BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 1671
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:  April 7, 2010

                       ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT
                                Cameron Smyth, Chair
                   AB 1671 (Jeffries) - As Amended:  March 10, 2010
           
          SUBJECT  :  County board of supervisors: vacancy: appointment.

           SUMMARY  :  Authorizes a quorum of a board of supervisors (board)  
          within 90 days from the date of vacancy to appoint an individual  
          to fill the vacancy, to call a special election, or to vote to  
          have the Governor appoint a person to fill the vacancy.   
          Specifically,  this bill :

          1)Authorizes a quorum of a board within 90 days from the date of  
            vacancy to appoint an individual to fill the vacancy, to call  
            a special election, or to vote to have the Governor appoint a  
            person to fill the vacancy.

          2)Requires the Governor to appoint an individual to fill the  
            vacancy within 30 days after the board's 90-day period to  
            appoint an individual or call a special election has lapsed or  
            within 30 days of the board's authorizing vote to have the  
            Governor fill the vacancy.  

           EXISTING LAW  requires the Governor to fill a vacancy on any  
          county board of supervisors with that appointee holding office  
          until the election and qualification of his or her successor.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  Unknown

           COMMENTS  :

          1)Since laws were first codified in California in 1872, there  
            have been provisions governing how to fill a vacancy on a  
            board.  In 1872, the county judge was designated the  
            appointer.  In 1880, the Legislature tried to change the  
            appointer from the county judge to a superior judge, but that  
            was overturned by the Supreme Court as unconstitutional.  

          Then in 1883, the duty to appoint was moved to the state level  
            and put in the hands of the Governor.  

          In 1887, the law was changed to require the board to hold a  
            special election on the fifth Tuesday after the vacancy  








                                                                  AB 1671
                                                                  Page  2

            occurred to fill the office for the unexpired term unless a  
            general election was to be held 90 days after the vacancy  
            occurred.  The law still authorized the Governor to make the  
            appointment as well.  This language was reaffirmed by the  
            Legislature in 1891 and 1893.

          In 1907, the Legislature tweaked the existing law and returned  
            to giving the Governor the sole authority to fill a vacancy  
            until the election and qualification of a successor.  The  
            election of the supervisor was required to be held at the next  
            general election unless the unexpired term ended on the first  
            Monday after the first day of January succeeding the general  
            election. 



          In 1947, the Legislature moved the county government  
            organization provisions from the Political Code, where they  
            had been since 1872, to the Government Code (Stats. 1947,  
            Chap. 424).  When that happened, the language to fill a  
            vacancy on a board changed yet again to read as it exists  
            today in Section 25060 of the Government Code.  That language  
            simply requires the Governor to fill the vacancy with the  
            appointee holding office until the election and qualification  
            of his or her successor. 

          2)Furthermore, in 1947 when the Legislature reorganized all the  
            provisions pertaining to county governance in the Government  
            Code, it also declared counties to be the largest political  
            division of the state, statutorily codifying what had been in  
            the California Constitution since 1879, the year the original  
            1849 Constitution was scrapped and rewritten.  Section 1(a) of  
            Article XI of the California Constitution declares the state  
            is divided into counties, which are legal subdivisions of the  
            state.  

          The California Supreme Court has had several opportunities  
            throughout the decades to interpret this section of the  
            California Constitution.  In Younger v. Board of Supervisors,  
            (1979) 93 Cal.App.3d 864, 870, the court observed: "Since  
            counties constitute merely political subdivisions of the state  
            [Hicks v. Board of Supervisors, (1977) 69 Cal.App.3d 228, 242;  
            Byers v. Board of Supervisors, (1968) 262 Cal.App.2d 148,  
            155], they have independently only such legislative authority  
            that has been expressly conferred by the Constitution and laws  








                                                                  AB 1671
                                                                  Page  3

            of the state.  If the latter sources are silent in regard to  
            the delegation of such authority, the authority must still  
            rest with the Legislature."  Also, in County of Los Angeles v.  
            County of Orange, (1893) 97 Cal. 329, 330, the California  
            Supreme Court stated: "Counties are merely local subdivisions  
            of the State created by the Legislature for governmental  
            purposes, and are denominated public corporations for the  
            reason that they are but parts of the machinery employed in  
            carrying on political affairs of the State."

