BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 2032
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   April 21, 2010

                     ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT
                                Sandre Swanson, Chair
                 AB 2032 (Davis) - As Introduced:  February 17, 2010
           
          SUBJECT  :   Employment of minors: entertainment work permits.

           SUMMARY  :   Requires applicants for an Entertainment Work Permit  
          (EWP) for minors to pay a $50 dollar fee, and directs the Labor  
          Commissioner (LC) to collect and deposit the money into a  
          special fund in the State Treasury for their use to administer  
          and enforce EWPs for minors, as provided.  Specifically,  this  
          bill  :  

          1)Requires that an applicant for an EWP pursuant to Section  
            11753 of Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations to  
            submit to the LC an application and an application fee, which  
            shall be fifty dollars ($50), until January 1, 2012, after  
            which time the fee shall be set by the LC, but shall not  
            exceed fifty dollars ($50).   

          2)Creates an EWP Fund in the State Treasury.

          3)Directs the LC to deposit the fee collected, as specified,  
            into the EWP Fund. 

          4)Provides that, revenue in the EWP Fund shall be available to  
            the LC, upon appropriation by the Legislature, to pay for:

             a)   Issuing EWPs.  

             b)   Enforcing the provisions of Labor Code Section 1308.5,  
               including making at least one unannounced site visit per  
               quarter to a randomly selected set or production facility  
               where one or more minors are working under EWPs.   

             c)   Administering the EWP program, including developing and  
               enhancing an Internet Web site, developing and updating  
               informational materials, and providing training to studio  
               teachers regarding their role in enforcing the requirements  
               of Labor Code Section 1308.5 and the regulations adopted  
               pursuant thereto.    

           EXISTING LAW  : 








                                                                  AB 2032
                                                                  Page  2


          1)Requires the written consent of the LC for the employment of a  
            minor in the entertainment industry, as specified. (Labor Code  
            section 1308.5)

          2)Requires an entertainment work permit to be obtained from the  
            LC for a minor in order for them to be employed in the  
            entertainment industry.

          3)Provides that once written consent is given by the LC, as  
            specified, that consent shall be void after the expiration of  
            ten business days from the date the written consent was  
            granted unless it is attached to a true and correct copy as  
            evidence that a "Coogan Trust Account" has been established on  
            behalf of the minor.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :   Unknown

           COMMENTS  :   The author states, that during the budget  
          negotiations last year, a proposal came forward to eliminate the  
          role the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement (DLSE) plays in  
          issuing EWPs for minors, as a cost saving measure.  It was  
          thought that simply having a work permit, which are currently  
          issued by school officials, was sufficient protection for our  
          children working in the field of entertainment.  While looking  
          into the issue of work permits for minors in the entertainment  
          field, the author contends that it became clear that what we  
          needed are more protections for our working children, not less. 

          The author believes one of the most important protections we  
          provide for our working children is protection of their assets  
          from misuse, through a provision in law known as the Coogan Act.  
           This Act is named after the famous actor, Jackie Coogan, whose  
          mother and stepfather squandered over four million dollars he  
          earned as a child television and movie star in the 1930's.  

          While current law requires the DLSE to issue applicants a EWP  
          upon presentment of proof of school attendance, adequate grades  
          and health records, in order for the permit to be accepted by an  
          employer as valid, the EWP must have proof that a Coogan Account  
          exists for that child attached to it.  Without the Coogan  
          Account, the permit expires in ten days.  Surprisingly, no one  
          from the state of California ever follows up on this  
          requirement.  The entire state plan for protecting the welfare  
          of California's working child performers is delegated to the  








                                                                  AB 2032
                                                                  Page  3

          employers.  While the author believes the Studio Teachers are  
          persons of integrity and great value, this situation places them  
          in a situation that appears to be a conflict of interest.  The  
          state should provide minimal oversight at the least, in order to  
          adequately protect our working children and prevent undue  
          pressure on the Studio Teachers to be "production friendly." 

