BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 1900
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   May 12, 2010

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Felipe Fuentes, Chair

                    AB 1900 (Skinner) - As Amended:  May 3, 2010 

          Policy Committee:                              Public Safety  
          Vote:        5-0

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          Yes    Reimbursable:              Yes

           SUMMARY  

          This bill requires pregnant state and local inmates and wards be  
          restrained in the least restrictive way possible, consistent  
          with security needs, when transported to and from detention  
          facilities.

          This bill also requires the Corrections Standards Authority  
          (CSA) to establish minimum standards for state and local  
          correctional facilities to ensure that inmates or wards known to  
          be pregnant are never shackled by the wrists, ankles, or both,  
          during labor, deliver, recovery or during transport to or from a  
          state or local correctional facility, unless specific security  
          needs dictate otherwise. 

           FISCAL EFFECT

           Minor, presumably absorbable, costs to CSA to develop  
          regulations regarding issues CSA has considerable familiarity  
          with, considering CSA was directed to adopt similar regulations  
          for local detention facilities in 2006 and did so for state  
          facilities. 

          In that this bill does not require local detention facilities to  
          provide additional services, beyond not shackling pregnant  
          inmates, any mandate exposure should be minimal.   

           COMMENTS  

           1)Rationale  . The author's intent is to require the adoption of  
            regulations for local detention facilities regarding the  
            restraint of pregnant inmates and wards. The author contends  








                                                                  AB 1900
                                                                  Page  2

            that while state facilities are largely in compliance with  
            regulations adopted pursuant to AB 478 (Lieber), Statutes of  
            2005, regulations for local facilities were never adopted,  
            resulting in disparities between counties. 

           2)Current Law  :

             a)   Specifies that pregnant prison inmates be transported in  
               the least restrictive way possible when transported to and  
               from a prison, consistent with security needs. Upon arrival  
               at the hospital, once the inmate is in active labor and  
               recovery, the inmate shall not be shackled by the wrists or  
               ankles, unless deemed necessary for safety and security.   

             b)   Requires CSA to establish minimum standards for state  
               and local correctional facilities, including that a woman  
               in active labor not be shackled by the wrists or ankles  
               during transport to a hospital, during delivery, and while  
               in recovery, unless necessary for safety and security.


             c)   Specifies a juvenile ward shall not be shackled by the  
               wrists or ankles during labor, including during transport  
               to a hospital, during delivery, and while in recovery after  
               giving birth, subject to the security needs.  Pregnant  
               wards temporarily taken to a hospital outside the facility  
               for the purposes of childbirth shall be transported in the  
               least restrictive way possible, consistent with the  
               legitimate security needs. Upon arrival at the hospital,  
               once in active labor, the ward shall not be shackled by the  
               wrists or ankles, unless deemed necessary for the safety  
               and security.   


           3)Suggested Amendment - Commas and Clauses  . Though the author's  
            intent is to prevent shackling while a pregnant inmate in  
            transit or in labor or recovery, the sentence structure  
            throughout the bill seems to prohibit shackling a pregnant  
            inmate at any time. The author may wish to clarify the intent  
            of this language.  


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Geoff Long / APPR. / (916) 319-2081