BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 2009
                                                                  Page  1

          CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS
          AB 2009 (Logue)
          As Amended  June 16, 2010
          Majority vote
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |ASSEMBLY:  |71-0 |(April 8, 2010) |SENATE: |34-0 |(August 9,     |
          |           |     |                |        |     |2010)          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
            
           Original Committee Reference:    PUB. S.  

           SUMMARY  :  Permits counties to use excess funds from the state's  
          DNA Identification Fund to reimburse law enforcement and  
          district attorneys for use of an independent laboratory, other  
          than the Department of Justice (DOJ), to expedite the analysis  
          of samples.  Specifically,  this bill  :  

          1)Provides that a counties may use remaining share of funds from  
            the state's DNA Identification Fund attributable to the  
            increase in fees as required by the DNA Fingerprint,  
            Unresolved Crime and Innocence Act may be used by a local  
            sheriff, police, district attorney, or regional state crime  
            laboratory for expenditures and administrative costs made or  
            incurred for utilizing an authorized laboratory, other than  
            DOJ's Laboratory, to expedite the analysis of crime scene  
            samples in order to expedite and proceed with a pending  
            criminal action or investigation within that county.

          2)States that the Legislature finds and declares that this bill  
            furthers, and is consistent with, the purpose of the DNA  
            Fingerprint, Unsolved Crime and Innocence Protection Act to  
            enhance the use of DNA identification evidence for the purpose  
            of accurate and expeditious crime solving and for exonerating  
            the innocent by accelerating the testing of DNA samples that  
            cannot be handled in an expeditious manner without the use of  
            an outside laboratory.

           The Senate amendments  :

          1)Specify that the reimbursement for costs may be made for the  
            processing and analysis of forensic identification samples and  
            testimony related to that analysis.

          2)Require authorizations from the county board of supervisors to  








                                                                  AB 2009
                                                                  Page  2

            reimburse local law enforcement for expenditures and  
            administrative costs made or incurred for utilizing the  
            laboratory.

           EXISTING LAW  :

          1)States that except as otherwise provided in this section, for  
            the purpose of implementing the DNA Fingerprint, Unsolved  
            Crime and Innocence Protection Act, there shall be levied an  
            additional penalty of $1 for every $10, or part of $10, in  
            each county upon every fine, penalty, or forfeiture imposed  
            and collected by the courts for all criminal offenses,  
            including all offenses involving a violation of the Vehicle  
            Code or any local ordinance adopted pursuant to the Vehicle  
            Code.  

          2)States that the penalty imposed by this section shall be  
            collected together with and in the same manner as specified  
            sections.  These moneys shall be taken from fines and  
            forfeitures deposited with the county treasurer prior to any  
            divisions as specified.  The board of supervisors shall  
            establish in the county treasury a DNA Identification Fund  
            into which shall be deposited the collected moneys pursuant to  
            this section.  The moneys of the fund shall be allocated.  

          3)States that this additional penalty does not apply to the  
            following:

             a)   Any restitution fine;

             b)   Specified penalties authorized under the Penal Code;

             c)   Specified parking offenses; and,

             d)   The state surcharge authorized by the Penal Code,

          4)Provides that the fund moneys described, together with any  
            interest earned thereon, shall be held by the county treasurer  
            separate from any funds subject to transfer or division  
            pursuant to Penal Code Section 1463.  Deposits to the fund may  
            continue through and including the 20th year after the initial  
            calendar year in which the surcharge is collected, or longer  
            if and as necessary to make payments upon any lease or  
            leaseback arrangement utilized to finance any of the projects  
            specified herein.  








                                                                  AB 2009
                                                                  Page  3


           AS PASSED BY THE ASSEMBLY,  this bill permitted counties to use  
          excess funds from the state's DNA Identification Fund to  
          reimburse law enforcement and district attorneys for use of an  
          independent laboratory, other than DOJ, to expedite the analysis  
          of samples.  

           FISCAL EFFECT  :   None

           COMMENTS  :   According to the author, "The backlog of submittals  
          to the DNA labs is significant.  Unless the case is a  
          high-profile homicide, counties may have to wait over a year for  
          a DNA result.  Private lab work can produce results in two  
          weeks. 

          "Yuba County cites two examples of slow DNA work at the State  
          labs.  First, there was a rape case with an offense date of June  
          6, 2008.  The biological samples were first submitted to DOJ in  
          August of 2008.  The final DNA analysis report was provided to  
          us November 16th, 2009.

          "A second case - a stranger rape - involved a female Beale AFB  
          airman as the victim.  The offense date was January 20, 2008.   
          The biological samples were submitted to DOJ on January 25th,  
          2008.  The final DNA analysis was completed on February 4th,  
          2009.  This was an expedited analysis, with the Yuba County DA  
          office checking with the lab every month, as the victim was  
          scheduled to be deployed to Iraq/Afghanistan.  The County  
          managed to delay the deployment, but doing so strained  
          relationships with the Air Force.  The suspect turned out to be  
          a cable TV installer whose job put him in the homes of cable  
          subscribers.

          "The County would like to make some of the funds generated from  
          Proposition 69 and placed in the County's trust fund available  
          to pay for the costs of DNA analysis and testimony through a  
          private lab.

          "The County is  not trying to impact  funding that goes to the  
          State lab under the  program - and in fact  the Yuba  proposal  
          would not in any way affect the   portion of the monies collected  
          which go to the state.   The proposal   would only free up balances  
          otherwise unusable at the local level.  

          "If statute was changed to allow funds generated under Prop. 69  








                                                                  AB 2009
                                                                  Page  4

          to be used for private labs, case turnaround could be in as  
          little as 2 weeks.  The fund balance in Yuba is growing  
          significantly.  At the end of CY 2005 it was $1,045; CY 2006 was  
          $28,350; CY 2007 was $83,169; and CY 2008 was $148,777.  At the  
          rate the fund balance increases, there will likely be over  
          $200,000 at the end of this calendar year."

          Please see the policy committee for a full discussion of this  
          bill.
           

          Analysis Prepared by  :    Gabriel Caswell / PUB. S. / (916)  
          319-3744 


                                                                FN: 0005183