BILL ANALYSIS
AB 2207
Page 1
Date of Hearing: May 5, 2010
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Felipe Fuentes, Chair
AB 2207 (Fong) - As Amended: April 8, 2010
Policy Committee:
UtilitiesVote:10-4
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
Yes Reimbursable: No
SUMMARY
This bill:
1)Requires gas and electrical corporations (utilities) to allow
a customer who is subject to termination of service for
nonpayment of a delinquent bill to enter into a bill payment
plan of three months, or more than 12 months depending on the
customer's situation and ability to pay.
2)Permits a utility to file with the Public Utilities Commission
(PUC) an advice letter to open a memorandum account to track
any significant additional costs associated with complying
with the above requirement, and requires the PUC to consider
the process "reasonable" for the utility to recover the costs.
FISCAL EFFECT
Negligible fiscal impact to the PUC.
COMMENTS
Purpose . According to the author, this bill is intended to
ensure that utilities use uniform standards that provide
residential ratepayers an opportunity to finance their
delinquent bill charges. Some utilities are more lenient than
others and the author would like to provide a stronger level of
guidance than what is currently allowed in statute.
In February, the PUC issued a Rulemaking to establish ways to
improve customer notification and education to decrease the
AB 2207
Page 2
number of gas and electric utility service disconnections due to
nonpayment by improving customer notification and education. The
PUC noted that the current economic crisis in California and a
recent increase in utility service disconnections have led it to
reexamine utility disconnection rules and practices. Under this
order, the PUC required Pacific Gas and Electric Company,
Southern California Edison, San Diego Gas and Electric Company,
and Southern California Gas Company to implement interim
practices that are virtually identical to the requirements
included in this bill. The utilities and parties will have an
opportunity to comment on these interim practices and their
efficacies, as well as sunset provisions if appropriate, while
the parties continue to explore other solutions. The PUC is
expected to issue a decision this June.
Analysis Prepared by : Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916) 319-2081