BILL ANALYSIS
AB 2021
Page 1
Date of Hearing: April 20, 2010
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON HIGHER EDUCATION
Marty Block, Chair
AB 2021 (Fletcher) - As Amended: March 24, 2010
SUBJECT : Fire protection: Designated Campus Fire Marshal.
SUMMARY : Allows the State Fire Marshal (SFM) to enforce the
building standards and other regulations on all University of
California (UC) campuses and properties, or delegate those
duties to a Designated Campus Fire Marshall (DCFM).
EXISTING LAW requires the SFM and his/her designated
representatives to enforce regulations and building standards
relating to fire and life safety.
FISCAL EFFECT : Unknown
COMMENTS : Double-Referral : This bill was double-referred to
the Assembly Governmental Organization Committee, which heard
and approved this bill on April 12, 2010.
Purpose of this bill : According to the author, this bill is
intended to codify a 16-year-old Memorandum of Understanding
(MOU) between UC and SFM, giving authorization to SFM to allow
DCFMs to enforce fire safety standards at UC facilities.
Background : According to UC, the current MOU with SFM allows
qualified DCFMs to act on behalf of SFM to ensure compliance
with fire and life safety standards at UC facilities. An MOU
was first initiated as a two-year pilot program in 1994 to
determine the effectiveness of this practice. The program
proved to be an acceptable means of ensuring on-site fire plan
approval for UC construction projects and existing UC campus
facilities.
Under the MOU, campuses submit projects to the DCFM in lieu of
submittals to SFM. This allows for faster and more thorough
reviews of UC's large and complex capital program. DCFMs
interact with SFM to ensure UC compliance with all applicable
codes and standards, and assist planners, architects, and
engineers in identifying alternative fire safety solutions.
According to the author, UC has attempted to renew the existing
AB 2021
Page 2
MOU with SFM. However, the current Acting SFM has voiced a
concern about the relationship between SFM and UC not being
codified in state statute. UC believes that unless the existing
relationship between SFM and UC is codified in state statute,
the Acting SMF will no longer allow the relationship under the
MOU. UC believes that ending the relationship outlined in the
MOU will place additional burdens on SFM and reduce the
oversight quality that is provided by DCFMs.
REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION :
Support
University of California (sponsor)
Opposition
None on File
Analysis Prepared by : Laura Metune / HIGHER ED. / (916)
319-3960