BILL ANALYSIS
------------------------------------------------------------
|SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | AB 2018|
|Office of Senate Floor Analyses | |
|1020 N Street, Suite 524 | |
|(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | |
|327-4478 | |
------------------------------------------------------------
THIRD READING
Bill No: AB 2018
Author: Skinner (D), et al
Amended: 8/20/10 in Senate
Vote: 21
SENATE HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE : 4-0, 6/22/10
AYES: Liu, Emmerson, Romero, Yee
NO VOTE RECORDED: Runner
SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE : 8-0, 8/2/10
AYES: Kehoe, Alquist, Ashburn, Corbett, Emmerson, Price,
Wolk, Yee
NO VOTE RECORDED: Leno, Walters, Wyland
ASSEMBLY FLOOR : 62-1, 5/24/10 - See last page for vote
SUBJECT : Food stamps: intercounty transfer of benefits
SOURCE : County Welfare Directors Association
DIGEST : This bill establishes an intercounty transfer
process for food stamp recipients who move from one county
to another.
Senate Floor Amendments of 8/20/10 conform the language of
AB 2018 to that of a pending budget trailer bill.
ANALYSIS :
Existing law:
CONTINUED
AB 2018
Page
2
1. Establishes the federal supplemental nutritional
assistance program (SNAP), popularly known as the food
stamp program, to provide eligible households with an
electronic benefit for the purchase of food.
2. Establishes the welfare-to-work program, California Work
Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids (CalWORKs), for
eligible families with children.
3. Establishes the Medi-Cal program to provide health care
coverage to eligible adults and children.
4. Provides for the intercounty transfer of benefits for
participants in CalWORKs and Medi-Cal who move from one
county to another within California.
This bill:
1. Requires the Department of Social Services (DSS) to
establish a process of inter-county transfer of
eligibility for benefits under the food stamp program
when a recipient moves from one county to another within
the state.
2. Specifies that, commencing no later than April 1, 2011,
that for recipients of food stamp benefits who are also
participants in the CalWORKs program, the inter-county
transfer process utilized for CalWORKs shall be used;
and further specifies that, commencing no later than
July 1, 2011, for recipients of food stamp benefits who
are also recipients of Medi-Cal benefits, but not
recipients of CalWORKs, the inter-county transfer
process utilized for Medi-Cal shall be used.
3. Requires that, commencing no later than July 1, 2011,
that for recipients of food stamp benefits who are
neither recipients of CalWORKs nor Medi-Cal benefits, an
inter-county transfer process shall be developed, as
specified.
4. Specifies that, upon implementation of the intercounty
transfer procedures set forth in this bill, it is the
responsibility of the recipient changing residence from
CONTINUED
AB 2018
Page
3
one county to another within the state to notify the
county currently paying food stamp benefits of the move.
5. Requires the recipient's prior county of residence to
notify the new county of residence of the recipient's
move as soon as the recipient's location in the new
county is known, and requires the new county of
residence to be responsible for determining the
recipient's continued eligibility for food stamp
benefits, until the next scheduled recertification or
other regularly scheduled interview.
6. Requires DSS to adopt regulations to implement the bill
no later than July 1, 2012.
Background
Currently, if a family on CalWORKs or Medi-Cal moves from
one county to another, their case follows them to the new
county without a requirement to re-apply for benefits.
These processes ensure that families are not left without
resources during times of transition. Meanwhile, state law
requires a household to reapply for food stamp benefits
when moving from one county to another, leaving many
without benefits while they wait for approval in the new
county. This requirement not only results in lost benefits
to vulnerable families, but in lost economic activity.
Indeed, the United States Department of Agriculture
estimates that for every $1 in food stamp benefits, $1.84
in economic activity is generated. Moreover, it is costly
and time-consuming process for counties to re-process the
application.
FISCAL EFFECT : Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: Yes
Local: Yes
According to the Senate Appropriations Committee:
Fiscal Impact (in thousands)
Major Provisions 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 Fund
New inter-county transfer Minor county workload
savings Local
CONTINUED
AB 2018
Page
4
process
Elminates new interviews Potentially significant
workload savings Local/
General/
Federal
SUPPORT : (Verified 8/20/10)
County Welfare Directors Association (source)
California State Association of Counties
Western Center on Law and Poverty
ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT : The County Welfare Directors
Association, the bill's sponsor, states that "As many
Californians are being forced to move across county lines
to find work, requiring them to resubmit paperwork again
and again to keep their benefits is inefficient and
increases the chances of these families losing their
benefits for which they remain otherwise eligible. Further
it is not required by federal law."
ASSEMBLY FLOOR :
AYES: Adams, Ammiano, Arambula, Beall, Bill Berryhill, Tom
Berryhill, Blakeslee, Block, Blumenfield, Bradford,
Brownley, Buchanan, Caballero, Charles Calderon, Carter,
Chesbro, Conway, Cook, Coto, Davis, De La Torre, De Leon,
Emmerson, Eng, Feuer, Fletcher, Fong, Fuentes, Fuller,
Furutani, Gaines, Galgiani, Harkey, Hayashi, Hill, Huber,
Huffman, Jeffries, Jones, Lieu, Bonnie Lowenthal, Ma,
Mendoza, Monning, Nestande, Niello, Nielsen, V. Manuel
Perez, Portantino, Ruskin, Salas, Skinner, Smyth,
Solorio, Audra Strickland, Swanson, Torlakson, Torres,
Torrico, Tran, Yamada, John A. Perez
NOES: Anderson
NO VOTE RECORDED: Bass, DeVore, Evans, Garrick, Gilmore,
Hagman, Hall, Hernandez, Knight, Logue, Miller, Nava,
Norby, Saldana, Silva, Villines, Vacancy
CONTINUED
AB 2018
Page
5
CTW:mw 8/23/10 Senate Floor Analyses
SUPPORT/OPPOSITION: SEE ABOVE
**** END ****
CONTINUED