BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    






               SENATE COMMITTEE ON ELECTIONS, REAPPORTIONMENT AND  
                           CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS
                          Senator Loni Hancock, Chair


          BILL NO:   AB 2154                            HEARING DATE:  
          6/15/10
          AUTHOR:    SOLORIO                            ANALYSIS BY:   
             Darren Chesin 
          AMENDED:   3/24/10
          FISCAL:    NO
          
                                     SUBJECT

           Vote by mail ballots: telephone applications.
           
                                  DESCRIPTION  
          
           Existing law  provides that an application for a vote by  
          mail (VBM) ballot must be made in writing to the elections  
          official having jurisdiction over the election between the  
          29th and the 7th day prior to the election. The application  
          must be signed by the applicant and show his or her place  
          of residence.

           Existing law  also permits local elections officials to  
          offer voters the ability to electronically apply for a VBM  
          ballot using a the uniform electronic
          application provided by the Secretary of State (SOS).

           This bill  permits a local elections official to allow  
          voters to apply for VBM ballots by telephone. Specifically,  
          this bill allows local elections officials to offer voters  
          the ability to apply for a VBM ballot by telephone subject  
          to the following conditions:

           The applicant must provide to the elections official  
            personal identifying information that matches the  
            information contained on the applicant's affidavit of  
            registration, including first and last name, home  
            address, and date of birth. The applicant's signature is  
            not required for applications received by telephone.

           Except as otherwise provided, all provisions governing  
            written applications for VBM ballots apply to  
            applications for VBM ballots made by telephone.










                                    BACKGROUND  
          
           VBM Popularity  .  The number of voters choosing to vote  
          using a VBM ballot has increased significantly,  
          particularly since the enactment of AB 1520 (Shelley),  
          Chapter 922, Statutes of 2001, which allowed any voter to  
          become a permanent VBM voter.  Whereas just over 25% of  
          voters who participated in the 1998 statewide primary  
          election voted by VBM ballot, more than 41% of voters who  
          participated in the last five statewide elections voted by  
          mail.  These trends suggest that the number of voters  
          opting to vote by VBM ballot will continue to increase.
                                         
                                    COMMENTS  
          
           1.According to the author  , existing California law requires  
            that an application to request a VBM ballot must be made  
            in writing to the elections official having jurisdiction  
            over the election.  The applicant must sign the  
            application and show his or her place of residence, or  
            apply online.  Every election, large numbers of voters  
            call county elections departments to request a VBM ballot  
            over the telephone only to be told they must fill out an  
            application online or pick up a form from the election  
            official's office and then return it to the elections  
            department.

           2.Previous Legislation  .  AB 84 (Hill) of 2009 would have  
            required elections officials to establish procedures to  
            allow a VBM voter to find out whether his or her VBM  
            ballot was counted, and if not the reason why it was not  
            counted.  AB 84 was vetoed by the Governor who expressed  
            concern that it could result in additional costs to local  
            governments.  AB 2964 (Levine) of 2008, which was  
            substantially similar to AB 84 was also vetoed by the  
            Governor, though the Governor did not express any policy  
            objections to the bill.  SB 1725 (Bowen), Chapter 687,  
            Statutes of 2006, required elections officials to  
            establish procedures by March 1, 2008, to track and  
            confirm the receipt of voted VBM ballots and to make this  
            information available by online access using the county's  
            elections division website, or if none is available, by  
            means of a toll-free telephone number.
          AB 2154 (SOLORIO)                                      Page  
          2  
           









                                   PRIOR ACTION
           
          Assembly Elections and Redistricting Committee:  5-2
          Assembly Floor:                         49-19
           
                                   POSITIONS  

          Sponsor:  Orange County Board of Supervisors

          Support:  California Association of Clerks and Election  
          Officials
                    City of West Hollywood

           Oppose:     None received



























          AB 2154 (SOLORIO)                                      Page  
          3