BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 1793
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   April 14, 2010

               ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
                                 Norma Torres, Chair
                AB 1793 (Saldana) - As Introduced:  February 10, 2010
           
          SUBJECT  :   Common interest developments:  artificial turf

           SUMMARY  :   Makes the governing documents of a common interest  
          development (CID) void and unenforceable if they prohibit the  
          use or include conditions that effectively prohibit the use of  
          artificial turf or any other synthetic surface that resembles  
          grass.    

           EXISTING LAW  

          1)Provides a provision of the governing documents of a CID void  
            and unenforceable if they do of the following:

             a)   include conditions that effectively prohibit the use of  
               low water-using plants as a group; or

             b)   restrict compliance with local water ordinances required  
               to reduce water consumption water-efficient landscape  
               ordinance in effect pursuant to Government Code Section  
               65596 or restriction on use of water adopted pursuant to  
               Water Code Sections 353 & 375. 

          2)Provides if the governing documents of a CID require the  
            homeowners association (HOA) to approve physical changes to an  
            owner's separate interest, the process must be:

             a)   fair, reasonable and expeditions;

             b)   included in the governing documents; and 

             c)   made in good faith and may not be unreasonable arbitrary  
               or capricious.

          3)Provides a decision on a proposed change on a special interest  
            cannot violate the Fair Employment and Housing Law, building  
            code, or other applicable law governing land use or public  
            safety. 

            FISCAL EFFECT  :   None 








                                                                  AB 1793
                                                                  Page  2


           COMMENTS  :   There are over 41,000 CIDs in the state that range  
          in size from three to 27,000 units. CIDs make up over four  
          million total housing units which represents approximately one  
          quarter of the state's housing stock. In the 1990s, over 60% of  
          all residential construction starts in the state were CIDs.   
          CIDs include condominiums, community apartment projects, and  
          housing cooperatives and planned unit developments.  They are  
          characterized by a separate ownership of dwelling space coupled  
          with an undivided interest in a common property, restricted by  
          covenants and conditions that limit the use of common area, and  
          the separate ownership interests and the management of common  
          property and enforcement of restrictions by an association.   
          CIDs are governed by the Davis Stirling Act (Civil Code Section  
          1350 et al.) as well as the governing documents of the  
          association including the bylaws, declaration, and operating  
          rules. Except when CIDs are first developed, no state agency  
          provides ongoing oversight to these communities.  
           
          Purpose of the bill  :

          According to the sponsor of this bill, San Diego County Water  
          Authority, grass lawns use up to 46 gallons of water per square  
          foot per year in the San Diego region.  Landscape irrigation  
          makes up 70% of the average household water use.  The use of  
          artificial turf in landscaping is one method of reducing water  
          consumption, while still allowing property owners to incorporate  
          expanses of green into their landscaping. 

          In November 2009, SBX7 7 (Steinberg) was enacted requiring water  
          consumption be reduced by 20% per capita by the year 2020.  
          According to the sponsor of the bill, water suppliers are  
          committed to meet this goal.  The purpose of this bill is to  
          expand the available means of conserving water by removing  
          impediments to the use of artificial turf and landscaping in  
          CIDs.  According to the sponsor one impediment is the use of  
          covenants, conditions and restrictions in CIDs that prohibit the  
          use of artificial turf.    
           
          AB 1061 (Lieu), Chapter 503, Statutes of 2009, made the  
          governing documents of a HOA void and unenforceable if they  
          prohibited or had the effect of prohibiting the use of low-water  
          using plants or violated locally adopted water-efficient  
          landscape ordinances.  CIDs may apply rules that conform to  
          legal requirements as to water-efficient landscapes.  According  








                                                                  AB 1793
                                                                  Page  3

          to the sponsor, because the bill did not specifically include  
          artificial turf as a possible water-efficient landscaping option  
          some HOAs have prohibited homeowners from installing it.    

          At the time homeowners purchase in CIDs they receive a copy of  
          the CCRs and other governing documents of the HOA which detail  
          the rules and regulations of the HOA.  If the HOA has a process  
          for approving homeowners architectural change to their home, it  
          will be outlined in the governing documents.   It is unlikely  
          that the governing documents would specifically prohibit  
          artificial turf.  However, in some HOAs homeowners could be  
          required to get the approval of the architectural review  
          committee before making changes to their home including  
          landscaping changes.  The procedure must be fair, reasonable and  
          provide for prompt deadlines.  If a homeowner is denied approval  
          of a proposed change, the decision can be appealed at a meeting  
          of the board of directors. 

           Arguments in opposition  :

          The Executive Council of Homeowners, which represents  
          approximately 1,550 CIDs and 250,000 homeowners, is opposed to  
          this bill.  ECHO supports the use of water-efficient plants in  
          CIDs; however, they feel this bill goes too far by stating that  
          restrictions on the use of artificial turf are unenforceable and  
          does not take into account the desires and esthetics of the  
          community.  
           
          Committee amendments  : 

           The committee may wish to consider an amendment to clarify that  
          a HOA can apply design and quality standards for the  
          installation of artificial turf as long as they conform to the  
          legal requirements as to water-efficient landscapes.  The  
          amendment will give HOAs the ability to set standards regarding  
          the color of the turf, the timeline for replacing it, and other  
          design standards while not prohibiting its use. 

          On page 2, after line 22 insert the following:

               ( c ) This section shall not prohibit an association from  
               applying landscaping rules and regulations established in  
               the governing documents that establish design standards and  
               quality standards for the installation of artificial turf,  
               to the extent the rules and regulations fully conform with  








                                                                  AB 1793
                                                                  Page  4

               the requirements of subdivision (a). 
                
          REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :   

           Support 

           San Diego County Water Authority (sponsor)
          Association of California Water Agencies
          Association of Synthetic Grass Installers
          Cucamonga Valley Water District
          East Bay Municipal Utility District 

           Opposition 
           
          Executive Council of Homeowners (ECHO)
           
          Analysis Prepared by  :    Lisa Engel / H. & C.D. / (916) 319-2085