BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    






           SENATE TRANSPORTATION & HOUSING COMMITTEE       BILL NO: ab 2245
          SENATOR ALAN LOWENTHAL, CHAIRMAN               AUTHOR:  hill
                                                         VERSION: 4/21/10
          Analysis by: Carrie Cornwell                   FISCAL:  yes
          Hearing date: June 15, 2010








          SUBJECT:

          Vehicles: aftermarket horns

          DESCRIPTION:

          This bill prohibits a vehicle from being equipped with an  
          aftermarket horn that emits a sound greater than 110 decibels. 

          ANALYSIS:

          Existing law requires that a motor vehicle must have a horn in  
          good working order and capable of emitting sound audible at 200  
          feet in order to operate legally on the streets and highways in  
          this state. A vehicle horn may not, however, emit an  
          unreasonably loud or harsh sound. 

           This bill  prohibits a vehicle from being equipped with an  
          aftermarket horn that emits a sound greater than 110 decibels  
          [dB(A)].
          
          COMMENTS:

           1.Purpose  . The author notes that aftermarket car horns can emit  
            decibel levels of over 170 and are marketed in a way that is  
            clearly not for the benefit of public health or safety. He  
            notes that one of the producers of these products even has a  
            YouTube video on their website titled, "Scaring People with A  
            Train Horn" that shows a car equipped with one of these  
            devices driving around scaring pedestrians and drivers.  
            Because existing law limits train horns to 110 decibels and  
            because the average vehicle horn is about 110 decibels, that  
            author asserts that it is appropriate to set a limit for car  




          AB 2245 (HILL)                                           Page 2

                                                                       


            horns at that level. He further notes that these products  
            could still be sold as this bill simply prohibits a vehicle  
            from being equipped with a horn that emits a sound in excess  
            of 110 decibels.  

           2.Enforcement issue  . Existing law prohibits a vehicle horn from  
            being "unreasonably loud." This bill defines "unreasonably  
            loud" as 110 decibels. The California Highway Patrol (CHP)  
            reports that it issues no tickets under the existing law, but  
            if its officers did, these would most likely be "fix-it"  
            tickets. It is unclear therefore that this bill would lead to  
            more vehicle owners being cited for unreasonably loud horns,  
            especially in light of the fact that CHP and other traffic  
            enforcement officers do not typically carry sound measurement  
            equipment.

            A more enforceable option would be to make it illegal to sell  
            an aftermarket horn that can exceed 110 decibels, as this  
            committee and the Legislature have done with other harmful  
            aftermarket vehicle products. For example, in 2007, the  
            Legislature passed AB 801 (Walters), Chapter 273, which  
            imposed a $250 base fine for selling a material or device that  
            obstructs or impairs the reading or recognition of a vehicle's  
            license plates. The author or the committee may, therefore,  
            wish to amend this bill to make it an infraction punishable by  
            a fine of up $250 to sell an aftermarket car horn that can  
            exceed 110 decibels.

          Assembly Votes:
               Floor:    48 - 26
               Appr: 12 - 5
               Trans:      8 - 4

          POSITIONS:  (Communicated to the Committee before noon on  
          Wednesday,
                     June 9, 2010)

               SUPPORT:  None received.
          
               OPPOSED:  None received.