BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 2207
                                                                  Page  1


          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
          AB 2207 (Fong)
          As Amended  April 8, 2010
          Majority vote 

           UTILITIES & COMMERCE            10-4                 
          APPROPRIATIONS      12-5                            
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Buchanan, Carter, Fong,   |Ayes:|Fuentes, Ammiano,         |
          |     |Fuentes, Furutani,        |     |Bradford,                 |
          |     |Huffman, Ma, Skinner,     |     |Charles Calderon, Coto,   |
          |     |Swanson, Bradford         |     |Davis,                    |
          |     |                          |     |De Leon, Hall, Skinner,   |
          |     |                          |     |Solorio, Torlakson,       |
          |     |                          |     |Torrico                   |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |Nays:|Knight, Fletcher, Fuller, |Nays:|Conway, Harkey, Miller,   |
          |     |Villines                  |     |Nielsen, Norby            |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 

           SUMMARY  :   Requires gas and electrical corporations (utilities)  
          to allow a customer who is subject to termination of service for  
          nonpayment of a delinquent bill to enter into a bill payment  
          plan of three months, or more than twelve months depending on  
          the customer's situation and ability to pay.  

           EXISTING LAW  :

          1)Requires utilities to first provide notice of delinquency and  
            impending termination prior to terminating residential service  
            for nonpayment.

          2)Precludes a utility from terminating service for nonpayment if  
            there is a pending investigation resulting from a complaint,  
            when a customer has been granted an extension, or on the  
            certification of a licensed physician or surgeon that  
            termination of service would be life-threatening to the  
            customer and the customer is financially unable to pay and is  
            willing to enter into an amortization agreement with the  
            utility.









                                                                  AB 2207
                                                                  Page  2


          3)When granted an extension due to a life-threatening situation,  
            requires the utility to allow the customer to amortize, over a  
            period not to exceed twelve months, the unpaid balance of any  
            bill asserted to be beyond the means of the customer to pay.

          4)Requires utilities to provide a residential customer an  
            opportunity for review of the complaint by a review manager,  
            where the customer has initiated a complaint or requested an  
            investigation within five days of receiving the disputed bill,  
            or who has before termination of service made a request for  
            extension of the payment period of a bill that's beyond their  
            ability to pay in full within the normal period for payment.  

          5)Permits any customer whose complaint or request for an  
            investigation has resulted in an adverse determination by the  
            utility to appeal the determination to California Public  
            Utilities Commission (PUC).

          6)Requires every electrical, gas, heat, or water corporation to  
            first give notice of an impending termination at least 10 days  
            prior to the proposed termination, and not earlier than 19  
            days from the date of mailing the utility's bill for services.

          7)Requires every utility to make a reasonable attempt to contact  
            an adult person residing at the premises of the customer by  
            telephone or personal contact at least 24 hours prior to any  
            termination of service, with an exception.

          8)Requires every utility to make available to residential  
            customer who are 65 years or age or older, a third-party  
            notification service and requires the utility to attempt to  
            notify the designated person.

          9)Precludes a utility from terminating service of a customer who  
            fails to comply with an amortization agreement without giving  
            notice to the customer at least 48 hours prior to termination  
            of the conditions the customer is required to meet to avoid  
            termination.  

           FISCAL EFFECT  :   Negligible fiscal impact to PUC.

           COMMENTS  :   According to the author, the purpose of this bill is  
          to ensure the utilities use uniform standards that provide  
          residential ratepayers an opportunity to finance their  








                                                                  AB 2207
                                                                  Page  3


          delinquent bill charges.  Some utilities are more lenient than  
          others and the author would like to provide a stronger level of  
          guidance than what is currently allowed in statute.

          On February 4, 2010, PUC issued a Rulemaking (10-02-005) to  
          establish ways to improve customer notification and education to  
          decrease the number of gas and electric utility service  
          disconnections due to nonpayment by improving customer  
          notification and education.  PUC noted that the economic crisis  
          currently existing in California and a recent increase in  
          utility service disconnections has led it to reexamine utility  
          disconnection rules and practices. 

          PUC's goal was to identify more effective ways for the utilities  
          to work with their customers and develop solutions that avoid  
          unnecessary disconnections without placing an undue cost burden  
          on other customers.  PUC focused on incorporating the productive  
          and effective practices that each utility can share so that all  
          gas and electric utilities have the benefit of implementing best  
          practices in its service territory.

          Under that order, PUC requires PG&E, SCE, SDG&E, and SoCalGas to  
          implement interim practices by February 11, 2010, or no later  
          than five business days from the mailing of the order.  Those  
          interim practices are virtually identical to the requirements  
          included in this bill.

          The utilities and parties will have an opportunity to comment on  
          these interim practices and their efficacies, as well as sunset  
          provisions if appropriate, while the parties continue to explore  
          and dialogue about other solutions to assist customers to pay  
          their utility bills and avoid disconnection of service.  PUC is  
          expected to issue a decision in June of this year.


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Gina Adams / U. & C. / (916) 319-2083 



                                                                FN: 0004250