BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    




                   Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
                           Senator Christine Kehoe, Chair

                                           1703 (Knight)
          
          Hearing Date:  07/15/2010           Amended: 06/22/2010
          Consultant:  Dan Troy           Policy Vote: ED 6-0
          _________________________________________________________________ 
          ____
          BILL SUMMARY:  AB 1703 would increase the maximum loan  
          assumption payment for registered nurses (RNs) participating in  
          the State Nursing Assumption Program of Loans for Education -  
          Nurses in State Facilities (SNAPLE-NSF) who become employed  
          full-time in a state-operated veterans' home from $20,000 for  
          four-years of service to $40,000.  The bill would also expand  
          the conditions under which a participant may receive a one-year  
          extension for completing the required four years of services to  
          include military service.  
          _________________________________________________________________ 
          ____
                            Fiscal Impact (in thousands)

           Major Provisions         2010-11      2011-12       2012-13     Fund
           
          SNAPLE-NSF             $20 in the first year,  
          ultimatelygrowingGeneral
                                 to $80 annually, assuming 2 new  
          applicants                                    
          _________________________________________________________________ 
          ____

          STAFF COMMENTS: This bill meets the criteria for referral to the  
          Suspense File.
          
          Current law authorizes the State Nursing Assumption Program of  
          Loans for Education for nurses employed in specified state  
          facilities (SNAPLE-NSF) to be administered by the California  
          Student Aid Commission (CSAC).  To be eligible, nurses must be  
          employed for four consecutive years by state-operated 24 hour  
          facilities, such as veterans' homes, prisons, and developmental  
          centers that have a clinical nurse vacancy rate higher than 10  
          percent.  Eligible participants have loan payments of up to  
          $5,000 assumed by the program annually for four years, for a  
          maximum award of $20,000 (assumptions awards may not exceed  
          actual student loan debt).











          This bill would increase the maximum grant for participants  
          employed in veterans' homes from $20,000 to $40,000.  

          Despite authorizations for up to 100 annual awards in recent  
          year, the SNAPLE-NSF program has garnered few applicants (only  
          three in the 2008-09 fiscal year).  A January 2010 report noted  
          that there was only one veterans' home in the state with a 10  
          percent vacancy rate, though two new homes have opened recently.  
           Another veterans' home (in Redding) is under construction.  The  
          intent of the bill is to make employment in these homes more  
          appealing and to attract more applicants for the loan assumption  
          program.

          If this bill leads to two more applicants per year, costs for  
          those awards would total $20,000 in 2011-12, increasing to  
          $80,000 in the 2014-15 fiscal year.  This estimate may be higher  
          or lower depending on the applicants that respond to the bill's  
          incentives.  The provision of the bill that allows participants  
          additional time to complete program 

          Page 2
          AB 1703 (Knight)

          requirements due to military service may result in a minor loss  
          of savings, though this loss will likely be minimal.  

          Staff notes that current law requires the Legislative Analyst's  
          Office (LAO) to provide a report on the efficacy of the program  
          by May 1, 2011.  It may be premature to modify the program prior  
          to the LAO's report.