BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 1778
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   May 19, 2010

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Felipe Fuentes, Chair

                      AB 1778 (Lieu) - As Amended:  May 13, 2010

          Policy Committee:                              Arts Vote:5-0

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          No     Reimbursable:              

           SUMMARY  

          This bill stipulates that any state agency financing a  
          commercial promoting the state or a product of the state using  
          public funds shall require that commercial to be filmed in  
          California, and specifies that this requirement does not apply  
          to placement of a California product in any program made by a  
          private entity and involving an agreement with a state entity.

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          Increased costs, to the extent filming in California is more  
          costly than filming that would otherwise be done outside the  
          state.  Such costs are likely to be minor from any one fund in  
          any fiscal year.

           COMMENTS  

           1)Purpose  .  According to the author, "The purpose of this bill  
            is to ensure that all commercials made on behalf of the State  
            of California, and paid for with state funds, are actually  
            filmed in California. When California taxpayers finance the  
            filming of a commercial that promotes California or its  
            products, they expect the money will be spent in California,  
            using the talents of California workers to support our  
            economy?A lot of money is spent on promotional commercial  
            productions every year, and those dollars should be used for  
            local filming and to support jobs in California."

           2)Programs Covered  . According the analysis by the Assembly  
            Committee on Arts, Entertainment, Sports, Tourism, and  
            Internet Media, two state programs were identified that would  
            fall under the bill's advertising limits.  Both of these  








                                                                  AB 1778
                                                                  Page  2

            programs film any commercials in California.

             a)   The California Travel and Tourism Commission, within the  
               Business, Transportation, and Housing Agency, which is  
               responsible for promoting California's image worldwide in  
               order to increase travel to the state.  Current-year  
               funding for tourism promotion totals about $1.7 million, of  
               which $900,000 is from the General Fund.

             b)   The Department of Food and Agriculture's (CDFA's) Buy  
               California Campaign, a partnership between government and  
               industry to promote consumption of California-grown  
               agricultural products to California consumers. This program  
               began in 2001 with a $5 million state contribution to the  
               program. Today, according to CDFA, the state contribution  
               for campaign has dropped to essentially zero, with most of  
               the funding instead coming from federal grant monies. In  
               2009-10, the program anticipates expenditures of $740,000  
               for domestic marketing and another $825,000 for  
               international marketing of California grown products.

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916) 319-2081