BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                  AB 1853|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AB 1853
          Author:   De La Torre (D)
          Amended:  8/31/10 in Senate
          Vote:     21

           
           ALL PRIOR VOTES NOT RELEVANT
           

           SUBJECT  :    Corcoran District Hospital:  design-build

           SOURCE  :     Author


           DIGEST  :    This is a new bill.  This bill contains the  
          contents of SB 837 (Florez) which is in Assembly Rules  
          Committee.  This bill authorizes the Corcoran District  
          Hospital, upon approval of the board of directors of the  
          hospital, to use a design-build procedure when assigning  
          contracts to the construction of a building or improvements  
          directly related to the construction of an outpatient  
          facility building at the hospital. 

           ANALYSIS  :    

          Existing law: 

          1. Requires local officials, under the Local Agency Public  
             Construction Act, to invite bids for construction  
             projects and then award contracts to the lowest  
             responsible bidder under the traditional design-build  
             project delivery system. 

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               AB 1853
                                                                Page  
          2

          2. Defines "design-build" as a procurement process in which  
             both the design and construction of a project are  
             procured from a single entity. 

          3. Defines "best-value" as a value determined by objective  
             criteria related to price, features, functions, and life  
             cycle costs. 

          4. Defines "project" as the construction of a building and  
             improvements directly related to the construction of a  
             building, and specifies that construction of other  
             infrastructure, including, but not limited to, streets  
             and highways, public rail transit, or water resources  
             facilities and infrastructure are not to be considered  
             "projects." 

          5. Authorizes counties to use the design-build method for  
             projects costing more than $2.5 million. 

          6. Authorizes cities to use the design-build method for  
             projects costing more than $1 million. 

          7. Authorizes the Sonoma Valley Health Care District to use  
             design-build contracting for the construction of  
             buildings and improvements in excess of $2.5 million  
             directly related to a hospital or health facility  
             building, which is required to be reviewed and inspected  
             according to the standards of the Alfred E. Alquist  
             Hospital Facilities Seismic Safety Act of 1983. 

          8. Authorizes the Orange County Sanitation District to use  
             design-build contracting for projects, including, but  
             not limited to, public wastewater facilities, in excess  
             of $6 million. 

          9. Authorizes the Santa Clara Valley Water District to use  
             design-build contracting for building contracts. 

          10.Authorizes redevelopment agencies to use design-build  
             contracting for 10 public improvement projects in excess  
             of $1 million subject to approval by the State Public  
             Works Board. 

          11.Requires local officials to prepare documents describing  







                                                               AB 1853
                                                                Page  
          3

             the project and its specifications; to prepare a  
             detailed request for proposals that invites competitive  
             bids; to establish a detailed procedure to pre-qualify  
             design-build entities; and to establish the procedures  
             to select the design-build entity. 

          12.Requires the legislative body to establish and enforce  
             labor compliance programs. 

          13.Requires local officials to collect specified types of  
             information when pre-qualifying design-build entities. 

          14.Requires a prospective design-build entity to list its  
             proposed mechanical subcontractors and licenses; report  
             past worker safety violations, contracting problems,  
             contract defaults, license violations, payroll  
             violations, and bankruptcies; and verify this  
             information under oath. 

          15.Requires local officials to select the design-build  
             entity by using either a competitive bidding process in  
             which the award goes to the lowest responsible bidder or  
             a best value competition in which local officials set  
             the criteria. 

          16.Requires that price, expertise, life cycle costs,  
             skilled labor force availability, and safety records  
             account for at least 10 percent each of the total weight  
             of consideration of all best value factors. 

          17.Requires the local agency to rank the top three  
             responsive bidders; award the contract to the  
             responsible bidder whose proposal county or city  
             officials rank as "the most advantageous;" and identify  
             the second- and third-ranked bidders after it publicly  
             announces the award. 

          18.Requires that skilled labor force availability be  
             determined by the existence of an agreement with a  
             registered and approved apprenticeship program. 

          19.Requires the winning design-build entity to be bonded  
             and carry errors-and-omissions insurance to cover its  
             design and architectural services. 







                                                               AB 1853
                                                                Page  
          4


          20.Requires the entity to adhere to the local agency's  
             performance criteria and design standards and obtain the  
             local agency's written consent for any deviations from  
             these standards, and authorizes the local agency to hire  
             a design professional to ensure compliance. 

          21.Authorizes the winning design-build entity to use  
             subcontractors not listed in its original bid, but  
             requires the entity to award these subcontracts by  
             following a process set by the local agency, including  
             publishing notices and setting deadlines. 

          22.Permits the local agency to retain no more than five  
             percent of the contract if the local agency's bid  
             request required the design-build entity to carry a  
             performance and payment bond. 

          23.Requires any local agency that uses design-build  
             contracting to submit a report to the Legislative  
             Analyst's Office (LAO) containing specified information  
             that includes, but is not limited to, a description of  
             the Labor Force Compliance Program and an assessment of  
             the project impact of "skilled labor force  
             availability." 

