BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 1765
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   April 21, 2010

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Felipe Fuentes, Chair

                   AB 1765 (Solorio) - As Amended:  March 11, 2010 

          Policy Committee:                              P.E.R. &  
          S.S.Vote:    4-0

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local  
          Program:NoReimbursable:           

           SUMMARY  

          This bill prohibits a state employee from being furloughed,  
          during a time in which California's unemployment rate reaches or  
          exceeds 8.5%, if the employee is in a position funded at least  
          95% by the federal government, performs services that combat the  
          state's recession, and works for the California Unemployment  
          Insurance Appeals Board (CUIAB) or the Employment Development  
          Department (EDD).  
           
          FISCAL EFFECT


           According to the controller, there are about 10,000 employees at  
          EDD and 800 employees at CUIAB, the majority of which are funded  
          from federal funds. The impact of the bill depends on future  
          unemployment rates and the extent to which furloughs are  
          implemented in the future.


          As an illustration, if the governor were to order three-day per  
          month furloughs in 2011-12 and the unemployment rate were above  
          8.5%, the bill would result in $50 million in annual  
          compensation related costs (mostly federal funds).

           COMMENTS
           
           1)Rationale  . This bill is intended to improve unemployment  
            related services during periods of high unemployment.  
            According to the author, "Employee furloughs in EDD and the  
            CUIAB impede employees' ability to review applications for  
            unemployment insurance, pay unemployment benefits, and approve  








                                                                  AB 1765
                                                                  Page  2

            training that will help unemployed individuals regain  
            marketable skills.  Additionally, furloughs are creating a  
            long-term liability for the state when the affected employees  
            begin to utilize their required banked furlough days."

           2)Background  . In response to last year's budget and cash crisis,  
            the governor issued an executive order requiring mandatory  
            furloughs of two days per month beginning in February 2009,  
            and a second order upping the furloughs to three days per  
            month beginning in July of 2009. Since the July  
            implementation, many state departments, boards, and  
            commissions have been ordered closed three days per month,  
            while others are permitted to put employees on a self-directed  
            furlough program.  The self-directed program allows employees  
            to accrue furlough days and use them like vacation days, upon  
            management approval.  Accrued furlough days have no cash value  
            and must be used within 24 months of the end of the furlough  
            program. The current three-day furlough requirement amounts to  
            a reduction of 13.85% of employees' compensation.

            Furloughs are scheduled to conclude on June 30, 2010 and the  
            governor has proposed alternative employee compensation  
            related savings in 2010-11 (5% pay reduction, 5% increase in  
            employee contributions to retirement, and 5% departmental  
            reductions). 

            Certain departments have received exemptions from the furlough  
            program. These include the California Highway Patrol and 911  
            Dispatchers, the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection  
            (during fire season), the Public Utilities Commission, 

           3)Opposition  . Administration officials state furlough exemptions  
            based on funding sources are inconsistent with long held  
            principles of California's civil service system, which hold  
            that state employees should be treated equitably in pay,  
            benefits, working conditions, without regard to funding  
            sources. They also assert that inconsistent application of  
            furloughs could trigger staffing problems as furloughed  
            employees seek higher pay in exempt departments, and that  
            elimination of furloughs for special fund employees will  
            aggravate shortfalls the currently exist in many special  
            funds.

           4)Related Legislation  . AB 29 X8 (Steinberg) would have exempted  
            most employees funded by non-General Fund sources, plus those  








                                                                  AB 1765
                                                                  Page  3

            working for the major tax collection agencies, from the  
            three-day per month mandatory furlough. The bill passed both  
            houses of the Legislature but was vetoed on March 24, 2010. AB  
            2008 (Arambula), currently in P.E.R. & S.S, exempts employees  
            of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, EDD, FTB,  
            and BOE from furloughs 

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Brad Williams / APPR. / (916) 319-2081