BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 1645
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   April 15, 2010

                            ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON BUDGET
                               Bob Blumenfield, Chair
                   AB 1645 (Nestande) - As Amended:  April 15, 2010
           
          SUBJECT  :   State Budget: Key Liabilities

           SUMMARY  :   Requires the Governor to submit to the Legislature,  
          along with the annual budget proposal, a report identifying key  
          liabilities and how to retire those liabilities.  Additionally,  
          the bill restricts the Governor from including revenue from laws  
          or programs not yet authorized or in effect in the annual budget  
          revenue estimates.  Specifically,  this bill  : 

          1)Requires the Governor to submit, with the annual budget  
            proposal, a report identifying the state's key liabilities  
            that will affect the state's financial health in the future.   
            The report is required to discuss budget-related liabilities,  
            infrastructure-related liabilities, and retirement-related  
            liabilities.  The report must also include recommendations for  
            the retirement of those liabilities.

          2)Requires the Governor's budget to include a section that  
            specifies the percentages and amounts of General Fund (GF)  
            revenues that must be set aside and applied toward retiring  
            those key liabilities identified in the report required by  
            this bill.

          3)Restricts the Governor's budget from including in its revenue  
            estimates any revenue expected to be generated from laws,  
            programs, or executive actions not in effect or effectuated at  
            the time the budget is submitted to the Legislature.

           EXISTING LAW  :

          1)Requires the Governor to submit, within the first 10 days of  
            each calendar year, a budget for the ensuing fiscal year  
            (Article IV, section 12 of the California Constitution).

          2)Requires the Governor's budget to include a complete plan and  
            itemized statement of all proposed expenditures and all  
            estimated revenues for the ensuing fiscal year.  It must also  
            contain a comparison for those proposed "budget year"  
            expenditures and revenues with the actual revenue and  








                                                                  AB 1645
                                                                  Page  2

            expenditure amounts for the previous completed fiscal year and  
            the estimated revenue and expenditures for the current year.

          3)Requires the budget to include a section that specifies the  
            percentage and amount of GF revenue that must be set aside for  
            schools and community colleges pursuant to Proposition 98.  

          4)Government Code 16320 requires the Director of Finance on  
            August 1st of each year to report to the Joint Legislative  
            Budget Committee the balance of any internal loans between  
            state funds.  On February first, the Director of Finance is  
            required to update that report, and additionally include a  
            summary of all obligations for future payments of deferred or  
            suspended expenditures.

             a)   Staff notes that this section refers only to loans and  
               obligations related to the 2001-2004 fiscal years, but that  
               the Director of Finance in practice includes all years in  
               the report.  

           FISCAL EFFECT  :   Unknown

           COMMENTS  :  The author states the intent of this bill is to  
          highlight state liabilities.  This bill, however, does not  
          appear to achieve the outcome of focusing the budget discussion  
          on those specific issues.  As discussed below, many of these  
          issues are already addressed within the existing Governor's  
          Budget.  The fact that they are not recognized as being part of  
          the Governor's Budget simply demonstrates that adding another  
          page, another chart, or another table to a nearly 1,500 page  
          document does not provide a context or discussion point for the  
          budget.  The idea of spurring discussion on these important  
          issues is a good one, but the effect of the bill merely  
          duplicates information within the existing Governor's Budget.

          1)Revenue Estimates:

            The bill, as written, precludes the Governor from including  
            revenue from laws, programs, or executive actions not in  
            effect at the time the budget is submitted.  This, however,  
            would mean the programs and laws proposed in the budget, often  
            with the sole purpose of raising revenue, could not be  
            included in the Governor's revenue estimates.  Additionally,  
            the budget often encompasses many other bills that help  
            implement the budget.  The budget would not be able to account  








                                                                  AB 1645
                                                                  Page  3

            for those actions in revenue estimates either.  The  
            Constitution and State Statute require the Governor to present  
            a balanced budget in a manner he sees fit.  This provision  
            would severely limit the Governor's ability to do that, by  
            limiting all revenue estimates to be those in current law.  It  
            doesn't make sense to limit projections to current law.  The  
            Governor's Budget is intended to propose changes, allowing the  
            Legislature to adopt some of those changes, and rejects  
            others.  As changes are made to the proposed budget and other  
            bills before the legislature, the revenue and spending  
            estimates are adjusted accordingly.  The Author and Committee  
            may wish to consider removing this portion of the bill. 
             
          2)Key Liabilities:

            The bill requires the budget to include the amount of GF  
            revenues that must be set aside and applied toward retiring  
            "key liabilities" but doesn't define what that means.   
            Liabilities generally refer to debts, but do not speak to the  
            time frame of that debt.  The budget proposal is only designed  
            to address the ensuing budget year.  Any liabilities, such as  
            debt payments, loan repayments, or retirement contributions,  
            which need to be paid in the budget year, are already included  
            within the budget.  Liabilities that will be paid in future  
            years could confuse the budget document and imply the full  
            liability must be paid in the budget year.  

