BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    





                                                                  AB 1824

                                                                  Page  1  
           

          GOVERNOR'S VETO
          AB 1824 (Monning)
          As Amended  May 11, 2010
          2/3 vote
           


          ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY          9-0  APPROPRIATIONS   14-3        

           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |     |Nava, Miller, Blakeslee,  |Ayes:|Fuentes, Ammiano,         |
          |     |Chesbro, Davis, Feuer,    |     |Bradford,                 |
          |     |Monning, Ruskin, Smyth    |     |Charles Calderon, Coto,   |
          |     |                          |     |Davis,                    |
          |Ayes:|                          |     |De Leon, Hall, Harkey,    |
          |     |                          |     |Miller, Skinner, Solorio, |
          |     |                          |     |Torlakson, Torrico        |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |     |                          |Nays:|Conway, Nielsen, Norby    |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 


          ASSEMBLY:        73-0     (May 13, 2010)  SENATE:   30-3     (August  
          2, 2010)            

            
          SUMMARY  :   Prohibits a person from using or selling a chemical  
          that is detrimental to a sewage disposal system, as specified.   
          Specifically,  this bill  :  

          1)Prohibits a person from using a chemical that is detrimental  
            to a sewage disposal system in a chemical toilet, a  
            recreational vehicle, or a waste facility of a vessel.

          2)Prohibits a person from selling a chemical that is detrimental  
            to a sewage disposal system in a container that indicates that  
            the chemical could be used in a chemical toilet or a waste  
            facility of a recreational vehicle or vessel.











                                                                  AB 1824

                                                                  Page  2  
           


          3)Defines a chemical that is detrimental to a sewage disposal  
            system as any of the following:



             a)   2-bromo-2-nitropropane-1,3-diol, known as bronopol;



             b)   1-(3-chlorallyl)-3,5,7-triaza-1-azoniaadamantane  
               chloride, known as dowicil;



             c)   Formaldehyde;



             d)   Glutaraldehyde;



             e)   Para-formaldehyde;



             f)   Para-dichlorobenzene; or,



             g)   A chemical identified by DTSC as being detrimental to a  
               sewage disposal system, in regulations that may be adopted  
               by DTSC.



          4)Authorizes the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC),  
            by regulation, to limit or prohibit the use or sale of a  
            chemical detrimental to a sewage disposal system in a product  
            used for a chemical toilet, a recreational vehicle, or a  










                                                                  AB 1824

                                                                  Page  3  
           

            vessel.



          5)Deletes the requirement for DTSC to develop and adopt  
            regulations to define nonbiodegradable toxic chemicals and to  
            set limitations on the sale of those chemicals, but authorizes  
            DTSC to do so.



          6)Authorizes DTSC to further regulate chemical toilet additives.  
             

           FISCAL EFFECT  :   According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee, minor, absorbable costs to DTSC to enforce a ban of a  
          list of chemicals that is slightly longer than the list of  
          chemicals already banned.  

           COMMENTS:    A typical septic system (sewage disposal system)  
          uses natural processes to treat wastewater onsite, as opposed to  
          offsite at a municipal wastewater treatment plant.  Septic tanks  
          promote partial breakdown of contaminants by microorganisms  
          (bacteria) naturally present in wastewater.  However, when  
          chemicals, such as formaldehyde, are added to septic systems,  
          they can cause bacteria in the system to die.  When this  
          happens, the septic system cannot treat waste adequately and may  
          clog.  Clogged systems can send inadequately or incompletely  
          treated sewage to the surface, threatening the health of people  
          or animals that come into contact with it.  Inadequately treated  
          sewage can also percolate to ground water, where the chemicals  
          and untreated wastewater could contaminate nearby wells, rivers  
          and streams.

          According to the sponsors of the bill, most recreational vehicle  
          (RV) owners are unaware that there are products that can be more  
          safely used in RV toilets in place of those products which can  
          be detrimental to septic systems.  Therefore, RV owners continue  
          to use products in their RV toilets that degrade septic systems.  
           The sponsors argue that when these toilets are emptied into  
          septic systems at RV parks and campgrounds, the septic systems  










                                                                  AB 1824

                                                                  Page  4  
           

          may start to fail.  

          Existing law prohibits the use of non-biodegradable toxic  
          chemicals (which is defined in regulation and includes a list of  
          chemicals) in a chemical toilet, recreational vehicle, or waste  
          facility.  It also prohibits the sale of a non-biodegradable  
          toxic chemical in a container which indicates that the chemical  
          could be used in a chemical toilet, a waste facility of a  
          recreational vehicle, or a waste facility of a vessel as the  
          term vessel.  This bill creates an additional list of chemicals  
          that are prohibited for use in, or for sale for, chemical  
          toilets.  
           
           As part of the Green Chemistry Initiative, in 2009, the Governor  
          signed AB 1879 (Feuer and Huffman) Chapter 559, Statutes of  
          2008, into law.  AB 1879 requires DTSC to adopt regulations by  
          January 1, 2011, to identify and prioritize chemicals of  
          concern, to evaluate alternatives, and to specify regulatory  
          responses to limit exposure or reduce the level of hazard posed  
          by chemicals of concern.  The Green Chemistry program should  
          yield a comprehensive process to identify and manage chemicals  
          of concern in consumer products and their alternatives.  
           

          GOVERNOR'S VETO MESSAGE  :

               This bill prohibits the sale and use of a  
               specified list of chemicals in chemical toilets  
               and waste facilities of recreational vehicles.

               Current law already gives the Department of Toxic  
               Substances Control (DTSC) the ability to address  
               the issue of chemical toilet products in  
               recreational vehicles.  Additionally, DTSC has the  
               ability to address this issue through the Green  
               Chemistry process.

               This bill presents a scenario that is ripe for a  
               Green Chemistry approach:  competing science on  
               each side of the issue; concern about the  
               effectiveness of alternative products for the  










                                                                  AB 1824

                                                                  Page  5  
           

               consumer's intended use; consumer reaction in the  
               wake of an ineffective alternative; and questions  
               as to whether banning particular chemicals will  
               actually address the underlying problem.

               Neither I, nor members of the legislature, are  
               best equipped to answer these questions.  We need  
               science and scientists to undertake this challenge  
               and develop a solution that addresses the chemical  
               problem and provides the consumer with a product  
               that is both economical and effective for its  
               intended purpose.

               Under the leadership of my Secretary for  
               Environmental Protection, the Green Chemistry  
               process is well underway at DTSC.  We will have  
               regulations adopted by January 1, 2011 and DTSC  
               should address the issue raised in this bill  
               either under that process or under their existing  
               authority.  




           Analysis Prepared by:     Shannon McKinney / E.S. & T.M. / (916)  
          319-3965 



                                                                FN: 0006318