BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 1733
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   April 13, 2010

              ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON BUSINESS, PROFESSIONS AND CONSUMER  
                                     PROTECTION
                                 Mary Hayashi, Chair
                  AB 1733 (Hill) - As Introduced:  February 4, 2010
           
          SUBJECT  :   Director of California Biotechnology Retention and  
          Recruitment: duties.

           SUMMARY  :   Establishes the Director of California Biotechnology  
          Retention and Recruitment (Director) within the Office of the  
          Governor.  Specifically,  this bill  :  

          1)Establishes the position of Director within the Office of the  
            Governor, to be appointed by, report directly to, and serve at  
            the pleasure of the Governor.

          2)Directs the Director to serve as an informational resource for  
            biotechnology, life science, and medical companies located in  
            California by helping them comply with state and local  
            regulatory requirements and for those interested in relocating  
            to California.  

          3)Makes legislative findings and declarations.

           EXISTING LAW  : 

          1)Requires the California Department of Education (CDE), in  
            consultation with representatives from the California  
            Institute for Regenerative Medicine and the biotechnology  
            industry, to promote stem cell and biotechnology education and  
            workforce development within a variety of existing programs,  
            including the California Health Science Educators Institute,  
            the Health Science Capacity Building Project, the California  
            Partnership Academies, the regional science centers, and the  
            California Career Resource Network.

          2)Requires CDE to post on its Internet Web site information and  
            links to information about biotechnology education programs,  
            including, but not limited to, those identified by the biotech  
            industry and industry-related organizations.

          3)Authorizes various specified state and local entities to enter  
            into memoranda of understanding with the San Diego Multiuse  








                                                                  AB 1733
                                                                  Page  2

            Biotechnology Training Center to provide services, funding,  
            and personnel to accelerate the growth and formation of new  
            bioscience enterprises in the San Diego region.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :   Unknown

           COMMENTS  :   

           Purpose of this bill  .  According to the author's office, this  
          bill would "foster the growth of California's biomedical  
          industry through increased assistance and collaboration between  
          state government, universities and the private sector."

           Background  .  The biomedical industry produces technological  
          innovation that advances human health.  Drugs, medical devices  
          and diagnostics have long played a significant role in the  
          California economy.

          According to the author's office, "California is home to over  
          2,000 biomedical companies employing over 274,000 people.  The  
          average wage for a biomedical industry employee in California is  
          $75,000.  San Mateo County, considered the birthplace of  
          biotechnology, has over 350 companies employing roughly 15,000  
          people with a total payroll of $567 million.  Companies within  
          the state are responsible for 1,200 approved treatments with 869  
          products in the California biopharmaceutical pipeline, including  
          those in pre-clinical and clinical development."

          However, the 2010 Biomedical Industry report released by the  
          California Healthcare Institute (CHI) in February 2010 showed  
          that two-thirds of executives at California's largest biomedical  
          companies expect to move more manufacturing out of state within  
          the next two years.  Fifty-eight percent said they anticipate  
          doing more research and development outside California.   
          Genentech, considered the founder of the biotechnology industry,  
          began constructing its first manufacturing facility outside of  
          California in 2006, citing income tax disparity as the reason  
          for moving out of state.

          Additionally, according to the author's office, "45 states and  
          27 countries are organizing efforts to attract biotechnology  
          companies away from California.  The financial commitments  
          toward life sciences being offered elsewhere are staggering.   
          Ireland will spend $6 billion between 2006 and 2013 on  
          commercialization, research and R&D tax credits.  China spent $1  








                                                                  AB 1733
                                                                  Page  3

          billion last year on biotech investment and attraction.

          "The Director of California Biotechnology Retention and  
          Recruitment, which would be funded with existing resources  
          within the Governor's office, would serve as a one-stop-shop  
          resource for the biomedical industry.  The increased  
          coordination and assistance between state government, higher  
          education, and the private sector resulting from this  
          legislation will translate into high quality jobs for  
          Californians."

          Other states have begun creating offices dedicated to  
          biotechnology retention and recruitment.  The Maryland  
          Biotechnology Center was created in 2009 by Governor Martin  
          O'Malley to consolidate and coordinate a host of state,  
          university and private sector initiatives to better showcase and  
          support biotechnology innovation and entrepreneurship.

           Previous legislation  :

          SB 471 (Romero), Chapter 185, Statutes of 2009, created the  
          California Stem Cell and Biotechnology Education and Workforce  
          Development Act of 2009 to establish stem cell and biotechnology  
          education and workforce development as a state priority and  
          promote stronger links between industry sectors, the California  
          Institute for Regenerative Medicine, and California public  
          schools, as specified.

          AB 1551 (Kehoe), Chapter 628, Statutes of 2003, made legislative  
          declarations relating to the biotechnology industry in the San  
          Diego region and authorizes specified state and local entities  
          to enter into agreements with the San Diego Multiuse  
          Biotechnology Training Center.

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :   

           Support 
           
          Advanced Medical Technology Association (AdvaMed)
          BIOCOM
          California Healthcare Institute (CHI)

           Opposition 
           
          None on file.








                                                                  AB 1733
                                                                  Page  4

           
          Analysis Prepared by  :    Marina Wiant / B.,P. & C.P. / (916)  
          319-3301