BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 1879
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   May 5, 2010

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Felipe Fuentes, Chair

                     AB 1879 (Beall) - As Amended:  April 8, 2010

          Policy Committee:                               
          UtilitiesVote:14-0

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          No     Reimbursable:              

           SUMMARY  

          This bill requires the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) to open  
          a proceeding to examine whether the three-year limit on billing  
          adjustments for meter and billing errors is an appropriate  
          timeframe for small commercial customers of gas and electrical  
          corporations.

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          One-time special fund cost of $150,000 for one administrative  
          law judge position to oversee the proceeding.  [Public Utilities  
          Reimbursement Account]

           COMMENTS  

           1)Purpose  .  According to the author, this bill is the result of  
            a situation in his district in which a restaurant was  
            under-billed by Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) for a  
            period of at least three years due to a faulty meter. The  
            restaurateur felt that when PG&E backbilled for the  
            under-collected charges going back three years, it was unfair  
            because residential customers are only backbilled for three  
            months.


           2)Background  . The above differential in backbilling is pursuant  
            to a PUC tariff promulgated in 1986.  According to the PUC,  
            the reason for the difference is because there are larger  
            dollar amounts involved with non-residential customers. For  
            example, the amount the restaurant was backbilled was around  
            $60,000, or about $1,700 per month.  At the time of the PUC  








                                                                  AB 1879
                                                                  Page  2

            decision, the utilities asserted that three months is  
            sufficient for residential ratepayers because the utilities  
            have procedures to detect billing and meter errors more  
            promptly. Since billing for commercial customers is usually  
            more complex and involves larger amounts of money, the PUC  
            concluded it was appropriate to backbill commercial customers  
            for three years.



            The PUC has been experiencing increased calls from small  
            businesses who believe they were unfairly backbilled.  PUC  
            Commissioner Bohn has been investigating the backbilling issue  
            and has endorsed the policy of treating small businesses the  
            same as residential customers in terms of the duration of  
            allowable backbilling. Subsequently, Commissioner Bohn drafted  
            an Order Instituting a Rulemaking. The Order should be taken  
            up on the PUC agenda within the next month or so.


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916) 319-2081