BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                AB 2147
                                                                Page  1


        ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
        AB 2147 (V. Manuel Perez)
        As Amended  April 19, 2010
        Majority vote 

         TRANSPORTATION      11-1        APPROPRIATIONS      12-2         
         
         ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
        |Ayes:|Bonnie Lowenthal,         |Ayes:|Fuentes, Conway, Ammiano, |
        |     |Jeffries,                 |     |Coto, Davis, Bonnie       |
        |     |Bill Berryhill,           |     |Lowenthal, Hall, Nielsen, |
        |     |Blumenfield, Buchanan,    |     |Skinner, Solorio,         |
        |     |Eng, Furutani, Galgiani,  |     |Torlakson, Hill           |
        |     |Hayashi, Miller, Solorio  |     |                          |
        |     |                          |     |                          |
        |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
        |Nays:|Niello                    |Nays:|Harkey, Miller            |
        |     |                          |     |                          |
         ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
         SUMMARY  :  Modifies the Safe Routes to School (SR2S) program to result  
        in increased participation from socio-economically disadvantaged  
        schools and communities.  Specifically,  this bill  :  

        1)Makes legislative findings and declarations regarding the SR2S  
          program and its benefits and about the efforts of the  
          Administration to adapt the program so that there is increased  
          participation in it from socio-economically disadvantaged schools  
          and communities.  

        2)Expands the list of factors to be used to rate SR2 grant proposals  
          to include the use of a public participation process, including but  
          not limited to, a public meeting that satisfies the following:  

           a)   Involves the public, schools, parents, teachers, local  
             agencies, the business community, key professionals, and others;

           b)   Identifies community priorities and gathers community input  
             to guide the development of projects;

           c)   Ensures that community priorities are reflected in proposals;  
             and, 

           d)   Secures support for the project by relevant community  
             stakeholders.  








                                                                AB 2147
                                                                Page  2



        3)Further expands the list of proposal rating factors to include  
          benefits to a "disadvantaged community," as defined to mean a  
          community with an annual median household income that is less than  
          80% of the statewide annual median household income.  

         EXISTING LAW  :  

        4)Provides two separate and distinct Safe Routes to School  
          programs-one federally funded and one state funded.  The federal  
          program provides grants for infrastructure and non-infrastructure  
          projects (such as education and enforcement).  The state program  
          provides grants only for infrastructure projects.  (This bill  
          modifies the evaluation criteria for state SR2S grants; hence, any  
          further reference to the "SR2S" program will be to the state  
          program.)  

        5)Requires the Department of Transportation (Caltrans) to administer  
          an SR2S construction program for construction of bicycle and  
          pedestrian safety and traffic calming projects.  

        6)Requires Caltrans to award grants to local governmental agencies on  
          a statewide, competitive basis using the following factors:  

           a)   Demonstrated needs of the applicant;  

           b)   Potential of the proposal for reducing child injuries and  
             fatalities;  

           c)   Potential of the proposal for encouraging increased walking  
             and bicycling among students;  

           d)   Identification of safety hazards;  

           e)   Identification of current and potential walking and bicycling  
             routes to school; and,

           f)   Consultation and support for projects by school-based  
             associations, local traffic engineers, local elected officials,  
             law enforcement agencies, school officials, and other relevant  
             community stakeholders.  

        7)Encourages Caltrans to coordinate with law enforcement agencies'  
          community policy efforts in establishing and maintaining the SR2S  








                                                                AB 2147
                                                                Page  3


          program.  

        8)Exempts SR2S grants from traditional transportation distribution  
          formulae, commonly referred to as the north-south split and county  
          shares.  

         FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to Assembly Appropriations, minor  
        absorbable costs for Caltrans to incorporate the additional factors  
        into its ranking methodology for SR2S applications.  

