the receipt of the delinquency  
            notice to request participation in the MWP.

          6)Provides that if a borrower chooses to participate in the  
            program prior to the filing of a notice of default (NOD) then  
            the mortgagee, trustee, beneficiary, or authorized agent is  
            not required to exercise other due diligence contact  
            requirements as currently mandated under the law.

          7)Provides that if a borrower elects to participate in the MWP  
            s/he must complete an election form either via Internet Web  
            site, email, telephone, or via mail service.

          8)Provides that the program administrator shall implement rules  
            and standards for the MWP, as specified and collect all  
            require fees.

          9)Requires within 10 days of requesting to participate in the  
            MWP, the borrower shall submit specified documents to the  
            program administrator.

          10)Requires that within 10 days of receiving notice that the  
            borrower has elected to participate in the MWP, the mortgagee,  
            trustee, beneficiary, or authorized agent shall likewise  
            submit specified documents to the program administrator.








                                                                  AB 1639
                                                                  Page  3



          11)Provides that the foreclosure process is suspended during the  
            time the borrower is participating in the program.

          12)Provides that the mortgagee, trustee, beneficiary or  
            authorized agent shall deposit an administrative fee of $500  
            and a deposit of mediator's fees of $600, as well as, all  
            required documentation within 10 days of notification from the  
            administrator of the borrower's request to participate in the  
            program.

          13)Prohibits continuances of the MWP session(s) unless certain  
            conditions are met.

          14)Specifies that the borrower and mortgagee, trustee,  
            beneficiary, or authorized agent may, but are not required to,  
            agree on the terms of a loan modification.

          15)Provides that nothing shall be construed to prevent a  
            creditor from offering or accepting alternatives in writing to  
            foreclosure, such as a short sale or deed-in-lieu of  
            foreclosure, but only if the borrower requests these  
            alternatives, rejects a loan modification offered pursuant to  
            this section, or does not qualify for a loan modification  
            pursuant to this section.

          16)Specifies that if a borrower fails to meaningfully  
            participate in the MWP, the program shall be suspended, unless  
            the borrower cures noncompliance within 10 days.

          17)Specifies that the mortgagee, trustee, beneficiary or  
            authorized agent fails to meaningfully participate,  
            foreclosure actions shall be suspended until such time that  
            the mortgagee, trustee, beneficiary or authorized agent cures  
            noncompliance.

          18)Requires the administrator to report quarterly to the  
            Legislature regarding the performance of the MWP.

          19)Each mortgagee, trustee, beneficiary, or authorized agent  
            participating in the MWP shall post public data reports on a  
            quarterly basis on its Internet Web site

          20)Requires that a conciliation officer shall use all reasonable  








                                                                  AB 1639
                                                                  Page  4


            efforts to ensure that each MWP session is completed within 60  
            calendar days of the appointment.

          21)Requires the conciliation officer to issue a report to the  
            Administrator upon completion of the conciliation that shall  
            state whether the parties reached a mutually acceptable  
            resolution.

          22)Provides that the obligations of borrowers, mortgagees,  
            trustees, beneficiaries and authorized agents under this act  
            shall become operative only upon issuance of a notice to the  
            Governor by the Administrator declaring that the rules,  
            standards, forms, training, lists, collection and payment  
            provisions required by 2946.2 have been completed such that  
            the Administrator has the capacity to make the program  
            available to any borrower wishing to participate in every  
            county of the state.  

          23)Provides that operation of the bill is contingent upon  
            receipt of federal funding.

          24)Provides that the bill shall sunset on January 1, 2014.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee, minor state costs, as implementation is contingent on  
          federal funds and ongoing costs of mediation is covered by fees  
          paid by participants.  Key fiscal impacts include:

          1)Annual costs for newly appointed administrator, associated  
            staff, and overhead to administer the MWP, ranging up to $1  
            million (Federal Funds). 

          2)Annual costs to the Department of Corporations and the  
            Department of Financial Institutions of about $80,000 to  
            respond to borrower inquiries and complaints, to develop a  
            protocol for examining licensees for compliance with the new  
            requirements, and add the new protocol into routine  
            examinations (special funds). 

          3)Potential state-reimbursable mandated costs to local  
            governments, probably minor, related to recording of  
            additional information with notices of default.
           
          COMMENTS :  The joint authors carry this bill, sponsored by Los  








                                                                  AB 1639
                                                                  Page  5


          Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, to provide an important  
          opportunity for residential mortgage borrowers to engage in  
          discussions with their lender or loan servicer in an effort to  
          come to work out a mutually acceptable agreement to modify the  
          terms of the loan prior to foreclosure.

          The authors explain the reason for the bill as follows:

               Thus far, the solutions offered to address foreclosure have  
               been a gamut of voluntary programs that still place  
               borrowers at the distinct disadvantage of having to trust  
               that their lenders can process their request for help in a  
               timely manner to help them avoid foreclosure.

               Voluntary approaches that rely on the beneficent decisions  
               of lenders are no longer acceptable.  All of the programs  
               that exist today fail to create an atmosphere of  
               accountability, trust and transparency in the loan  
               modification process.  

               The Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP), is the  
               cornerstone of the Federal response to the foreclosure  
               crisis.  Thus far, the numbers are less than successful.   
               The HAMP program was designed to assist 3-4 million  
               homeowners.  Almost eighteen months after implementation,  
               1.3 million temporary modifications offers have been  
               extended with only 170,000 made permanent.  While 1.3  
               million temporary offers seem significant, it is unclear  
               how many of those were accepted or whether they were on  
               terms the borrower could afford.  Anecdotal examples show  
               that many temporary offers do little more than create  
               balloon payments of outstanding principle and interest, or  
               in some cases actually                                       
               increase the monthly mortgage amount due to the mandatory  
               creation of escrow accounts for taxes and insurance.

               A solution that holds promise is foreclosure mediation that  
               requires lenders and borrowers to meet face to face with a  
               neutral third party to work out a loan modification, or to  
               determine if a modification is not appropriate and work out  
               an exit from the home that is best for all parties.   
               Foreclosure mediation is working in other jurisdictions  
               outside of California.  The City of Philadelphia has had  
               success in saving homes using this model and last year,  








                                                                  AB 1639
                                                                  Page  6


               Nevada started a statewide mediation program.
                          
               Under AB 1639, a borrower who is delinquent on their  
               mortgage or receives a notice of default can elect to  
               participate in a foreclosure mediation program with their  
               lender so they can arrive at a sustainable loan  
               modification.  If the borrower is not able to receive a  
               modification it would allow the borrower and lender to work  
               out a reasonable transition plan.  This program will ensure  
               that homeowners who have a chance to stay in their homes  
               get that opportunity.  Mediation is not a one-sided concept  
               - lenders and servicers have every incentive to participate  
               because a mediation session will demonstrate if a borrower  
               qualifies for a modification program.  Furthermore,  
               mediation is also a fair system to address foreclosure  
               because in CA, the mediator can not compel a specific  
               result.
           

          Analysis Prepared by  :    Kevin G. Baker / JUD. / (916) 319-2334 


                                                                FN: 0004713