BILL ANALYSIS
AB 2060
Page 1
Date of Hearing: May 28, 2010
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Felipe Fuentes, Chair
AB 2060 (Calderon) - As Amended: May 18, 2010
Policy Committee: Revenue and
Taxation Vote: 9-0
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
No Reimbursable:
SUMMARY
This bill exempts certain sales related to fixed price contracts
from future sales tax rate increases. Specifically, the bill:
1)Applies to fixed-price contracts signed before the operative
date of the rate increase involving the sale or lease of
tangible property.
2)Applies to all fixed-price contacts involving sales to
governmental agencies, or to contracts between private
entities when the seller is a small business (defined as a
business with gross receipts of less than $1 million and net
income of less the $250,000).
FISCAL EFFECT
1)No direct or immediate effect since the bill would apply only
to future sales tax increases.
2)However, if the state were to raise the sales tax in a future
year and the enacting legislation did not have a general
exemption for fixed price contracts, this bill could result in
revenue reductions potentially exceeding $2 million.
COMMENTS
1)Rationale . This bill is co-sponsored by several contractors
associations, for the purpose of protecting contractors with
fixed price contracts from bearing the cost of a sales and use
tax rate increase that cannot be passed on to their
customers.
AB 2060
Page 2
2)Background . Existing law imposes a sales tax on transactions
involving tangible personal property. The sales tax is
collected by the seller at the time of the transaction and
remitted to the Board of Equalization. Historically,
legislation enacting sales tax increases has contained
provisions that exempt fixed price contracts that had been
entered into prior to the effective date of the legislation
from the rate increase. However, the legislation enacting the
1% sales and use tax increase beginning in April 2009 did not
include this exemption. Due to the nature of a fixed price
contract, the contractor may not pass the increase on to the
customer, and must bear the full out-of-pocket cost of the
rate increase. This became an issue last year with respect to
fixed price contracts that CalTrans had awarded for the Bay
Bridge
3)Related legislation . AB 1523 (Calderon), of the current
Legislative Session, would have relieved parties who entered
into a fixed price contract or a fixed price lease before the
recently enacted 1% SUT increase. AB 1523 was held in the
Assembly Appropriations Committee.
Analysis Prepared by : Brad Williams / APPR. / (916) 319-2081