BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                  AB 2076|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AB 2076
          Author:   Salas (D)
          Amended:  6/23/10 in Senate
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE BUSINESS, PROF. & ECON. DEV. COMMITTEE  :  5-1,  
            6/21/10
          AYES:  Negrete McLeod, Calderon, Correa, Florez, Yee
          NOES:  Aanestad
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Wyland, Oropeza, Walters
           
          SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  Senate Rule 28.8

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  71-5, 5/13/10 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Advertising:  business location  
          representations:  floral and 
                      ornamental products and services

           SOURCE  :     California State Floral Association


           DIGEST  :    This bill makes it unlawful for a provider or  
          vendor of floral or ornamental products or services, as  
          defined, to misrepresent the geographic location of its  
          business, as specified.

           ANALYSIS  :    

          Existing law, the Business and Professions Code:

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               AB 2076
                                                                Page  
          2

          1. Regulates advertising, generally, and makes it unlawful  
             for any person, firm, corporation or association, or any  
             employee to make any statement in any advertising which  
             is untrue or misleading, and which is known or, in the  
             exercise of reasonable care, should be known to be  
             untrue or misleading.

          2. Provides that unfair competition includes any unlawful,  
             unfair or fraudulent business act or practice and  
             unfair, deceptive, untrue or misleading advertising and  
             other prohibited acts, as specified.

          Existing law, the Civil Code, provides, among other things,  
          that using deceptive representations or designations of  
          geographical origin in connection with goods or services in  
          a consumer transaction and misrepresenting the source,  
          sponsorship, approval, or certification of goods and  
          services are unlawful as unfair methods of competition and  
          unfair or deceptive acts or practices.

          This bill:

          1. Makes it unlawful for a provider or vendor of floral or  
             ornamental products or services to misrepresent the  
             geographic location of its business by either:

             A.    Listing a local telephone number in any  
                advertisement or listing unless the advertisement or  
                listing identifies the true physical address,  
                including the city and state of the provider's or  
                vendor's business.

             B.    Listing a fictitious business name or an assumed  
                business name in any advertisement or listing if both  
                of the following are met:

                (1)      The name of the business misrepresents the  
                   provider's or vendor's geographic location.

                (2)      The advertisement or listing does not  
                   identify the true physical address, including the  
                   city and state, of the provider's or vendor's  
                   business.
                      

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               AB 2076
                                                                Page  
          3

          2. States that this bill does not create or impose any duty  
             or obligation on a person other than a vendor or  
             provider, as specified.

          3. Defines the following terms for purposes of the  
             provisions above:

             A.    "Floral or ornamental products or services" to  
                mean floral arrangements, cut flowers, bouquets,  
                potted plants, balloons, floral designs, and related  
                products and services.

             B.    "Local telephone number" to mean a specific  
                telephone number (area code and prefix) assigned for  
                the purpose of completing local calls between a  
                calling party or station and any other party or  
                station within a designated exchange or all of its  
                designated local calling areas.  The term would not  
                include long distance telephone numbers or 800, 888,  
                or 900 exchange telephone numbers listed in a local  
                telephone directory.

           Background  

           Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Consumer Alert  .  In April  
          1998, the FTC issued a consumer alert regarding absentee,  
          "long-distance" florists that mislead consumers into  
          believing they are local florists but are not:
          
            Flowers are a great way to celebrate a birthday, cheer up  
            a sick friend, or simply brighten someone's day.  Your  
            local florist is just a phone call away, or so you think.  
             Some unscrupulous telemarketing firms are posing as  
            local florists, charging you higher fees and taking  
            business away from legitimate florists in your town.
            
            Here's how the deception works:  A telemarketer takes out  
            a bogus listing in the white pages of your telephone  
            directory.  The company may use your town's name in its  
            own to make you believe it's local.  Or, name of a  
            legitimate local florist may be listed with a different  
            local phone number. 

            When you call, you're unknowingly forwarded to an  

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               AB 2076
                                                                Page  
          4

            out-of-town telemarketing operation.  The telemarketer  
            takes your order and credit card information for payment,  
            and forwards your order to an area florist.  The  
            telemarketer pockets a processing fee and usually a  
            percentage of the sale as well.  You don't realize you've  
            been scammed until you get higher than expected charges  
            from an out-of-town company on your credit card  
            statement, or learn that the flowers weren't delivered as  
            ordered, or were never delivered at all.

          Following the FTC's consumer alert, Congress adopted a  
          concurrent resolution resolving that the FTC should  
          exercise its broad authority "to investigate businesses  
          that are engaging in the deceptive advertising practice of  
          misrepresenting their geographic location in telephone  
          listings, Internet advertisements, and other advertising  
          media" (H. Con. Res. 318, 105th Congress, 2d Session,  
          August 1998).
          