          These court decisions lay out the legal principle that as  
            political subdivisions of the state, counties legally answer  
            to the Legislature and are not purely local institutions.  As  
            part of that constitutional authority, the Legislature has  
            decided during the last 138 years to give that authority to  
            fill a vacancy on a board to a third party ranging from the  
            county judge, the superior judge, the governor, to the  
            electorate of the county in question.  The Legislature has  
            never given a local board the legal ability to fill a  
            political seat that is part of the state's direct political  
            structure.

          3)AB 1671 would apply only to general law counties.  Currently,  
            there are 14 charter counties.  Each of these charters  
            designates how a vacancy on its board is to be filled, ranging  
            from calling a special election to appointment by the board  
            within 60 days with the Governor filling the vacancy after  
            that 60 days.  San Francisco's charter calls for the mayor to  
            appoint someone to fill the vacancy with a special election to  
            be called unless a regular election is scheduled to occur less  
            than one year but at least 120 days after the vacancy.

          4)According to the author, over the past few years, many vacant  
            board seats have sat empty upon the current supervisor  
            vacating that seat.  Often times, the Governor, who retains  
            sole power of appointment to fill a vacancy, takes many months  
            to finally appoint a new supervisor.  The author says that,  
            not only does this not serve the constituents of that  
            supervisorial district in any good manner, but it allows a  
            state official, the Governor, to control the affairs of a  
            local elected body.  According to the author, local government  
            should have the power to run local affairs - specifically,  
            appointing someone to fill a vacancy on the board as quickly  
            as possible.  The author says AB 1671 empowers counties by  
            giving sitting supervisors the power to fill a supervisor  








                                                                  AB 1671
                                                                  Page  4

            vacancy in an efficient and quick manner.  AB 1671 will  
            provide boards with many options for them to decide how to  
            fill a vacancy.  The author says boards should have the power  
            to fill their own vacancies and should not have to wait for  
            the Governor to fill a vacancy.

          5)At no point since California first codified its laws in 1872  
            did the Legislature give a board the power to unilaterally  
            fill a vacancy on its own body.  Because counties are both  
            constitutionally and statutorily declared to be legal  
            divisions of the state, having the Governor, who is the head  
            of the state, fill a vacancy on a board flows naturally.  The  
            Committee may wish to consider whether it is appropriate to  
            ignore 138 years of precedent and now give the power to fill a  
            vacancy to the board.  The Committee may wish to consider if  
            it might be more prudent to establish a time limit for the  
            Governor to make a board appointment instead of handing the  
            power solely over to the board.

           6)Support Arguments  :  Supporters of AB 1671 might argue having a  
            board fill its own vacancy supports local control.  Having the  
            Governor appoint someone to a local board when the Governor  
            has no personal knowledge of that particular county or its  
            board promotes special interest lobbying to get a particular  
            person appointed.

           7)Opposition Arguments  :  One might consider whether having a  
            board fill its own vacancy would promote cronyism over  
            qualifications.  Having the Governor, who is a neutral third  
            party, fill the vacancy ensures local officials do not become  
            corrupt in their appointments.  Also, as a political division  
            of the state, the Governor is the legal chain of command to do  
            the appointing.  Furthermore, boards have never been allowed  
            in the history of the state to fill their own vacancies.

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :

           Support
           
          California State Association of Counties
          Regional Council of Rural Counties

           Opposition
           
          None on file








                                                                  AB 1671
                                                                  Page  5

           
          Analysis Prepared by  :    Jennifer R. Klein / L. GOV. / (916)  
          319-3958