BILL ANALYSIS
AB 1973
Page 1
Date of Hearing: May 19, 2010
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Felipe Fuentes, Chair
AB 1973 (Swanson) - As Amended: May 12, 2010
Policy Committee: Revenue and
Taxation Vote: 9-0
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
No Reimbursable:
SUMMARY
This bill provides, for taxable years 2011 through 2015, an
employer hiring credit against income or corporation taxes for
firms that hire ex-offenders that have been convicted of a
felony. Specifically, the bill:
1)Provides a credit of 20% of gross salary, up to $5,000 for the
first and second complete year of employment, and allows
unused credits to be carried forward for up to eight years.
2)Does not apply to the hiring of an ex-offender who is required
to register as a sex offender under Penal Code Section 290,
(or equivalent laws for other states, the federal government,
or the military. Also does not apply to ex-offender convicted
of a violent felony.
3)Requires that deductions or alternative credits allowed under
existing law for wages paid be reduced by this credit.
FISCAL EFFECT
According to preliminary estimates by the Franchise Tax Board,
the bill will result in revenue losses of $20 million in
2011-12, $40 million in 2012-13, $80 million in 2013-14, and $90
million in 2014-15.
COMMENTS
1)Rationale . The bill is intended to help ex-offenders find
employment upon returning to their communities. The author
asserts that formerly incarcerated individuals have an
AB 1973
Page 2
extremely difficult time finding employment, which he
indicates is a major factor contributing to California's high
recidivism rate.
2)Background . California provides hiring tax credits for
employers operating in enterprise zones, manufacturing
enhancement areas, targeted tax areas, and local agency
military base recovery areas. The 2009-10 budget package also
provides for a $3,000 per full time employee hiring credit to
small employers (less than 20 employees). The credit is
limited to small businesses (20 or fewer employees), and is
capped at $400 million for all taxable years.
3)Opponents question whether the credit would stimulate new
hiring of ex-offenders, or result in revenue losses related to
hiring that would have taken place anyway.
Analysis Prepared by : Brad Williams / APPR. / (916) 319-2081