           23 other states have enacted similar laws  .  The bill's  
          sponsor writes that 23 states have enacted legislation  
          similar to this measure to prohibit deceptive telephone  
          listings by absentee florists, including Arizona,  
          Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa,  
          Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Michigan, New Hampshire, New  
          Jersey, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South  
          Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and Washington.

           Prior Legislation
          
           This bill is the fourth bill introduced in the last 11  
          years on this same issue.  Each of the bills were  
          substantially the same.  Each bill was vetoed by the  
          Governor.  In vetoing the latest bill, AB 1282 (Salas) in  
          2007, the Governor stated in part, "In today's global  
          economy, it is unreasonable to limit out-of-area businesses  
          from using local names and telephone numbers.  In virtually  
          every aspect of the economy, consumers are accustomed to  
          purchasing products from around the world via many  
          methods."  It is unclear how the sponsor and author will  
          address the Governor's veto message.  

          AB 1282 (Salas), 2007-08 Session, a nearly identical  
          measure, which was vetoed by Governor Schwarzenegger.

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               AB 2076
                                                                Page  
          5


          AB 1074 (Nakano), 2001-02 Session, also a substantially  
          similar bill, was vetoed by Governor Davis, who noted the  
          same concerns as Governor Schwarzenegger did in his veto of  
          AB 1282 (Salas).

          AB 1375 (House), 1999-2000 Session, a similar measure, was  
          also vetoed by Governor Davis.
          
           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  Yes

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  8/4/10)

          California State Floral Association (source)


           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    This bill is sponsored by the  
          California State Floral Association in order to prohibit  
          floral vendors from misrepresenting their business location  
          by adopting fictitious local names and telephone numbers  
          for advertising purposes or by omitting the true physical  
          address of their business in telephone listings.  The  
          sponsor states that the bill seeks to increase consumer  
          awareness, support economic activity in local communities,  
          improve sales tax collection and help encourage job  
          retention and growth within California's floral industry.

          The author states the following need for the bill:

            "California floral shops are often locally owned  
            community based businesses that rely on localized  
            marketing to attract business.  They often use local  
            names consistent with the communities they serve such as  
            'Lodi Florists.'  Flower buyers are unique as well.  They  
            often call remotely and order and establish an amount  
            they are willing to spend or they order a set item (i.e.  
            'Please give me a bouquet for $50' or 'I would like a  
            dozen roses') purchased sight unseen.  The local flower  
            shop has advertised and promoted and their business is  
            relying on trust and quality because often the purchase  
            is sight unseen.  

            "Out of state call centers are taking advantage of this  

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               AB 2076
                                                                Page  
          6

            business model to the detriment of California consumers  
            and local floral shops by advertising as a "local" shop,  
            often using similar names as the locally established shop  
            and piggybacking on their advertising and community  
            relationships (i.e. A New Jersey based company  
            advertising as "Lodi Floral and Gift") with no local  
            presence except an ad in the phone book and an internet  
            website with a local phone number.  Originally, this  
            phenomena was occurring in telephone advertising only but  
            has now spread to the internet.  The result is consumers  
            believe they are buying from their local shop and  
            receiving $50 worth of flowers, when they are actually  
            purchasing from a New Jersey based call center for $50,  
            the call center takes a cut, the wire service takes a cut  
            and the consumer gets $30 worth of flowers.  

            "To add insult to injury, often dissatisfied customers  
            come into the local community based shop and complain  
            about the poor quality or skimpy order because they  
            thought they purchased from 'Lodi Florists.'  The local  
            florist has to handle an unsatisfied customer and not  
            even get the benefit of the sale.  This bill establishes  
            a simple compliance requirement that any floral retailer  
            that uses a local phone number provide address in the  
            advertisement."


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :
          AYES:  Adams, Ammiano, Arambula, Bass, Beall, Bill  
            Berryhill, Tom Berryhill, Blakeslee, Block, Blumenfield,  
            Bradford, Brownley, Buchanan, Caballero, Charles  
            Calderon, Carter, Chesbro, Conway, Cook, Coto, Davis, De  
            La Torre, De Leon, Emmerson, Eng, Evans, Feuer, Fletcher,  
            Fong, Fuentes, Fuller, Furutani, Galgiani, Garrick,  
            Gilmore, Hall, Harkey, Hayashi, Hernandez, Hill, Huber,  
            Huffman, Jones, Knight, Lieu, Logue, Bonnie Lowenthal,  
            Ma, Mendoza, Miller, Monning, Nava, Nestande, Niello,  
            Nielsen, V. Manuel Perez, Portantino, Ruskin, Salas,  
            Saldana, Silva, Solorio, Audra Strickland, Swanson,  
            Torlakson, Torres, Torrico, Tran, Villines, Yamada, John  
            A. Perez
          NOES:  Anderson, DeVore, Gaines, Jeffries, Smyth
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Hagman, Norby, Skinner, Vacancy


                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               AB 2076
                                                                Page  
          7


          JJA:mw  8/4/10   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****







































                                                           CONTINUED