BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    






               SENATE COMMITTEE ON ELECTIONS, REAPPORTIONMENT AND  
                           CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS
                          Senator Loni Hancock, Chair


          BILL NO:   AB 2088                             HEARING  
          DATE: 6/15/10
          AUTHOR:    ADAMS                               ANALYSIS BY:  
             Darren Chesin
          AMENDED:   4/26/10 
          FISCAL:    NO
          
                                     SUBJECT
           
          Recall elections

                                   DESCRIPTION  
          
           Existing law  provides that if a vacancy occurs in an office  
          after a recall petition is filed against the vacating  
          officer, the recall election shall nevertheless proceed.   
          The vacancy will be filled as provided by law but any  
          person appointed to fill the vacancy will hold office only  
          until a successor is elected per the recall election. 
           
          This bill  establishes a process for filling a vacancy in an  
          office that occurs after a recall petition has been filed  
          against the vacating officer. Specifically, this bill:

           Requires elections officials to immediately verify the  
            signatures on the recall petition that have been  
            submitted as of the date of the vacancy and if a  
            sufficient number of signatures have been filed for the  
            recall to qualify as of the date of the vacancy, the  
            recall election shall proceed.

           Provides that if an insufficient number of signatures or  
            no signatures were filed for the recall to qualify as the  
            date of the vacancy, the recall shall not proceed and the  
            vacancy shall be filled as otherwise provided by current  
            law.

           Provides that a person who is the subject of a recall  
            petition may not be appointed to fill the vacancy in the  
            office that he or she vacated nor shall that person be  
            appointed to fill any other vacancy in office on the same  









            governing board for the duration of the term of office of  
            the seat that he or she vacated.

           Existing law  provides that for the recall of a state  
          officer, if fewer than 500 signatures for a recall petition  
          are submitted to the county elections official, he or she  
          shall count the number of signatures and submit those  
          results to the Secretary of State (SOS).  If 500 or more  
          signatures are submitted, the elections official may  
          verify, using a random sampling technique, either 3 percent  
          of the signatures submitted, or 500, whichever is  less  .

           This bill  instead provides that for the recall of a state  
          officer, if more than 500 signatures are submitted for a  
          recall petition, the elections official may verify, using a  
          random sampling technique, either 3 percent of the  
          signatures submitted, or 500, whichever is  greater  .

                                    BACKGROUND  
          
           Less Than Total Recalls  ?  According to the SOS, the  
          question of how current law would be interpreted regarding  
          the timing of a vacancy in an office subject to a recall  
          was raised several times during recall efforts last year.   
          Specifically, concern was raised over "musical chairs"  
          gamesmanship where someone might resign to avoid a recall  
          moving forward then get appointed to another vacancy on the  
          same governing body.  

          Random Thoughts  .  For the recall of a local officer, the  
          random sampling of petition signatures must include an  
          examination of at least 500 or 5 percent of the signatures,  
          whichever is  greater  .  This is inconsistent with the method  
          by which the random sample is conducted for the recall of a  
          state official.  This bill would make the conduct of the  
          random sample for a state officer's recall more consistent  
          with the process in place for local recalls.

                                     COMMENTS  
          
           1.According to the author  , AB 2088 clarifies the recall  
            process in the event an elected official subject to a  
            recall resigns during the process.  Current law provides  
            that if an elected official resigns after a recall  
          AB 2088 (ADAMS)                                        Page  
          2  
           








            petition is filed with the county elections official, the  
            entire recall process, including the requirement that an  
            election be held, must proceed. In addition, there is a  
            conflict in statute regarding how the random sampling of  
            signatures used to qualify a recall for the ballot must  
            be conducted.  

          AB 2088 addresses this conflict and clarifies the process  
            to be followed when the elected official resigns after  
            recall petitions have been filed with a county elections  
            office.  AB 2088 also eliminates a conflicting statute  
            regarding the random sampling of signatures that must be  
            verified to qualify a recall election for the ballot.

                                   PRIOR ACTION
           
          Assembly Elections and Redistricting Committee:  7-0
          Assembly Floor:                         76-0
                                         
                                   POSITIONS  

          Sponsor: Secretary of State

           Support: None received

           Oppose:  None received
















          AB 2088 (ADAMS)                                        Page  
          3