BILL ANALYSIS
AB 2210
Page 1
CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS
AB 2210 (Fuentes)
As Amended July 15, 2010
Majority vote
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|ASSEMBLY: |74-0 |(May 6, 2010) |SENATE: |34-0 |(August 18, |
| | | | | |2010) |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Original Committee Reference: PUB. S.
SUMMARY : Authorizes a designated peace officer to use, or
authorize the warrantless use of, an electronic amplifying or
recording device to eavesdrop on or record, or both, any oral
communication within a particular location in response to an
emergency situation involving the taking of a hostage or
hostages or the barricading of a location.
The Senate amendments :
1)Provide a "barricading" occurs when a person refuses to come
out from a covered or enclosed position. Barricading also
occurs when a person is held against his or will and the
captor has not made a demand.
2)Define a "hostage situation" when a person is held against his
or her will and the captor has made a demand.
3)Require a peace officer who has been designated pursuant to
this section to use an eavesdropping device shall cease use of
the device upon the termination of the barricade or hostage
situation, or upon the denial by a judge of an application for
an order to approve the eavesdropping, whichever is earlier.
4)Make other technical, nonsubstantive amendments.
AS PASSED BY THE ASSEMBLY , this bill authorized a designated
peace officer to use, or authorize the warrantless use of, an
electronic amplifying or recording device to eavesdrop on or
record, or both, any oral communication within a particular
location in response to an emergency situation involving the
taking of a hostage or hostages or the barricading of a
location.
AB 2210
Page 2
FISCAL EFFECT : According to the Senate Appropriations
Committee analysis, minor absorbable court costs. Additional
costs unlikely to result from this bill.
COMMENTS : According to the author, "AB 2210 closes a loophole
in existing law relative to law enforcement conduct in barricade
and hostage situations to clarify that law enforcement who
deploy eavesdropping techniques in limited circumstances are not
subject to civil or criminal liability."
Please see the policy committee for a full discussion of this
bill.
Analysis Prepared by : Nicole J. Hanson / PUB. S. / (916)
319-3744
FN: 0005551