          24.Repeals the authorization for counties, the Orange  
             County Sanitation District, the Santa Clara Valley Water  
             District, and the Sonoma Valley Health Care District to  
             use design-build contracts on January 1, 2011. 

          25.Repeals the authorization for cities and redevelopment  
             agencies to use design-build contracts on January 1,  
             2016. 

          This bill authorizes the Corcoran District Hospital, upon  
          approval of the board of directors of the hospital, to use  
          a design-build procedure when assigning contracts to the  
          construction of a building or improvements directly related  
          to the construction of an outpatient facility building at  
          the hospital. 

           Background  








                                                               AB 1853
                                                                Page  
          5

          The Local Agency Public Construction Act requires local  
          officials to invite bids for construction projects and then  
          award contracts to the lowest responsible bidder.  This  
          design-bid-build method is the traditional approach to  
          public works construction. 

          Private companies often use the design-build method for  
          construction projects.  Under the design-build method, a  
          single contract covers the design and construction of a  
          project with a single company or consortium that acts as  
          both the project designer and builder.  The design-build  
          entity arranges all architectural, engineering, and  
          construction services, and is responsible for delivering  
          the project at a guaranteed price and schedule based upon  
          performance criteria set by the public agency.  The  
          design-build method can be set by the public agency.  The  
          design-build method can be faster, and therefore, cheaper,  
          than the design-bid-build method, but it requires a higher  
          level of management sophistication since design and  
          construction may occur simultaneously. 

          Advocates for the design-build method of contracting for  
          public works contend that project schedule savings can be  
          realized because only a single request for proposals is  
          needed to select the project's designer and builder.   The  
          more traditional design-bid-build project approach requires  
          the separate selection of the design consultant or  
          contractor, completion of design, and then advertising for  
          bids and selection of the construction contractor.    
          Proponents add that design-build allows the overlap of  
          design and construction activities, resulting in additional  
          time savings and lower project costs.  By avoiding the  
          delays and change orders that result from the traditional  
          design-bid-build method of contracting, proponents argue  
          that officials can deliver public works faster and cheaper.  


          The design-build language in current law is based on a  
          compromise struck in 2000 among local officials, labor  
          groups, and contractors.  Local officials wanted the  
          flexibility and potential cost savings offered by  
          design-build contracts.  Labor unions wanted to ensure that  
          counties pre-qualify employers to protect workers'  
          interests.  Contractors wanted to be sure they had fair  







                                                               AB 1853
                                                                Page  
          6

          access to county contracts.  Further changes to the  
          language, consistent with the principles of the 2000  
          compromise were made by SB 287 (Cox), Chapter 376, Statutes  
          of 2005; SB 416 (Ashburn), Chapter 585, Statutes 2007,  
          which extended this authority to use design-build  
          contracting for the construction of buildings and directly  
          related improvements to all 58 counties in the state; AB  
          642 (Wolk), Chapter 314, Statues 2008, which extended this  
          authority to use design-build contracting for the  
          construction of buildings and directly related improvements  
          to all cities in the state; SB 1699 (Wiggins), Chapter 415,  
          Statutes of 2008, which extended this authority to use  
          design-build contracting for the construction of buildings  
          and improvements in excess of $2.5 million directly related  
          to a Sonoma Valley Health Care District hospital or health  
          facility building; and SB 4 X2 (Cogdill), Chapter 2,  
          Statutes of 2009-10, Second Extraordinary Session, which  
          extended this authority to use design-build contracting for  
          10 redevelopment projects in excess of $1 million subject  
          to approval by the State Public Works Board. 

          The LAO issued a report to the Legislature on February 3,  
          2005, titled "Design-Build:  An Alternative Construction  
          System."  After analyzing the claims of proponents and  
          opponents and reviewing the experience of counties that  
          were authorized to use design-build at the time, LAO  
          recommended "the Legislature grant design-build authority  
          only to buildings and directly related infrastructure.   
          There are more complex issues associated with other public  
          works projects such as transportation, public transit, and  
          water resources facilities.  Evaluation of design-build as  
          a construction delivery option for these other  
          infrastructure facilities is beyond the scope of this  
          report." 

          California currently has 80 health care districts.  Health  
          care districts were known as hospital districts prior to  
          1994.  Health care districts are formed to "establish,  
          maintain, and operate health care facilities," including,  
          but not limited to, hospitals.  Health care districts are  
          governed by elected boards of directors.  Health care  
          districts throughout the state need to retrofit existing  
          buildings or build new facilities in order to comply with  
          the state's seismic safety law.  These districts are faced  







                                                               AB 1853
                                                                Page  
          7

          with escalating construction costs and are looking for the  
          most cost-efficient ways to meet seismic standards and  
          provide well-designed and built state-of-the-art facilities  
          to provide health care to the people of the state.  One of  
          these is design-build contracting. 

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  Yes   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  No

           SUPPORT :   (Unable to verify at time of writing)

          California Association of Sheet Metal and Air Conditioning  
          Contractors
          Corcoran District Hospital
          City of Corcoran
          Corcoran Latino Roundtable
          Kings County Board of Supervisors, District II


          TSM:mw  8/31/10   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****