BILL ANALYSIS
AB 1760
Page 1
Date of Hearing: April 28, 2010
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Felipe Fuentes, Chair
AB 1760 (Blumenfield) - As Amended: April 19, 2010
Policy Committee:
TransportationVote:10-0
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
No Reimbursable:
SUMMARY
This bill:
1)Reenacts, until January 1, 2016, Caltrans' authorization to
enter into design-sequencing contracts.
2)Requires Caltrans, when using design-sequencing contracting,
to incorporate information on such projects into its annual
contracts status report.
FISCAL EFFECT
1)Minor absorbable costs for Caltrans to incorporate
design-sequencing contract information into its annual
contracts report.
2)Potential significant cost savings from expediting project
completion using design-sequencing.
COMMENTS
1)Background . This bill reenacts design-sequencing authority
for Caltrans that expired on January 1, 2010. Under the
traditional design-bid-build contracting, construction of any
portion of the project cannot commence until Caltrans has
developed complete plans and specifications for the project,
placed the contract out for bid, and awarded the contract.
Design-sequencing is intended to expedite a project by
allowing construction on one phase of the project to be
started while subsequent phases are still under design.
AB 1760
Page 2
Design-sequencing was first authorized by AB 405
(Knox)/Chapter 378 of 1999, which allowed Caltrans to use this
method on a pilot basis for up to six projects. AB 2607
(Knox)/Chapter 340 of 2000 increased the pilot program limit
to 12 projects. Of the 12 design-sequencing projects
authorized in this initial pilot, Caltrans initiated 10
projects before the end of this phase.
SB 1210 (Torlakson)/Chapter 795 of 2004, established a second
phase of the pilot program and authorized an additional 12
design-sequencing projects between January 2005 and January
2010. Of those, Caltrans initiated 11 projects. Last year, AB
732 (Jeffries) which would have extended the second phase
until January 1, 2012, was held on Suspense in Senate
Appropriations.
2)Purpose . In a March 2008 interim report on the pilot program,
Caltrans compared six of the initial design-sequencing
projects against nine control projects. Results for these
initial projects were mixed. However, according to Caltrans
staff, findings from some of the recent projects are more
positive, due largely to the refined criteria Caltrans is
using to select appropriate design-sequencing projects.
Application of such "lessons-learned" should enable to the
department to strategically select those projects for which
this approach can be cost-effective.
Analysis Prepared by : Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916) 319-2081