BILL ANALYSIS
SENATE REVENUE & TAXATION COMMITTEE
Senator Lois Wolk, Chair
AB 1973 - Swanson
Amended: June 28, 2010
Hearing: July 1, 2010 Tax Levy Fiscal: Yes
SUMMARY: Expands the Existing Hiring Credit for Small
Businesses That Employ Ex-Offenders or
Individuals Who Have Been Unemployed for 1 Year
or More.
EXISTING LAW allows various tax credits designed to
provide tax relief for taxpayers who incur certain expenses
or to influence behavior, including business practices.
Current law provides for the following geographically
targeted economic development areas (G-TEDAs): Enterprise
Zones, Manufacturing Enhancement Areas, Targeted Tax Areas,
and Local Agency Military Base Recovery Areas. Special tax
incentives are provided to taxpayers conducting business
activities within a G-TEDA. These incentives include a
hiring credit equal to a percentage of wages paid to
qualified employees.
Allows a credit for taxable years beginning on or
after January 1, 2009, to qualified employers equal to
$3,000 for each net increase in qualified full-time
employees hired during the taxable year. The credit is
limited to small businesses (i.e., taxpayers with 20 or
fewer employees as of the last day of the preceding taxable
year). The credit is capped at roughly $400 million for all
taxable years.
THIS BILL allows an expanded $5,000 credit-operative
January 1, 201l-for each net increase in "qualified
full-time employees" hired by a qualified employer. For
AB 1973 - Swanson
Page 3
purposes of this expanded credit, a "qualified full-time
employee" is defined as a person who meets the criteria for
the existing hiring credit and who is an ex-offender who
was convicted of a felony or a person who has been
unemployed for 12 or more consecutive months prior to being
hired by a qualified employer.
Specifies that the expanded credit shall not apply to
sex offenders or individuals convicted of a serious or
violent felony, as those terms are defined in the Penal
Code.
FISCAL EFFECT:
Because this bill does not increase the $400 million
limit on tax credits in current law, it is estimated that
there would be no remaining amounts to be allocated for tax
credits in the 2011 tax year. Therefore, the Franchise Tax
Board (FTB) estimates that there would be no revenue impact
from the bill as amended May 28, 2010.
COMMENTS:
A. Purpose of the Bill
The author has provided the following statement in
support of this bill:
California is currently experiencing unprecedented,
double-digit rates of unemployment. The formerly
incarcerated and people that have been unemployed for
more than 12 months have had an extraordinarily
difficult time securing a job. It is also well known
that these individuals can also be a great burden on
governmental resources. The formerly incarcerated and
the chronically unemployed become reliant on the ever
decreasing safety net to support themselves and their
families.
AB 1973 - Swanson
Page 3
Additionally, 70% of released prisoners will return to
prison at a cost to the state of $49,000 per year.
They threaten the public safety of our communities
while adding to the caseload of under funded law
enforcement agencies and the overworked criminal
justice system. Research clearly states that
employment is a significant factor in reducing
recidivism.
Also, recognizing the importance of small businesses
in the economic recovery of California, AB 1973 will
create incentives for businesses with fewer than 20
employees to hire the chronically unemployed or the
formerly incarcerated. The $5,000 tax incentive
provided in AB 1973 will greatly benefit small
businesses and will positively impact the state
bottom-line.
B.Background:
AB 1973 increases the credit amount and the number
of small businesses that qualify under the existing Jobs
Tax Credit. On February 20, 2009, Governor Schwarzenegger
signed into law ABX3 15 (Krekorian), Chapter 10, Statutes
of 2009, as part of the 2009-10 Special Session Budget
Agreement. ABX3 15 provided a $3,000 credit per qualified
full-time employee for employers with 20 or fewer
employees. AB 1973 expands the existing Jobs Tax Credit to
$5,000 per qualified full-time employees who are
ex-offenders convicted of a felony or individuals
unemployed for at least a year.
C. Tax Expenditures
The Department of Finance defines a tax expenditure as
a "deduction, exclusion, exemption, credit, or any other
tax benefit as provided by the state." When policy makers
institute new tax expenditures, the state agrees to forego
tax revenues in the hopes of providing increased equity in
the tax system or seeking to change private investment
behavior. This bill would enact a tax expenditure in the
form of a hiring credit, designed to encourage the
AB 1973 - Swanson
Page 3
employment of hard-to-hire individuals.
As California faces another fiscal imbalance, policy
makers are increasingly interested in the state's tax
expenditures, their goals and objectives as well as their
efficacy. California foregoes approximately $50 billion in
revenue each year due to tax expenditures. These range
from the exclusion from income for pension contributions
and social security benefits to subsidies for other types
of economic behavior deemed preferable by the Legislature,
such as the mortgage interest deduction to spur
homeownership, the research and development credit to
stimulate high-paying jobs and new exciting consumer
products and services. Tax expenditures evoke passionate
and complicated debates, chiefly regarding whether state
legislative action to forego tax revenues from specified
taxpayers provides superior benefits than commensurate
direct spending programs or general tax reductions. Quite
different from direct spending measures, the Legislature
may only limit, reduce, or eliminate tax credits by a 2/3
vote of each house of the Legislature.
C. Is Expanding the Jobs Credit Premature?
Under the existing Jobs Tax Credit, the FTB reports
that, as of June 5, 2010, 3,214 personal income tax and
business entity returns had been filed, with cumulative
hiring credits totaling only $25.5 million. At this rate,
there is plenty of time for the existing $400 million cap
to be reached.
D. Are Hiring Credits Effective?
A main question remains as to whether hiring credits
actually work. A recent paper -co-authored by Daniel
Wilson, assistant director of the Center for the Study of
Innovation and Productivity at the Federal Reserve Bank of
San Francisco and Robert Chirinko of the University of
Illinois-attempts to answer this question. The paper
examined the period between January 1990 and August 2009,
and found that, among states where employers could qualify
AB 1973 - Swanson
Page 3
for credits immediately after enactment of the credit
legislation, there was a slight employment increase of
0.12%. By contrast, states that offered the credits
retroactively actually saw a slight decline of 0.06% in
employment. These findings would suggest that hiring
credits, at least at the state level, are not an effective
tool for stimulating job growth.
Moreover, the state already invests toward the goals
of spurring employment for hard- to-hire individuals, such
as job training programs, welfare- to-work programs, and
G-TEDA tax credits. The Committee may wish to consider the
efficacy and efficiency of existing efforts of federal,
state, and local agencies to assist the targeted population
obtain employment before allowing the expansion of a tax
credit that may duplicate current programs and could
further strain the state's finances if the credit
allocation is increased.
Support and Opposition
Support: California Black Chamber of Commerce, City
of Oakland, Crossroads, Inc.
Oppose:California Tax Reform Association
---------------------------------
Consultant: Meg Svoboda
AB 1973 - Swanson
Page 3