            Additionally, the bill, as drafted, requires the budget to  
            identify the funding that must be set aside "in accordance  
            with the recommendations contained in the report."  This  
            implies the recommendations made solely by the Governor, to  
            address long term liabilities, somehow compels that the budget  
            include those actions.  In reality, these long term  
            liabilities could be addressed over many years, using funds  
            other than general funds, using very different methods than  
            those recommended independently by the Governor.  The bill  
            requires a separate report, which includes recommendations for  
            the retirement of those liabilities, and is likely a more  
            appropriate place for those discussions to occur.   The Author  
            and Committee may wish to consider removing the requirement  
            for the budget to specify GF set asides to be applied to the  
            key liabilities identified in the separate report.  

          3)Bond/Infrastructure Debt:









                                                                  AB 1645
                                                                  Page  4

            The report proposed by the bill must identify the state's key  
            liabilities, including infrastructure liabilities.  The budget  
            submitted by the Governor currently contains a great deal of  
            information regarding the state's existing bond debt.  On page  
            18 of the Governor's 2010-11 proposed budget summary, both  
            Debt Service and Infrastructure are identified as  
            expenditures.  On page 66 of the same document, there is a  
            discussion as to where the debt service costs come from.  The  
            appendix to the Governor's budget summary includes "Schedule  
            11 - Statement of General Obligation Bond and Commercial Paper  
            Debt of the State of California."  This two page chart lists  
            each active bond act, that amount of authorized funds, how  
            much of that has been issued, how much has been redeemed, and  
            how much remains outstanding.  It may be duplicative to  
            request this information in the report.

          4)Retirement-Related Liabilities:

            Both the Public Employees' Retirement System (PERS) and the  
            State Teachers' Retirement System (STRS) operate, to some  
            extent, independently of the legislature.  They each have the  
            fiduciary responsibility to operate their systems responsibly,  
            thus adequately addressing all unfunded liabilities.  As such,  
            it doesn't make sense for the Governor to provide estimates of  
            costs to pay off those liabilities.  The systems annually  
            address the need to increase payments (or decrease payments)  
            as necessary based on the fund status.  

            The more pressing retirement liability relates to state  
            retiree health benefits.  These benefits are currently funded  
            on a pay-as-you-go basis, as opposed to pre-funded.  These  
            liabilities are reported upon annually by the State  
            Controller's Office.  Some groups have recommended that these  
            benefits become pre-funded, such as the Post-Employment  
            Benefits Commission created by the Governor.  This would  
            present significant costs to the state, but would be paid over  
            a long period of time.  As such, this bill would be tasking  
            the Governor with identifying the preferred method/time period  
            for pre-funding these benefits (which is not required by law),  
            and identify those costs as a current liability on the budget.  
             It may be more appropriate for the Legislature to consider  
            such options and determine the best way to handle those costs  
            in the future, rather than task the Governor with this  
            responsibility.  Information on these liabilities is already  
            available from the State Controller annually  








                                                                  AB 1645
                                                                  Page  5

            (http://www.sco.ca.gov/Press-releases/2010/OPEB_February_2010.p 
            df).  It may be duplicative to request this information in the  
            report.

          5)Loans:

            This bill requires the report to list "other liabilities" that  
            will affect the state's financial health in the future.  As  
            drafted, this section is vague and leaves to the Governor's  
            discretion what items should be included.  Pursuant to  
            Government Code 16320, the Governor is already required to  
            report to the Legislature twice a year on internal borrowing  
            between state funds, as well as other obligations for future  
            payments.  


            Rather than add a few pages to be lost in the Governor's  
            Budget, the Author's idea of a report on these issues may be a  
            better solution.  The report would allow the Administration to  
            consolidate this existing information into one place for easy  
            access and would provide a starting point for discussions on  
            the state's debt service and the need for a long-term view of  
            how to handle those costs.  The timing of the report could be  
            far more beneficial to the budget process than including it in  
            the Governor's budget as well.  Requiring the report to be  
            submitted by February 1st of each year would allow data from  
            the full previous calendar year to be processed and would  
            provide the information during budget discussions, allowing  
            appropriate changes to be incorporated into the final budget  
            proposal.

           Potential Language:
           
          AB 1645 - Strike the entire bill, and insert:

          Section 16321 is added to the Government Code to read:

          (a) On Feb. 1 of each year, the Director of Finance shall submit  
          a report, in writing, to the Chairperson of the Joint  
          Legislative Budget Committee including:

               (1) A summary and list of loans to the General Fund, their  
               balances, and the dates that the loans are due.

               (2) A summary and list of General Fund obligations for  








                                                                  AB 1645
                                                                  Page  6

               future payment of deferred or suspended expenditures or  
               transfers to any special fund or account and the dates  
               those obligations are due.

               (3) A summary and list of the state's key liabilities in  
               the nature of debt, infrastructure, budget, retirement and  
               other liabilities that will affect the state's financial  
               health in the future. 

               (4) Recommendations for potential methods to retire those  
               liabilities listed over time.

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :   

           Support 
           
          American Council of Engineering Companies
          Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association
          California Communities United Institute
          Desert Contractors' Association
          Whitley's Construction Corporation
          TandemWest Glass

           Opposition 
           
          None on file.
           

          Analysis Prepared by  :    Adam Dondro / BUDGET / (916) 319-2099