BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 1956
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   April 14, 2010

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Felipe Fuentes, Chair

                   AB 1956 (Monning) - As Amended:  April 5, 2010 

          Policy Committee:                              Water, Parks and  
          Wildlife     Vote:                            12-0

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          No     Reimbursable:              No

           SUMMARY  

          This bill authorizes the Department of Fish and Game (DFG) to  
          allow condor preservation programs to feed wild California  
          condors, pursuant to a memorandum of understanding (MOU).   
          Specifically, this bill:

          1)States that the MOU be consistent with certain conditions,  
            including:

             a)   Feed for condors be limited to livestock euthanized by  
               shooting with nonlead ammunition or that died from natural  
               causes; wildlife killed by traffic on state highways and  
               collected by the Department of Transportation; and animals  
               that died from natural causes on private property, if  
               transported to the feeding site by the landowner.

             b)   Feeding sites be a safe distance from nearby hazards and  
               appropriately situated, as specified.

          2)Exempts DFG, when providing animal carcasses for condor  
            feeding purposes, from prohibitions on transporting animal  
            carcasses.

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          1)Costs to DFG in 2010-11 and 2011-12 of approximately $125,000  
            to prepare new MOUs.  (General Fund or grants from private  
            sources.)

          2)Potential minor ongoing costs, likely less than $50,000  
            annually, to periodically review and revise MOUs and consult  








                                                                  AB 1956
                                                                  Page  2

            with interested parties.  (General Fund or grants from private  
            sources.)

           COMMENTS  

           1)Rationale .  California condors likely would have gone extinct  
            if not for a captive breeding program began about 25 years  
            ago.  Now, small numbers of these bred condors are being  
            reintroduced into the wild in mountainous regions of Southern  
            California and the Central Coast.   

             Proponents contend survival of the California condor depends  
            on continued feeding programs.  This is because the young,  
            reintroduced condors-bred in captivity and unschooled in the  
            ways of the wild-oftentimes do not know how or where to  
            scavenge for carrion.  

            DFG lacks authority to enter into MOUs with private  
            organizations to provide for the feeding of condors.  Yet,  
            such private groups continue to provide food for condors to  
            help ensure their survival.  This bill expressly provides such  
            authority to DFG.  In addition, it specifies conditions to be  
            included in these MOUs that, according to proponents, ensures  
            condors are fed without further endangering them.  In  
            addition, the bill facilitates DFG's ability to transport dead  
            animals, should it choose to do so as part of a feeding  
            program.  

          2)Background  .  The California condor is North America's largest  
            terrestrial bird, with a wingspan of nine and a half feet.   
            Hundreds of years ago, California condors were common in  
            California and nearby regions.  More recently, a variety of  
            factors-most significantly poaching, habitat destruction,  
            chemical pollution, and lead shot ingestion-dramatically  
            reduced the condor population.  California condors were listed  
            as endangered species in 1967; their numbers continued to  
            dwindle, nonetheless.  In the early 1980s, there were less  
            than 30 condors alive in the wild.

            To stave off extinction, the last wild condor was captured in  
            1987.  An intensive captive breeding program began at San  
            Diego Wild Animal Park and the Los Angeles Zoo.  Fifteen years  
            later, biologists began reintroducing condors into the wild.   
            Today, there are 87 wild California condors in the state.   
            Captive and wild birds combined, there are only 350 California  








                                                                  AB 1956
                                                                  Page  3

            condors in existence.  The bird's survival remains  
            questionable.  

           3)Support  .  Conservation groups contend that DFG needs the  
            express legal authority to allow condor feeding programs that  
            will better ensure the survival of the endangered bird.

           4)Opposition  .  In policy committee, opponents, including several  
            hunting organizations, protested the proposed use of Fish and  
            Game Preservation Fund (FGPF) money to pay for the feeding of  
            California condors, a nongame bird.  Amendments taken in  
            policy committee seem have resolved opponents' concerns. 

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Jay Dickenson / APPR. / (916) 319-2081