         COMMENTS  :  The goal of both Safe Routes to School programs  
        administered by Caltrans is to increase the number of children that  
        walk or bicycle to school by funding projects that remove barriers  
        that prevent or discourage them from doing so.  In 1999, California  
        was the first state in the country to legislate its own SR2S program  
        with dedicated funding (from the State Highway Account) on the  
        premise that encouraging more children to walk and bicycle to school  
        would result in healthier children, improved air quality, reduced  
        fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions, and less traffic  
        congestion near schools.  The state SR2S program was funded at $48.5  
        million in the latest annual cycle (August 2009) and funds are  
        distributed on a statewide, competitive basis.  Typical projects in  
        these programs include installing curbs, sidewalks, traffic signals,  
        crosswalks, warning signs, and bicycle paths.  

        According to guidelines that govern Caltrans administration of the  
        SR2S:  

        1)An applicant for SR2S grants must be an incorporated city or a  
          county within California.  

        2)SR2S funds are apportioned to each of 12 Caltrans districts on a  
          student enrollment basis, except that 3 rural, low-student  
          enrollment districts receive $1 million each for each two-year  
          cycle.  Those districts are:  Caltrans District 1 (Eureka),  
          Caltrans District 2 (Redding), and Caltrans District 9 (Bishop).  

        3)The maximum amount of SR2S funds allocated to any single project is  
          $900,000 and the maximum reimbursement rate allowed for each  
          project is 90%, with the remaining 10% to be matched in local  
          dollars.  If the total project cost exceeds $1 million, the  
          applicant must fund the balance of the project with other funds.  

        4)Applicants are advised, but not prohibited, from submitting more  








                                                                AB 2147
                                                                Page  4


          than three project applications.  

        The SR2S program has been hugely successful, with applications  
        exceeding available funds by a ratio of about 6:1.  Further, many  
        perceive the program's outcomes as being equally successful in  
        encouraging children to be more physically active, and SR2S is  
        considered a critical program in the fight against childhood obesity.  
         

        With this in mind, Caltrans recently announced efforts underway,  
        along with the California Department of Public Health, the California  
        Department of Education, the Safe Routes to School National  
        Partnership, PolicyLink, and the California Rural Legal Assistance  
        Foundation, to review and analyze SR2S funding practices to assess  
        participation of low-socioeconomic status schools and communities.  A  
        primary reason for this emphasis is that the epidemic of childhood  
        obesity is especially prevalent in low-income communities where 30%  
        of children and youth are overweight.  The review of funding  
        practices is scheduled to be completed by July 1, 2010, and is  
        expected to:  

        1)Determine the socioeconomic status of current and past SR2S  
          participants and determine the appropriate level of participation  
          among these schools and communities.

        2)Identify funding practices in other programs that have been  
          effective in securing high participation levels from  
          low-socioeconomic status schools.  Some practices to be reviewed  
          include:

           a)   Preferential or "priority points" for projects in  
             low-socioeconomic status schools;  

           b)   Planning grants for communities to help them prepare  
             successful applications; and, 

           c)   Guidelines, trainining, or other capacity-building stratagies  
             to help disadvantaged communities compete more effectively for  
             funding.  

        In addition to this review of funding practices, Caltrans and its  
        partners have created the Safe Routes to School Technical Assistance  
        Resources Center to help communities apply for and implement SR2S  
        grants.  








                                                                AB 2147
                                                                Page  5



        According to the author, AB 2147 is intended to ensure disadvantaged  
        communities receive equitable access to SR2S funds by requiring  
        Caltrans to give priority to proposals that benefit these communities  
        and provide community residents with a stronger role in development  
        of SR2S project proposals.  

        Previous legislation:  AB 1475 (Soto), Chapter 663, Statutes of 1999  
        established the first Safe Route to School Program, on a limited-term  
        basis.  The program was extended twice:  SB 10 (Soto), Chapter 600,  
        Statutes of 200, and SB 1087 (Soto), Chapter 392, Statutes of 2004.   
        These provisions were finally amended to strike the sunset date and  
        continue the program indefinitely (AB 57 (Soto), Chapter 673,  
        Statutes of 2007).  

         
        Analysis Prepared by  :   Janet Dawson / TRANS. / (916) 319-2093 

                                                                   FN: 0004070