          Under the current statutory scheme, DLSE is supposed to help  
          enforce this important protection, by mandating that a person  
          must wait six months before the DLSE will issue another EWP.   
          However, there is not any method established in the DLSE for  
          tracking permits once issued.  

          The author argues this bill will remedy this situation, by  
          requiring that DLSE establish a method for tracking EWP's once  
          issued.  This will prevent venue shopping by persons who have  
          already received a ten-day work permit hoping to avoid opening  
          up a Coogan Trust Account.  This bill will also have a provision  
          to require DLSE to make unannounced visits to the workplace of  
          child performers, in order to ascertain whether the performer's  
          paperwork is in order - adding a second level of protection.   
          Finally, the author states, AB 2032 will provide a funding  
          stream to offset the costs of these protections, by adding a  
          minimal fee to the application for EWP, as other states have  
          already done.  He points out that the fee is tax deductible.

           A similar bill, AB 402 (Davis) was vetoed last year; the author  
          responds  :  The Governor vetoed AB 402 (Davis), which was similar  
          to this bill, saying, 

            "There have been previous proposals to move issuance of EWPs  
            to the local school districts which already issue work  
            permits.  Rather than creating a new fee and duties for the  
            Department of Industrial Relations, it is important to  
            administer this program in the most efficient manner by  
            transferring this function to the schools."  

          In response, the author offers his opinion that this bill does  
          not create new duties, as the DIR is already responsible for  
          issuing EWPs, and is already responsible for child worker safety  
          in the work place. "AB 2032 simply provides DIR with a funding  
          stream to do the work they are charged with under current law."   
          The author also questions how schools can issue work permits to  
          preschool age children, as actors begin their careers literally  
          at birth; or whether overburdened schools are best suited to  








                                                                  AB 2032
                                                                  Page  4

          issue EWPs to those child actors who attend Charter schools,  
          private schools, home schools, or reside in other states.   
          Finally, the author states that he is working with the  
          Governor's staff to address any lingering concerns they may  
          have. 

          The Screen Actors Guild, who supports this bill, believes under  
          the current structure there is an inadequate system to monitor  
          and track the work permits issued to minors in the entertainment  
                     industry.  They state that by creating a "Work Permit  
          Fund" to enforce regulations that protect the young actors the  
          bill will be creating a safer more secure work environment.

          For more detailed background information refer to the Assembly  
          Arts, Entertainment, Sports, Tourism & Internet Media policy  
          committee analysis.

           PRIOR LEGISLATION  :

          AB 402 (Davis) of 2009, similar to this bill, would have  
          required a $50 fee be submitted at the time when a minor applies  
          for an Entertainment Work Permit (EWP) and directed the LC to  
          collect and deposit the money into a special fund for the  
          administration and enforcement of            EWPs for minors, as  
          provided.  AB 402 was vetoed by the Governor.

          SB 210 (Burton) Chapter 667, Statutes of 2004, added the  
          requirement that the LC's written consent for performances of a  
          minor under Labor Code Section 1308.5 be limited to ten days,  
          unless a Coogan Trust Account has been established.

          SB 1162 (Burton) Chapter 940, Statutes of 1999, overhauled the  
          Coogan Act.  Applicable to both court-approved and  
          non-court-approved minors' contracts for creative or artistic   
          employment, SB 1162 requires 15% of a minor's earnings to be set  
          aside and deposited into a "Coogan Trust Account", invested in  
          low-risk financial vehicles, and blocked from use until the  
          minor is emancipated or reaches age 18.  To enforce the  
          set-aside, SB 1162 imposes a duty on the employer to make the  
          deposit directly into the minor's Coogan Trust Account, which a  
          parent or guardian is required to open at an insured financial  
          institution and to invest in a manner consistent with that of a  
          trustee.  Annual accounting is required, and court supervision  
          of trust accounts for minors with court-approved contracts  
          continues until the minor turns 18.








                                                                  AB 2032
                                                                  Page  5

           
          REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :   

           Support 
           
          Screen Actors Guild

           Opposition 
           
          None on file.
           
          Analysis Prepared by  :    Lorie Erickson / L. & E. / (916)  
          319-2091