BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 1763
                                                                  Page  1


           REPLACE  - 06/02/2010 Technical change (Member name)
          

          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
          AB 1763 (Lieu)
          As Amended  April 8, 2010
          2/3 vote.  Urgency 

           HUMA SERVICES       4-0         APPROPRIATIONS      12-5        
           
           ------------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Beall, Ammiano, Hall,     |Ayes:|Fuentes, Ammiano, Bradford, |
          |     |Swanson                   |     |                            |
          |     |                          |     |Charles Calderon, Coto,     |
          |     |                          |     |Davis,                      |
          |     |                          |     |Monning, Ruskin, Skinner,   |
          |     |                          |     |Solorio,                    |
          |     |                          |     |Torlakson, Torrico          |
          |     |                          |     |                            |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+----------------------------|
          |     |                          |Nays:|Conway, Harkey, Miller,     |
          |     |                          |     |Nielsen, Norby              |
          |     |                          |     |                            |
           ------------------------------------------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY  :  Requires a county to accept the criminal background  
          clearance pertaining to an In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS)  
          provider obtained by the provider's prior county of residence and  
          authorizes the new county of residence to request notice of any  
          subsequent arrests.   Specifically,  this bill  :  

          1)Requires that a county, or an IHSS nonprofit consortium or public  
            authority, to accept a clearance of an individual for whom a  
            criminal background check is required as a condition of being  
            eligible to provide IHSS services issued to the individual in  
            another county.

          2)Requires that the Department of Justice (DOJ) to process a  
            request from a county, an IHSS nonprofit consortium or a public  
            authority having criminal record authority to receive  
            notifications of subsequent arrests when a criminal record  
            clearance for a provider was originally processed by another  
            county, nonprofit consortium or public authority only if:

             a)   The request is submitted by the county, nonprofit  
               consortium, or public authority that is to be substituted to  







                                                                  AB 1763
                                                                  Page  2


               receive notification;

             b)   The request is for the same applicant type as for the  
               original clearance; and,

             c)   The request meets the data and format requirements of the  
               written agreement between the Department of Social Services  
               (DSS) and DOJ.

          3)Requires that DSS, in consultation and coordination with county  
            welfare departments and other designated stakeholders, establish  
            guidelines to provide counties with instructions to consistently  
            and accurately comply with the statutory requirements for the  
            IHSS program.

          4)Makes legislative findings and declarations, including:  that the  
            IHSS program has undergone substantial changes over the past five  
            years, that mechanisms have been put in place to improve IHSS  
            program integrity, that it is important that counties have  
            sufficient direction from the state to implement these changes  
            consistently, and that it is important to minimize the need for  
            IHSS providers and recipients to provide the same information  
            multiple times.
           
          EXISTING LAW  :

          1)Requires criminal background checks of potential IHSS providers  
            as of October 1, 2009, and criminal background checks no later  
            than July 1, 2010, for any provider who is already on the  
            registry as of October 1, 2009, for whom a background check has  
            not previously been provided, as a condition of the provider's  
            continued enrollment in the IHSS program.

          2)Provides that criminal background checks shall be conducted at  
            the provider's expense.

          3)Authorizes DOJ to assess a fee to cover the cost of furnishing  
            criminal history information.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee,  
          costs associated with DOJ processing the requests and sending  
          subsequent arrest notices to the new county would be approximately  
          $800,000 in the first year and $700,000 per year thereafter.  The  
          DOJ has the authority to charge fees to cover the cost of the  
          background check.  Presumably a fee sufficient to cover the cost of  







                                                                  AB 1763
                                                                  Page  3


          the bill would be charged to county welfare departments.  That cost  
          would be state-reimbursable (General Fund) as this bill constitutes  
          a new mandate for counties."

           COMMENTS  :  In July 2009, ABX4 19 (Evans), Chapter 17, Statutes of  
          2009 4th Extraordinary Session, was enacted in conjunction with the  
          2009-10 Budget.  Among its provisions to enhance integrity and  
          prevent fraud in the IHSS program, as a condition of being placed  
          or maintained on a county's IHSS provider registry, ABX4 19  
          requires criminal background checks to be completed for all  
          prospective IHSS providers as of October 1, 2009, and to be  
          completed by July 2, 2010, for anyone already a provider on October  
          1, 2009.  ABX4 19 did not, however, address whether a provider who  
          moves from one county to another, or who has clients in more than  
          one county, must undergo multiple background checks.

          The author states that, "[s]ince IHSS background checks are run  
          through a single statewide system, it is unnecessary for an  
          individual to provide multiple criminal background checks to  
          different counties when a single background check would provide the  
          same information that is necessary for eligibility.  Multiple  
          criminal background checks are not only excessive and unnecessary,  
          but they also impose an extreme hardship on already low income  
          workers.  The cost of a single background check can range from $75  
          to $100.  Requiring multiple background checks could simply be  
          unaffordable for many homecare workers."

          This bill provides that when an IHSS provider who has been cleared  
          after a criminal background check moves to another county and seeks  
          to be an IHSS provider in his or her new county of residence, the  
          new county, nonprofit consortium, or public authority must accept  
          the criminal background clearance from the former county of  
          residence.  This bill also authorizes the new county, nonprofit  
          consortium, or public authority to request notification of a  
          subsequent arrest of an individual who was cleared in another  
          county.  

          This bill currently addresses the issue of multiple background  
          checks in the case of an IHSS provider who moves from one county to  
          another.  It does not yet, however, address the circumstance of a  
          provider who has clients in more than one county and would,  
          therefore, also be required to undergo multiple background checks.   
          Requiring multiple background checks for such providers is likewise  
          inefficient, costly, and unwarranted.  The author and sponsor of  
          this bill intend to continue to work with CWDA, DOJ and other  







                                                                  AB 1763
                                                                  Page  4


          stakeholders to address this remaining issue.
           

          Analysis Prepared by  :    Eric Gelber / HUM. S. / (916) 319-2089 


                                                                   FN: 0004595