BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 2165
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:  April 19, 2010

                       ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES
                                Wesley Chesbro, Chair
                    AB 2165 (Knight) - As Amended:  April 12, 2010
           
          SUBJECT  :  California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA):  
          exemption: High Desert Health System Multi-Service Ambulatory  
          Care Center

           SUMMARY  :  Establishes a new CEQA exemption for construction of a  
          proposed health care facility in Lancaster, California.  

          EXISTING LAW,  CEQA, requires lead agencies with the principal  
          responsibility for carrying out or approving a proposed project  
          to prepare a negative declaration, mitigated negative  
          declaration, or environmental impact report for this action,  
          unless the project is exempt from CEQA.  

           THIS BILL  :

          1)Exempts from review under CEQA construction of the "High  
            Desert Health System Multi-Service Ambulatory Care Center" (a  
            proposed health care facility in Lancaster, California). 

          2)Sunsets January 1, 2015.

          3)Contains an urgency clause.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  Unknown

           COMMENTS  :   

           Background.   CEQA provides a process for evaluating the  
          environmental effects of applicable projects undertaken or  
          approved by public agencies.  If a project is not exempt from  
          CEQA, an initial study is prepared to determine whether the  
          project may have a significant effect on the environment.  If  
          the initial study shows that there would not be a significant  
          effect on the environment, the lead agency must prepare a  
          negative declaration.  If the initial study shows that the  
          project may have a significant effect on the environment, the  
          lead agency must prepare an EIR.

          Generally, an EIR must accurately describe the proposed project,  








                                                                  AB 2165
                                                                  Page  2

          identify and analyze each significant environmental impact  
          expected to result from the proposed project, identify  
          mitigation measures to reduce those impacts to the extent  
          feasible, and evaluate a range of reasonable alternatives to the  
          proposed project.  Prior to approving any project that has  
          received environmental review, an agency must make certain  
          findings.  If mitigation measures are required or incorporated  
          into a project, the agency must adopt a reporting or monitoring  
          program to ensure compliance with those measures.

          If a mitigation measure would cause one or more significant  
          effects in addition to those that would be caused by the  
          proposed project, the effects of the mitigation measure must be  
          discussed but in less detail than the significant effects of the  
          proposed project.

           What is the exemption for?   This bill provides that CEQA does  
          not apply to activities or approvals related to construction of  
          the "High Desert Health System Multi-Service Ambulatory Care  
          Center" (MACC) project.  According to the author, the proposed  
          MACC will be located in the City of Lancaster and will entail  
          the construction of a new 124,000 square foot facility complex  
          comprised of several buildings.  The county (Los Angeles) is  
          planning to construct the MACC through a design-build process,  
          with completion anticipated in late 2010.  The complex is  
          estimated to cost $98.8 million.  Without detailed information  
          about the nature of the project, the site, and the surrounding  
          environment, it is impossible to assess its environmental  
          effects, but the project may produce significant environmental  
          effects, such as traffic impacts and issues regarding safe  
          handling of hazardous materials, that are worthy of review by  
          the affected community prior to the project's approval.

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :   

           Support 
           
          Associated Builders and Contractors of California
          Los Angeles County Supervisor Michael D. Antonovich

           Opposition 
           
          California Coastal Protection Network
          California League of Conservation Voters
          California Native Plant Society








                                                                  AB 2165
                                                                  Page  3

          Center for Biological Diversity
          Defenders of Wildlife
          Friends of the Earth
          Forest Forever
          Pacific Forest Trust 
          Planning and Conservation League
          Sierra Club California
          Sacramento Audubon Society

           
          Analysis Prepared by  :  Lawrence Lingbloom / NAT. RES. / (916)  
          319-2092