BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 1665
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   May 5, 2010

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Felipe Fuentes, Chair

                   AB 1665 (Swanson) - As Amended:  March 16, 2010 

          Policy Committee:                              P.E.R. &  
          S.S.Vote:    4-1

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          Yes    Reimbursable:              Yes

           SUMMARY  

          This bill requires public school employers to give the exclusive  
          representative of classified employees prior written notice of  
          their intent to make any changes to matters within the scope of  
          representation.   Specifically, the bill: 

          1)Requires public school employers to give prior written notice  
            of not less than 15 days to the exclusive representative of  
            classified personnel of their intent to make any change to  
            matters within the scope of representation, including, but not  
            limited to, start time.

          2)Requires the public school employer to provide a recognized  
            employee organization with the opportunity to meet and  
            negotiate with them about the change.

           FISCAL EFFECT

           1)The requirement that school employers meet and negotiate with  
            employee representatives regarding planned changes to start  
            time could be a reimbursable state mandated local cost. The  
            magnitude of costs is unknown, but could exceed several  
            hundreds of thousands of dollars statewide.

          2)Unknown, potentially moderate costs to school districts in  
            cases where advanced notice and negotiation requirements  
            result in delays to cost-saving actions, or result in  
            offsetting costs.

           COMMENTS









                                                                 AB 1665
                                                                  Page  2

          1)Background  .  The Educational Employment Relations Act (EERA),  
            gives public school employees the right to form, join, and  
            participate in the activities of employee organizations of  
            their own choosing for the purpose of representation on all  
            matters of employer-employee relations.  The employee  
            organization's scope of representation is limited to matters  
            relating to wages, hours of employment, and other specified  
            terms and conditions of employment. These specified terms  
            include wages and hours of employment, but do not explicitly  
            include start time.

           2)Rationale  . This bill, sponsored by the California School  
            Employees Association (CSEA), is intended to ensure that  
            employees receive advanced notice and can negotiate with  
            districts about changes in hours and other factors affecting  
            working conditions.  CSEA points out, that in cases where  
            school employers have attempted to unilaterally impose work  
            hour changes without notice, the actions have been overturned  
            by the Public Employment Relations Board (PERB). In their  
            view, this bill explicitly codifies requirements that are  
            already in law with regard to collective bargaining. CSEA also  
            asserts that the bill mirrors language found in code sections  
            pertaining to public agency employees, state employees, and  
            trial court employees.

           3)Opponents  (various associations of school administrators and  
            school boards) assert the bill creates costly and unwarranted  
            burdens on school districts coping with budget cuts. They also  
            note that current law protects employees from unnoticed  
            changes affecting matters within the scope of bargaining, and  
            does so in a way that allows for flexibility to adapt to  
            changes in school schedules. They assert that if employee  
            representatives believe that district practices are illegal,  
            they can file an appeal with PERB.     

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Brad Williams / APPR. / (916) 319-2081